Advertisement

Vineyard as an Organizational Metaphor

  • Deloris S. ThomasEmail author
Chapter
  • 37 Downloads
Part of the Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business book series (CFPLB)

Abstract

The vineyard as a metaphor examines factors of organizational adaptation and linkages between strategic choice and environmental determinism. Vineyard management incorporates important concepts such as terroir that ranks and defines high quality wines based on soil, climate, and canopy management. The examination of three companies from different industries—IKEA, Intel, and Barnes and Noble—serve as examples of how to adapt to a rapidly changing environment. One of the key takeaways from applying the vineyard metaphor to organization adaptation relates to the ability to produce high quality performance in poor environments. The pruning and vine training demonstrates the importance of divesting healthy vines to allow maximum adequate nutrients to flow to selected vines to yield a higher performance. The rich metaphor of the vineyard provides an opportunity for organizations to explore innovative strategies to adapt to changing and complex environments.

References

  1. Abatecola, G. (2012). Organizational adaptation: An update. International Journal of Organizational Analysis (Emerald), 20(3), 274.  https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831211243802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomberg, C. (1992). Matthew (The new American commentary) (Vol. 22, p. 214). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Bramley, R. G. V., Trought, M. C., & Praat, J. P. (2011). Vineyard variability in Marlborough, New Zealand: Characterising variation in vineyard performance and options for the implementation of precision viticulture. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 17(1), 72–78.Google Scholar
  4. Burgelman, R. A. (1994). Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson, D. A. (1991). The Gospel according to John (The pillar new testament commentary) (p. 514). Leicester, UK/Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press/W.B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  6. Chevet, J., Lecocq, S., & Visser, M. (2011). Climate, grapevine phenology, wine production, and prices: Pauillac (1800–2009). American Economic Review, 101(3), 142–146.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross, R., Plantinga, A. J., & Stavins, R. N. (2011). What is the value of terroir? American Economic Review, 101(3), 152–156.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deligonul, S., Elg, U., Cavusgil, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2013). Developing strategic supplier networks: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 66, 506–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dry, P. R. (2000). Canopy management for fruitfulness. Australian Journal of Grape & Wine Research, 6(2), 109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00168.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hannah, L., Roehrdanz, P. R., Ikegami, M., Shepard, A. V., Shaw, M. R., Tabor, G., et al. (2013). Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(17), 6907.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210127110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1985). Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Issitt, M. B.(2015). Viticulture and enology. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Science.Google Scholar
  14. Köstenberger, A. J. (2004). John (Baker exegetical commentary on the New Testament) (p. 451). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Lawless, M. W., & Finch, L. K. (1989). Choice and determinism: A test of Hrebiniak and Joyce’s framework on strategy-environment fit. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, M. Y., Chi, M., Tang, Y. H., Song, C. Z., Xi, Z. M., & Zhang, Z. W. (2015). Effect of three training systems on grapes in a wet region of China: Yield, incidence of disease and anthocyanin compositions of Vitisvinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Molecules, 20(10), 18967–18987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, S. R., & Dunn, G. M. (2000). Effect of pruning time and hydrogen cyanamide on budburst and subsequent phenology of Vitisvinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon in central Victoria. Australian Journal of Grape & Wine Research, 6(1), 31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00159.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCray, J. P., Gonzalez, J. J., & Darling, J. R. (2012). Transformational crisis management in organizational development: A focus on the case of Barnes & Noble vs. Amazon. Organization Development Journal, 30(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  19. Oberlechner, T., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2002). Through their own words: Towards a new understanding of leadership through metaphors. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  20. Pellegrino, A., Lebon, E., Simonneau, T., & Wery, J. (2005). Towards a simple indicator of water stress in grapevine (Vitisvinifera L.) based on the differential sensitivities of vegetative growth components. Australian Journal of Grape & Wine Research, 11(3), 306.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00030.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robbins, V. (1996). Social and culture texture: Every meaning has a context. In The tapestry of early Christian discourse rhetoric, society, and ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, G., Arora, N. K., & Gill, M. S. (2014). Effect of pruning intensity on bud fruitfulness, yield and anthocyanin content of grape (Vitisvinifera) hybrid H-516 trained on bower system. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 16(2), 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smart, R. E. (1992). Canopy management. In B. G. Coombe & P. R. Dry (Eds.), Viticulture Volume 2, Practices (pp. 85–103). Winetitles: Adelaide.Google Scholar
  24. Van Leeuwen, C., & Seguin, G. (2006). The concept of terroir in viticulture. Journal of Wine Research, 17(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260600633135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Leeuwen, C., Friant, Ph., Soyer, J.-P., Molot, C., Choné, X., & Dubourdieu, D. (2000). L’intérêt du dosage de l’azote total et l’azote assimilable dans le moût comme indicateur de la nutrition azotée de la vigne. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 34, 75–82.Google Scholar
  26. Wilkins, M. (2004). Matthew: From biblical text – To contemporary life. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regent UniversityVirginia BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations