Advertisement

The Role of Party Members in the Slovak Republic

Chapter
  • 41 Downloads
Part of the St Antony's Series book series (STANTS)

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of party members in the Slovak Republic. Surveys and interviews were used to gather information about the roles of party members in SMER—Social Democracy and the (now defunct) Social and Democratic Christian Union—Democratic Party. Using this data, the sub-hypotheses developed in Chap.  2 are tested. It is found that Slovakia’s high magnitude proportional electoral system encourages parties to communicate with voters primarily through mass, social and digital media. Grassroots campaigning is more likely to occur in advance of municipal elections; however, parties from the fragmented centre-right struggled to establish a significant presence outside the major cities. The success of ‘micro-parties’ prompted elites from existing parties to consider whether members were necessary for modern campaigning.

References

  1. Bawn, K., & Thies, M. F. (2003). A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganised Under PR, Plurality and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowler, S., & Farrell, D. M. (Eds.). (1992). Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Basingstoke: Houndmills.Google Scholar
  3. Deegan-Krause, K. (2003). Slovakia’s Second Transition. Journal of Democracy, 14(2), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deegan-Krause, K., & Haughton, T. (2012). The 2010 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gherghina, S. (2015). Party Organisation and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Haughton, T. (2001). HZDS: The Ideology, Organisation and Support Base of Slovakia’s Most Successful Party. Europe-Asia Studies, 53(3), 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kopecký, P. (2007). Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. May, J. (1973). Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity. Political Studies, 21(2), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rybář, M. (2006). Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3), 320–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scarrow, S. E. (1995). Political Parties and Their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Scarrow, S. E. (2014). Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tavits, M. (2013). Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Učeň, P., Deegan-Krause, K., & Bértoa, F. C. (2017). Limits of Regulation: Party Law and Finance in Slovakia. In F. C. Bértoa & I. van Biezen (Eds.), The Regulation of Post-Communist Party Politics. Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. van Biezen, I. (2003). Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wolinetz, S. B. (2002). Beyond the Catch-All Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies. In R. Gunther et al. (Eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political DevelopmentsLandsmeerThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations