Skip to main content

A Brief Look into the Origins of Fish Welfare Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Welfare of Fish

Part of the book series: Animal Welfare ((AWNS,volume 20))

Abstract

Every year, humans kill or injure trillions of fishes in fisheries, recreational fishing, aquaculture, and through the destruction or contamination of their habitats. However, until recently fish welfare has been paid little attention. The recent, at least partial, inclusion of fish within the moral circle can be seen as a natural/logical consequence of the increased attention paid to animal welfare in general, and in particular to the welfare of farmed fish in the rapidly growing intensive fish farming industry. The concern for fish welfare was first raised by animal protection groups in the early 1990s, and by the end of that decade, fish welfare had started to receive attention from scientists, food authorities, politicians, and the aquaculture industry. After the turn of the millennium, fish welfare blossomed into a research topic and became a prioritized and integrated part of animal welfare legislation in Europe. This chapter tells the story about the rise of animal welfare as a topic of concern, and especially fish welfare science, including the controversy concerning pain and consciousness in fish.

Very little of the great cruelty shown by men can really be attributed to cruel instinct. Most of it comes from thoughtlessness or inherited habit. The roots of cruelty, therefore, are not so much strong as widespread. But the time must come when inhumanity protected by custom and thoughtlessness will succumb before humanity championed by thought. Let us work that this time may come.

Albert Schweitzer, Reverence for Life

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References 

  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Schwab A, Cowx IG (2007a) Fish welfare: a challenge to the feelings-based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish Fish 8:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00233.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Lyman J, Policansky D, Schwab A, Suski C, Sutton SG, Thorstad EB (2007b) Understanding the complexity of catch-and-release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev Fish Sci 15:75–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260601149432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley PJ (2007) Fish welfare: current issues in aquaculture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 104(3–4):199–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley PJ, Sneddon LU, McCrohan CR (2007) Nociception in fish: stimulus-response properties of receptors on the head of trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Brain Res 1166:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton BA, Iwama GK (1991) Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Annu Rev Fish Dis 1:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge MCM, Little DC (2002) History of aquaculture in traditional societies. In: Costa-Pierce BA (ed) Ecological aquaculture. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracke MBM, Spruijt BM, Metz JHM (1999) Overall welfare reviewed. Part 3: welfare assessment based on needs and supported by expert opinion. Neth JAgric Sci 47:307–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambell FWR (1965) Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson EJ (ed) (2008) Fish welfare. Blackwell Publishing, 300 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1991) Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 69:4167–4175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2007) Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected? Dis Aquat Org 75:99–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2011) A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheor 59:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C (2015) Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Anim Cogn 18(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Carere M, Mather J (2019) The welfare of invertebrate animals. Animal welfare book series, vol 18. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandroo K (2004) Can fish suffer?: perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86:225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandroo KP, Yue S, Moccia RD (2004) An evaluation of current perspectives on consciousness and pain in fishes. Fish Fish 5:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2679.2004.00163.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte F (2004) Stress and the welfare of cultured fish. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86:205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Sneddon LU (2007) Animal welfare perspectives on recreational angling. Appl Anim Behav Sci 104:176–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordis (2019). https://cordis.europa.eu/search/result_en?q=fish+welfare

  • Damsgård B, Juell J, Braastad, BO (2006) Welfare in farmed fish Fiskeriforskning Report 5/2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1980) Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1990) From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behav Brain Sci 13:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21:77–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diggles BK, Cooke SJ, Rose JD, Sawynok W (2011) Ecology and welfare of aquatic animals in wild capture fisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fish 21:739–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9206-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH (1996) Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agric Scand Suppl 27:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan I (2006) The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop R, Laming P (2005) Mechanoreceptive and nociceptive responses in the central nervous system of goldfish (Carassius auratus) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Pain 6:561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop R, Millsopp S, Laming P (2006) Avoidance learning in goldfish (Carassius auratus) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and implications for pain perception. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2004) Welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing the main commercial species of animals. EFSA J 45:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2008a) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed Atlantic salmon. EFSA J 736:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2008b) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed common carp. EFSA J 843:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2008c) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed European seabass and gilthead seabream. EFSA J 844:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2008d) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed trout. EFSA J 796:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2008e) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed European eel. EFSA J 809:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2009a) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare – Species-specific welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing of farmed tuna. EFSA J 1072:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2009b) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare – Species-specific welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing of farmed tuna. EFSA J 1073:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2009c) General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare. EFSA J 954:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1997) Treaty of Amsterdam. www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf

  • FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome, 200 p. http://www.fao.org/aquaculture/en/

  • FAWC (1979) Press statement. http://www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/fivefreedoms1979.pdf

  • FAWC (1996) Report on the welfare of farmed fish. The Farm Animal Welfare Council, Surbiton, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (2008) Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet Scand 50(Suppl 1):S1

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (2009) Assessing animal welfare: different philosophies, different scientific approaches. Zoo Biol 28:507–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FSBI (2002) Fish Welfare. Briefing Paper 2, Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Granta Information Systems, Sawston, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Galhardo L, Oliveira RF (2009) Psychological stress and welfare in fish. ARBS Annu Rev Biomed Sci 11:1–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godin J-GJ (1997) Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford University Press, 384 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R (1964) Animal machines – the new factory farming industry. Vincent Stuart, London, 186 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJB, Reynolds JD (2002) Handbook of fish biology and fisheries, vol 2. Wiley, 428 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Håstein T, Scarfe AD, Lund VL (2005) Science-based assessment of welfare: aquatic animals. Rev Sci Tech 24:529–547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA, Toricelli P (1993) Behavioural ecology of fishes. Ettore Majorama Life Sciences Series, vol 11. Harwood Academic, Chur, 326 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA, Adams C, Braithwaite VA, Kadri S, Pottinger TG, Sandøe P, Turnbull JF (2006) Current issues in fish welfare. J Fish Biol 68:332–372

    Google Scholar 

  • IASP (International Association for the Study of Pain) (1979) Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain 6:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwama GK, Pickering AD, Sumpter JP, Schreck CB (1997) Fish stress and health in aquaculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestin SC (1994) Pain and stress in fish. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Amended. RSPCA, Horsham, West Sussex, 36 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Key B (2015) Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness. Biol Philos 30:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Key B (2016) Why fish do not feel pain. Anim Sent 3(1). https://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/1/

  • Lerner H (2008) The concepts of health, well-being and welfare as applied to animals. A philosophical analysis of the concepts with regard to the differences between animals. Linköping studies in arts and science No. 438. Dissertations on Health and Society No. 13. Linköpings Universitet, Department of Medical and Health Sciences. Linköping 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund V, Mejdell CM, Röcklinsberg H, Anthony R, Håstein T (2007) Expanding the moral circle: farmed fish as objects of moral concern. Dis Aquat Org 75:109–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lymbery P (1992) The welfare of farmed fish. Compassion in World Farming. Petersfield, Hampshire, 23 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lymbery P (2002) In too deep—the welfare of intensively farmed fish. Compassion in World Farming, Petersfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway L (1980) Report of the panel of inquiry into shooting and angling (1976–1979). Panel of Enquiry into Shooting and Angling, Horsham, 58 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor DJ (2016) Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the “five freedoms” towards “A lifeworth living”. Animals 6:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor DJ (2019) Opinion: welfare-aligned sentience: enhanced capacities to experience, interact, anticipate, choose and survive. Animals 9(7):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merker B (2016) Drawing the line on pain. Anim Sent 30:23. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ef9d/a66d1fc0aae06ef22d43fc2784c28a3703f7.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg GP, Mench JA (eds) (2000) The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. CAB International, Wallingford. 384 p

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor S, Ono R, Clarkson C (2011) Pelagic fishing at 42,000 years before the present and the maritime skills of modern humans. Science 334(6059):1117–1121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen VV, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F Jr (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279(5352):860–863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pen O, Rose JD (2007) Anthropomorphism and “mental welfare” of fishes. Dis Aquat Org 75:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C (2009) The welfare of animals. The silent majority. Springer, 220 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering AD (ed) (1981) Stress and fish. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1992) Behaviour of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, 717 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottinger TG (1995) Fish welfare literature review. Institute of Fresh Water Ecology, IFE Report No. WI/T11063f7/1, 82 p. http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/7223/1/Fish_Welfare_Literature_Review_-_TG_Pottinger_-_1995.pdf

  • Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. 425 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin BE (1989) Studies in bioethics. The unheeded cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 330 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose JD (2002) The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Rev Fish Sci 10:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose JD (2007) Anthropomorphism and mental welfare of fishes. Dis Aquat Org 75:139–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose JD, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Diggles BK, Sawynok W, Stevens ED, Wynne CDL (2012) Can fish really feel pain? Fish Fish:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12010

  • Schreck CB (1981) Stress and compensation in teleostean fishes: response to social and physical factors. In: Pickering AD (ed) Stress and fish. Academic, London, pp 295–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck CB (1990) Physiological, behavioural, and performance indicators of stress. Am Fish Soc Symp 8:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1975) Animal liberation. A new ethics for our treatments of animals. Harper Collins, New York, NY, p 311

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1981) The expanding circle: ethics and sociobiology. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York, 208 p. http://www.stafforini.com/docs/Singer%20-%20The%20expanding%20circle.pdf

  • Sneddon LU (2002) Anatomical and electrophysiological analysis of the trigeminal nerve in a teleost fish, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Neurosci Lett 319:167–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU (2006) Ethics and welfare: pain perception in fish. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 26:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ (2003a) Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Biol Sci 270:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ (2003b) Novel object test: examining nociception and fear in the rainbow trout. J Pain 4(8):431–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU, Elwood RW, Adamoc SA, Leach MC (2014) Review: defining and assessing animal pain. Anim Behav 97:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU, Lopez-Luna K, Wolfenden DCC, Leach MC, Valentim AM, Steenbergen PJ, Bardine N, Currie AD, Broom D, Brown C (2018) Fish sentience denial: muddying the waters. Anim Sentience 3(21):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundli A (1999) Holmenkollen guidelines for sustainable aquaculture (adopted 1998). In: Svennevig N, Reinertsen H, New M (eds) Sustainable aquaculture: food for the future? A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 343–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe WH (1965) The assessment of pain and distress in animals. Appendix III in Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive husbandry conditions, F.W.R. Brambell (chairman). H.M.S.O., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen T, Bracke M, Kristiansen TS (2011) Reply to Diggles et al. (2011): Ecology and welfare of aquatic animals in wild capture fisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fish 21:767–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrissen O, Olsen RE, Toresen R, Hemre GI, Tacon AGJ, Asche F, Hardy RW, Lall S (2011) Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar): the “super-chicken” of the sea? Rev Fish Sci 19:257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull JF, Kadri S (2007) Safeguarding the many guises of farmed fish welfare. Dis Aquat Org 75:173–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vis H, Kiessling A, Flik G, Mackenzie S (eds) (2012) Welfare of farmed fish in present and future production systems. Springer, Dordrecht. 302 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpato GL (2009) Challenges in assessing fish welfare. ILAR J 50(4):329–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J (2005) Animal welfare limping towards eden. Blackwell Publishing, UFAW Animal Welfare Series. 283 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfare Quality (2009) Assessment protocols for cattle, pigs and poultry; Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendelaar Bonga SE (1997) The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 77:591–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff ML (2017) Consciousness in teleosts: there is something it feels like to be a fish. Anim Sentience 2(13):1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tore S. Kristiansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kristiansen, T.S., Bracke, M.B.M. (2020). A Brief Look into the Origins of Fish Welfare Science. In: Kristiansen, T., Fernö, A., Pavlidis, M., van de Vis, H. (eds) The Welfare of Fish. Animal Welfare, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41675-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics