Abstract
It is challenging to educate medical students. In medical school, a student undergoes a transformation to physician, the profession responsible for integrating the evolving and expanding scientific basis of disease with a patient’s need for relief of pain and suffering. Society expects the future physician to be a keen problem solver, a self-directed learner, and an integrative thinker. Optimizing active learning modalities facilitates the development of these competencies.
“Flipping the classroom” by reversing the curricular positions of passive and active learning activities heralds the twenty-first century vision for the education of future healthcare professionals. In the “flipped classroom” approach, the students are expected to self-learn foundational information before attending a formal class. This teaching method facilitates the implementation of the principles of constructivist learning theory. The constructivist theory maintains that the learner is active in the construction of new knowledge based on his or her existing knowledge. The in-class time is dedicated to consolidating and integrating knowledge through active student involvement.
Case-based learning (CBL) and team-based learning (TBL) are two pedagogical methods which often use the flipped classroom concept to provide active learning activities. Practical examples of several pedagogical techniques are presented in their original formats in addition to examples of how these formats can be flexed to facilitate active learning across a spectrum of curricula.
The problems, challenges, and opportunities of the flipped classroom and active learning methods are discussed, and recommendations for success are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive domains. New York: White Plains.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspective and practice (pp. 8–33). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching., 42(5), 62–66.
Harden, R., & Lilley, P. (2018). The teacher as information provider and coach. In The eight roles of the medical teacher (1st ed.). Edinburgh: Elsevier.
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.
Morton, D. A., & Colbert-Getz, J. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(2), 170–175.
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15–21.
Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/.
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864.
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38.
Thistlethwaite, J. E., Davies, D., Ekeocha, S., et al. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Medical Teacher, 34(6), e421–e444.
Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine, 82(1), 74–82.
Michaelson, L., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. In L. Michaelson, M. Sweet, & D. Parmelee (Eds.), Team-based learning: Small group learning's next big step (Vol. 116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Koehncke, N. (2012). Flipped teaching approach to cased based learning. Canada: The Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Saskatchewan.
Patry, JL. (2007). VaKE-introduction and theoretical background. In: Values and Foundations in Gifted Education. p. 157–169.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dickman, N., Cohn-Schwartz, D. (2020). Active Teaching–Active Learning: Methods and Variations. In: Dickman, N., Schuster, B. (eds) Active Education for Future Doctors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41780-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41780-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41779-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41780-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)