Skip to main content

The Philosophy of Astronomy, Cosmology, and Astrobiology: A Preliminary Reconnaissance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Although the philosophy of science and of specific sciences such as physics, chemistry, and biology are well-developed fields with their own books and journals, the philosophy of astronomy and cosmology have received little systematic attention. It is time for coherent action in creating this new discipline. At least six categories of issues may be identified in the astronomical context: (1) the nature of reasoning, including the roles of observation, theory, simulation, and analogy, as well as the limits of reasoning, starkly evident in the anthropic principle, fine-tuning, and multiverse controversies; (2) the problematic nature of evidence and inference, especially since the objects of astronomical interest are for the most part beyond experiment and experience; (3) the influence of metaphysical preconceptions and non-scientific worldviews on astronomy, evidenced, for example in the work of Arthur S. Eddington and many other astronomers; (4) the epistemological status of astronomy and its central concepts, including the process of discovery, the problems of classification, and the pitfalls of definition (as in planets); (5) the role of technology in shaping the discipline of astronomy and our view of the universe; and (6) the mutual interactions of astronomy and cosmology with society over time. In addition to astronomy and cosmology in general, astrobiology is highlighted as a specific case study of the issues at hand.

Discussion of these issues should draw heavily on the history of astronomy as well as current scientific research, and may reveal an evolution in approaches, techniques, and goals, perhaps with policy relevance. This endeavor should also utilize and synergize approaches and results from philosophy of science and of related sciences such as physics, including discussions on the nature of space and time. A coherent discipline of philosophy of astronomy and cosmology is desirable for the same reason that the philosophy of the biological and other physical sciences not only exist but flourish: to better understand the foundations, assumptions, and goals of the science. This chapter is therefore a call for philosophers, historians, scientists, and science studies scholars to join in this new endeavor.

Published here for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://astrobiology.illinois.edu/ for the Institute for Universal Biology.

References

  • Aguirre, Anthony, Brendan Foster and Zeeya Merali, eds. 2016. Trick or Truth? The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics. Switzerland: Springer International.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aveni, Anthony. 1989. Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John D. and Frank J. Tipler. 1986. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, Edwin A. 1924. Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, Melvin. 1981. Interview with Calvin in David Swift, SETI Pioneers. Tucson, 1990, 120–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Bernard. 2007. Universe or Multiverse? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chamcham, Khalil, Joseph Silk, John D. Barrow, and Simon Saunders eds. 2017. The Philosophy of Cosmology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćirković, Milan. 2012. The Astrobiological Landscape: Philosophical Foundations of the Study of Cosmic Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, Carol E. and C. Chyba. 2007. “Does ‘Life’ Have a Definition? in Sullivan and Baross (2007) pp. 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. 1995. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search of the Soul, Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curd, Martin, J. A. Cover and Christopher Pincock. 2012. Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. W. W. Norton and Company: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 1991. “History of Science in an Elegiac Mode: E. A. Burtt's Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science Revisited,” Isis, 82, 522–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies P, About Time: Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995), pp. 272ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1st ed., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1996. Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Duve, Christian. 1995. Vital Dust: Life as a Cosmic Imperative. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deamer, David W. 2010. “Special Collection of Essays: What is Life?” Astrobiology, 10, 1001–1002 and following.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deamer, David W. and Fleischaker, G. 1994. Origins of Life: The Central Concepts. Jones and Bartlett, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVito, Carl, 2013. Science, SETI and Mathematics. Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 1996. The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 2003. Sky and Ocean Joined: The U. S. Naval Observatory, 1830-2000. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 2013. Discovery and Classification in Astronomy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 2015. The Impact of Discovering Life Beyond Earth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 2018. Astrobiology, Discovery, and Societal Impact: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. and Lupisella, M. L., editors. 2009. Cosmos & Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context. Washington, DC: NASA, online at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4802.pdf

  • Dick, Steven J. and Strick, J. E. 2004. The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology. New Brunswick: NJ Rutgers University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunér, David, J. Parthemore, E. Persson, and G. Holmberg, eds. 2013. The History and Philosophy of Astrobiology: Perspectives on Extraterrestrial Life and the Human Mind. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunér, David, E. Persson, and G. Holmberg, eds. 2012. The History and Philosophy of Astrobiology, special issue of Astrobiology, 12, pp. 901–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Freeman. 1988. Infinite in all Directions. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, David. 2009. “Brain Time,” at https://www.edge.org/conversation/brain-time

  • Ellis, G. F. R. 1998a. “Cosmology and Verifiability,” in Leslie (1998), 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. F. R. 1998b. “Emerging Questions and Uncertainties,” in Leslie (1998), 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. F. R. 2006. Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In Philosophy of Physics, edited by J. Butterfield and J. Earman, pp. 1183–1285. North Holland, online at http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0602280v2

  • Ellis, G. F. R. 2017. “The Domain of Cosmology and the Testing of Cosmological Theories,” in Chamcham et al., 2017, 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. F. R., U. Kirchner and W. R. Stoeger. 2004. “Multiverses and physical cosmology,” MNRAS, 346, 921–936.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillion, Nicolas. 2012. “The Reasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences,” University of Ontario PhD Thesis. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2265&context=etd

  • Fry, Iris. 2012. “Is Science Metaphysically Neutral?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 665–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, George. 1993. “Philosophical Aspects of the Origin of Modern Cosmology,” in Encyclopedia of Cosmology: Historical, Philosophical and Scientific Foundations of Modern Cosmology Garland: New York and London, pp. 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I. 2008. "Solving Wigner’s mystery: The reasonable (though perhaps limited) effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences". The Mathematical Intelligencer, 30: 7–17, online at http://www.sfu.ca/~rpyke/cafe/reasonable.pdf.

  • Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwit, Martin. 2013. In Search of the True Universe: The Tools, Shaping, and Cost of Cosmological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, John. 1841. Presidential Address on the occasion of awarding the Gold Medal of the Society to Bessel, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society of London, vol. 5 no. 12, February 12, 1841, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, Norriss. 1988. Science and Objectivity. Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, Norriss. 1993. Cosmology: Historical, Literary, Religious, and Scientific Perspectives. New York and London, Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, James. 2012. Why Does the World Exist? An Existential Detective Story. Liverright Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, G. G. 1994. Foreword to Deamer and Fleischaker (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 2003. “How to Live With an Embodied Mind: When Causation, Mathematics, Morality, the Soul, and God are Essentially Metaphorical Ideas,” in Anthony Sanford, ed., The Nature and Limits of Human Understanding. London and New York, pp. 75–108: 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Marc. 2012. Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics: Locality, Fields, Energy and Mass. Wiley-Blackwell: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J. ed. (1998. Modern Cosmology & Philosophy. Prometheus Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightman, Alan and Roberta Brawer. 1990. The Lives and Worlds of Modern Cosmologists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, Ernan. 1981. “Is Philosophy Relevant to Cosmology?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, no. 3, 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Stanley and Harold Urey. “Organic Compound Synthesis on the Primitive Earth,” Science, 130 (July 31, 1959, 245–251: 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, Jacques. 1970. Chance and Necessity. Knopf, New York, pp. 144–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, James R. 1989. History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays for John C. Greene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA. 2015. Astrobiology Strategy online at https://nai.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2016/04/NASA_Astrobiology_Strategy_2015_FINAL_041216.pdf

  • Nicholson, Jason Scott. 2012. “A Perspective on Wigner’s ‘Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics,” Notices of the AMS, 59, 1, 38–42. https://www.ams.org/notices/201201/rtx120100038p.pdf

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • North, John. 1965. The Measure of the Universe: A History of Modern Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Notre Dame History of Astronomy Workshop. 2009. https://www3.nd.edu/~histast/workshops/2009ndix/program.shtml

  • Notre Dame History of Astronomy Workshop. 2015. https://www3.nd.edu/~histast/workshops/2015ndxii/program.shtml

  • Overbye, Dennis. 1991. Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos: The Story of the Scientific Quest for the Secret of the Universe. New York, Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbye, Dennis. 2014. “Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim,” New York Times, 19 June, 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html

  • Palmeri, JoAnn. 2009. “Bringing Cosmos to Culture: Harlow Shapley and the Uses of Cosmic Evolution,” in Dick and Lupisella, Cosmos and Culture, pp. 489–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankenier, David W. 2013. Astrology and Cosmology in Early China: Conforming Earth to Heaven. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, Norman W. 1937. “The Meaninglessness of the terms ‘life’ and ‘living,’ in Perspectives in Biochemistry, edited by J. Needham and D. R. Green, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, Norman W. 1975. A discussion on the recognition of alien life. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma, Cyril. 1972. Exobiology. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reas, Emilie. 2014. “Small Animals Live in a Slow-Motion World,” Scientific American Mind, July 1, 2014, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/small-animals-live-in-a-slow-motion-world/. See

  • Scerri, Eric. 2008. Collected Papers on Philosophy of Chemistry. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, Eric, and Grant Fisher. 2016. Essays in the Philosophy of Chemistry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, Eric, and Lee McIntyre. 2015. Philosophy of Chemistry: Growth of a New Discipline. Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schrodinger, E. 1944. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, Harlow. 1958. Of Stars and Men, Beacon Press, Boston,104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, William. 1988. Planets and Perception: Telescopic Views and Interpretations. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Kelly. 2016. “Life is Hard: countering definitional pessimism concerning the definition of life,” International Journal of Astrobiology 15 (4): 277–289

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Matthew. 2007. Practical Mystic: Religion, Science and A. S. Eddington. University of Chicago Press: Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Woodruff T. III and John A. Baross, eds. 2007. Planets and Life: The Emerging Science of Astrobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark, Max. 2014. Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. New York: Knopf

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, Clement. 2014. The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, Eugene. 1960. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences,” in Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, No. 1. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakariya, Nasser. 2017. A Final Story: Science, Myth and Beginnings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dick, S.J. (2020). The Philosophy of Astronomy, Cosmology, and Astrobiology: A Preliminary Reconnaissance. In: Space, Time, and Aliens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41614-0_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics