Skip to main content

The Roma Community: From Marginalization to Integration and Back

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Migration, Minorities and Modernity ((MMMO,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the new Polish state policy on the Roma minority, strongly influenced by the development of the European Union policy on the Roma. In the second part of the chapter, we present a case study using ethnographic data collected over several years on changes in how non-Roma in a Polish Carpathian village describe their relations with inhabitants of a neighboring Roma settlement. We analyze certain phenomena recurring in the discourses of state officials and decision-makers responsible for implementing the Roma policy. The core element of our approach is to contrast the administrative discourse with local patterns of common-sense thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 23 June 2020

    The book was inadvertently published with corrections missed out for all the chapters. The chapters and the book corrections now has been updated with changes

Notes

  1. 1.

    A kind of a ritual exists among researchers writing about Roma minorities, which is to attempt to resolve a dilemma: Which name should be used for this social group? The choice is between “Roma” or “Gypsy”? Many current leaders of this community use only the name “Roma” and consider the term “Gypsy” pejorative and offensive. They believe that “Roma” is the proper name of this community since this name also exists in Romani, the language that the Roma speak. This claim is often linked to Roma efforts (albeit very weak) to have their scattered community acknowledged as a nation, which would be evidence of the ethnic emancipation and transformation that the community is experiencing (Mróz 2007; Głowacka-Grajper 2012). In this essay we use the term “Roma”.

  2. 2.

    Activities for the benefit of the Roma people are formed in consultation with the permanent representation of this community on the Joint Commission of Government and National and Ethnic Minorities. As part of the work of the Joint Commission, a Roma Task Force has also been established to address the special needs of this group. The Task Force comprises governmental representatives and representatives of the Roma minority organizations.

  3. 3.

    From the perspective of the Romani people of a nomadic tradition (Polish Roma, Kełderasze and Lowarzy), the Bergitka Roma did not shape their identity on the basis of the Romanipen (the Romani moral code). Relations with Bergitka Roma used to be forbidden, for fear of defilement. Since the Bergitka Roma are a sedentary community that has lived for centuries close to non-Roma communities, they have undergone changes as a result of adapting to the outside world that have led to the loss of some features of their culture.

  4. 4.

    The Department of National and Ethnic Minorities was set up within the structure of the Ministry of Interior and Administration in January 2000. It joined the Department of Religious Denominations and National or Ethnic Minorities in the Ministry of Administration and Digitization in November 2011. In November 2015, it was sent to the Ministry of Interior and Administration and was merged with the Department for Roma Minority Affairs and the National and Ethnic Minority Culture Group in April 2016.

  5. 5.

    This work is based on the authors’ long-term field research composed of participant observation and in-depth interviews (2011–2016) among Bergitka Roma in Carpathian Villages and other Roma groups, non-profit organizations offering Roma integration services, and in-depth interviews with key political actors, local authorities and government officials responsible for developing the Polish strategy for Roma integration. Most of 156 in-depth interviews were recorded and transcribed. The data served a multi-dimensional analysis of the influence of the majority society on the Roma community as well as an analysis of local relations between Roma and non-Roma people. The main goal of our work was a full understanding of changes brought about by the Polish policy on Roma integration. The interview numbers quoted in parentheses refer to the entire set of transcripts. Additionally, in Section 6.2 we quote several in-depth interviews conducted in 1993–94 by Ewa Nowicka. They are marked with a zero.

  6. 6.

    This man used a Polish verb that means “to cheat” which is an etymologically derivative of the Polish word for a Gypsy.

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (2004). Rethinking strangeness: From structures in space to discourses in civil society. Thesis Eleven, 79(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiński, G. (2004). Mniejszości narodowe i etniczne w Polsce w świetle spisu ludności z roku 2002. Studia Socjologiczne, 1, 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Z. (1995). The Roma in Macedonia: Ethnic politics and the marginal condition in a Balkan state. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(3), 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Z. (2002). The East European Gypsies. Regime change, marginality and ethnopolitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evaluation of ESF Support for Enhancing Access to the Labour Market and the Social Inclusion of Migrants and Ethnic Minorities. Roma Thematic Report, May 2011, Center for Evaluation & Strategy Services. https://ec.europa.eu/esf/BlobServlet?docId=228&langId=en. Accessed 8 Oct 2012.

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiałkowska, K., Garapich, M. P., & Mirga-Wójtowicz, E. (2018). Krytyczna analiza naukowej ciszy, czyli dlaczego Romowie migrują (z naszego pola widzenia). Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 2, 39–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheorghe, N. (2013). Choices to be made and prices to be paid: Potential roles and consequences in Roma activism and policy-making. In W. Guy (Ed.), From victimhood to citizenship: The path of Roma integration (pp. 41–100). Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Głowacka-Grajper, M. (2012). Rome people—Stateless ethnic group and the state mechanisms of culture preservation. In E. Nowicka (Ed.), The politics of culture. Perspectives of stateless nationalities/ethnic groups (pp. 83–94). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigolo, M., Hermanin, C., & Mocchel, M. (2011). Introduction: How does race “count” in fighting discrimination in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 10, 1635–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastrup, K. (1995). A passage to anthropology: Between experience and theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janusz, G. (2011). Ochrona praw mniejszości narodowych w Europie. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marie Curie-Skłodowskiej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapralski, S. (2008). Democratization in the post-communist Europe: A view from the margins. Polish Sociological Review, 163(3), 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapralski, S. (2012). Naród z popiołów. Pamięć zagłady a tożsamość Romów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. (2004). Racism and Anti-Racism in Europe. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois, J. P. (2007). Roma in Europe. Strasburg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois, J. P. (2012). The Council of Europe and Roma: 40 years of action. Strasburg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2015). European policies for social inclusion of Roma: Catch 22? Social Inclusion, 3(5), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2005). The Roma—A nation without a state? Historical background and contemporary tendencies. In W. J. Burszta, T. Kamusella, & S. Wojciechowski (Eds.), Nationalism across the globe (pp. 433–456). Tom I. Poznań: School of Humanities and Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, A. (2008). Ethnic group identity and the Roma social movement: Transnational organizing structures of representation. Nationalities Papers, 36(3), 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, A. (2011). The Roma voice in the European Union: Between national belonging and transnational identity. Social Movement Studies, 10(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirga, A. (1978). Me som Rom, tumen san gadźe. Etnografia Polska, 2, 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirga, A., & Gheorghe, N. (1997). The Roma in twenty-first century: A policy paper. Project on Ethnic Relations: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirga, A. (2005). Making the EU's anti-discrimination policy instrument work for Romani communities in the enlarged European Union. http://www.per-usa.org/Reports/Andrzej%20Mirga20_2.PDF. Accessed 10 Jan 2013.

  • Mróz, L. (1986). Wyróżnianie grupy własnej przez Cyganów w Polsce: swojskość, inność, obcość. Etnografia Polska, XXX(1), 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mróz, L. (2007). Od Cyganów do Romów - z Indii do Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: DIG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mróz, L. (2015). Roma-Gypsy presence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth 15th18th centuries. Budapest, New York: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, E. (1995). Rom jako swój i jako obcy: zbiorowość Romów w świadomości społeczności wiejskiej. Lud, 78, 357–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, E. (2003). Romowie o sobie i dla siebie. Nowe wyzwania i perspektywy. In E. Nowicka (Ed.), Romowie o sobie i dla siebie. Nowe problemy i nowe działania w pięciu krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (pp. 9–28). Warszawa: Nowy Dziennik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, E., & Witkowski, M. (2013a). Nowe możliwości – stare problemy. Przemiany w polityce wobec Romów po 1989 roku i ich społeczne konsekwencje. Studia Romologica, 6, 97–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, E., & Witkowski, M. (2013b). Retoryka antydyskryminacyjna w zmieniających się relacjach społeczeństwa większościowego z Romami. Przypadek Bergitka Roma we wsi karpackiej. Studia Socjologiczne, 4, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Nions, H. (2007). Minority rights protection in international law. The Roma of Europe. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowski, A. (1973). Cyganie. Studia nad przestępczością. Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankowski, R. (2010). The populist radical right in Poland: The patriots. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Połeć, W. (2003). Romowie na Słowacji. Marginalizacja i postęp. In E. Nowicka (Ed.), Romowie o sobie i dla siebie. Nowe problemy i nowe działania w pięciu krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (pp. 127–150). Warszawa: Instytut Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Programme for the Roma community in Poland. (2003). https://www.msw.gov.pl/portal/en/10/55/Programme_for_the_Roma_community_in_Poland.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2012.

  • Programme for the integration of the Roma community in Poland for the period 2014–2020, 2014. https://mniejszosci.narodowe.mswia.gov.pl/mne/romowie/program-integracji-spol/8675, Programme-for-the-integration-of-the-Roma-community-in-Poland-for-the-period-201.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2017.

  • Report. European Platform for Roma Inclusion. Extraordinary meeting on the national Roma integration strategies. Brussels, 22nd March 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/roma_platformreport220312_en.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2014.

  • Ruzza, C. (2004). Europe and civil society. Movement coalitions and European Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, A. (1944). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1975). Socjologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, E. (2010). Special contact mechanisms for Roma. In M. Weller., & K. Nobbs (Eds.), Political participation of minorities (pp. 503–523). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. (2012). Populism, Roma and the European politics of cultural difference. In M. Stewart (Ed.), The Gypsy Menace: Populism and the new anti-gypsy politics (pp. 3–24). London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struktura narodowo-etniczna, językowa i wyznaniowa ludności Polski. Narodowy Spis Powszechny Ludności i Mieszkań 2011. (2015). Warszawa: GUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Szewczyk, M. (2013). Unia Europejska i Romowie. System wobec kultury etnicznej. Tarnów: Muzeum Okręgowe w Tarnowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, A. D. (2010). Constructing the “Needy Subject”: NGO discourses of Roma need. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33(2), 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, P. (2006). The Roman movement: Minority politics and ethnic mobilization in contemporary central Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, M. (2016). Polityka i antropologia: praktyki integrowania Bergitka Roma w karpackich wioskach w Polsce. Kraków: NOMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, M. (2003). Romowie w Czechach. Podziały i współdziałanie. In E. Nowicka (Ed.), Romowie o sobie i dla siebie. Nowe problemy i nowe działania w pięciu krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (pp. 105–126). Warszawa: Instytut Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, M. (2008). Grupy cygańskie w międzykulturowym dyskursie na temat własnej kultury. Kultura Współczesna, 2, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wódz, K., & Witkowski M. (2013). Civil society and anti-discrimination policy in a homogenous country: The case of Poland. In S. Fella, & C. Ruzza (Eds.), Anti-racist movements in the EU. Between Europeanization and national trajectories (pp. 182–208). Londyn: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. (2011). Transnational transformations of governance: The European union and beyond. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has been financed by funding from the NCN of Poland, project number 2018/29/B/HS5/00019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Nowicka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The name of the village and the names of all individuals are fictitious in order to ensure full anonymity. The key may be obtained by contacting the authors of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nowicka, E., Witkowski, M. (2020). The Roma Community: From Marginalization to Integration and Back. In: Michna, E., Warmińska, K. (eds) Identity Strategies of Stateless Ethnic Minority Groups in Contemporary Poland. Migration, Minorities and Modernity, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41575-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41575-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41574-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41575-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics