Skip to main content

Students as Near-Peer and Peer-Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Peer teaching helps prepare medical students and house officers for their future roles as health-care professionals. Two collaborative approaches are notable, reciprocal peer eaching (RPT) and near-peer teaching (NPT), wherein students alternate roles as teacher and learner or where students or house staff learn to facilitate training of younger colleagues. Both educational platforms draw on a similar knowledge base and shared generational experiences between students. Both teaching protocols include promotion of another student’s active learning through direct interactions and reinforcement of one’s own learning through instructing others. Examples of the use of these techniques in both preclinical and clinical medical education are presented as well as a near-peer teaching program in the framework of preclinical medical education course in human anatomy. Since teaching is an important skill for future postgraduate education, clinical practice, and academic engagement, education for this role should be introduced early and practiced throughout medical training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hall, S., et al. (2013). Near-peer teaching in clinical neuroanatomy. The Clinical Teacher, 10(4), 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulte, C., et al. (2007). Student teaching: Views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duran, C. E., et al. (2012). Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(3), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ten Cate, O., & Durning, S. (2007). Peer teaching in medical education: Twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Field, M., et al. (2007). Peer-assisted learning: A novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Medical Education, 41(4), 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aba Alkhail, B. (2015). Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical students and their perception of having medical interns as their near peer teacher. Medical Teacher, 37(sup 1), S33–S39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Olaussen, A., et al. (2016). Peer-assisted learning: Time for nomenclature clarification. Medical Education Online, 21(1), 30974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rees, E. L., et al. (2016). How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 829–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickman, N. (2005). Journal writing as a vehicle for reflecting and enhancing learning processes of mathematics teachers in the course of becoming mathematics teacher educators, in (in Hebrew). Haifa: Technion- Israel Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marton, G. E., McCullough, B., & Ramnanan, C. J. (2015). A review of teaching skills development programmes for medical students. Medical Education, 49(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soriano, R. P., et al. (2010). Teaching medical students how to teach: A national survey of students-as-teachers programs in U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine, 85(11), 1725–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shariq, O., et al. (2013). Teaching skills training for medical students. The Clinical Teacher, 10(3), 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blanco, M. A., et al. (2014). How we launched a developmental student-as-teacher (SAT) program for all medical students. Medical Teacher, 36(5), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burgess, A., & McGregor, D. (2018). Peer teacher training for health professional students: A systematic review of formal programs. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song, C., Davis, B. J., & Lambert, D. R. (2015). The medical education pathway: Description and early outcomes of a student-as-teacher program. Academic Medicine, 90(4), 458–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Erlich, D. R., & Shaughnessy, A. F. (2014). Student–teacher education programme (STEP) by step: Transforming medical students into competent, confident teachers. Medical Teacher, 36(4), 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liew, S.-C., et al. (2015). The near-peer tutoring programme: Embracing the ‘doctors-to-teach’ philosophy – A comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors. Medical Education Online, 20(1), 27959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Horneffer, A., et al. (2016). Effect of didactically qualified student tutors on their tutees’ academic performance and tutor evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger, 208, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Batchelder, A. J., et al. (2010). The role of students as teachers: Four years’ experience of a large-scale, peer-led programme. Medical Teacher, 32(7), 547–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manyama, M., et al. (2016). Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Medical Education, 16, 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laufer, M., et al. (2014). Pediatrician workforce planning: The Israeli experience and projections of pediatric manpower 1995–2025. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(4).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reis, S., et al. (2016). Medical education in Israel 2016: Five medical schools in in a period of transition. Israel Journal Health Policy Research, 5, 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspective and practice (pp. 8–33). NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harden, R., & Laidlaw, J. (2012). Essential skills for a medical teacher: An introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Erlich, D. R., & Shaughnessy, A. F. (2014). Student–teacher education programme (STEP) by step: Transforming medical students into competent, confident teachers. Medical Teacher, 36, 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Karasik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karasik, D., Dickman, N. (2020). Students as Near-Peer and Peer-Teachers. In: Dickman, N., Schuster, B. (eds) Active Education for Future Doctors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41780-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41780-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41780-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics