Skip to main content

Methodologies for Framework Development for Oil Ports Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sustainability of Oil Ports

Abstract

This chapter considers the need for a new holistic approach to oil port sustainability. Sustainability is playing an increasingly important role in port management and related shipping areas due to the significant environmental and social impact of economic growth especially during periods of trade expansion. As trade has expanded ports are focusing on value-added activities as well as sustainable development. Port sustainability management need to be enhanced accordingly as many accidents harming sustainable growth have happened. Past experience indicated that in an industry that is growing, organisational and economic developments are needed not only in the most obvious areas of the sector, and consequently it is crucial to focus upon sustainability management which forms one of the most significant indirect effects of oil port growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alshenqeeti, H., 2014. Interviewing as a data collection method: a critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), pp. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J., 2005. Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), pp. 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2003. Business Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage: Newbury Park CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C., 2002. Practical Research Methods: A User-Friendly Guide to Mastering Research Techniques and Projects, How To Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. and Holland, J., 2013. What is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, M., Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C., 2012. Comparing port performance: Western European versus Eastern Asian ports. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(5), pp. 490–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkestad, B., 2008. Analysing interview data: possibilities and challenges. Eurosphere Online Working Paper Series, (13), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M.M. and Trujillo, L., 2009. Efficiency measurement in the port industry: a survey of the empirical evidence, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 43, 2, pp. 157–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L., 2006. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), pp. 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshed, S., 2014. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), pp. 87–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., 2016. Comparative studies on ports management system in Northeast Countries. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(1), pp. 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. and Chiang, B., 2014. Sustainability practices to achieve sustainability in international port operations. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 30(3), pp. 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. 2003. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In Clifford N., Cope, M. and Gillespie, T.W. (eds), Key Methods in Geography. London: Sage, pp. 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, M.R. and Rubinstein, R.L., 1995. Sampling in qualitative research: rationale, issues, and methods. Research on Ageing, 17(1), pp. 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldaña, J., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkansi, M. and Acheampong, E.A., 2012. Research philosophy debates and classifications: students’ dilemma. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(2), pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Azorin, J.F., 2012. Mixed methods research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), pp. 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, B.J., 2006. Researching Information Systems and Computing. London: Sage, p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, N.-F., 2008. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Automation in Construction, 17(8), pp. 958–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, S., Thai, V.V. and Wong, Y.D., 2016. Towards sustainable ASEAN port development: challenges and opportunities for Vietnamese ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(2), pp. 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L., 2006a. The Analytic Network Process, in T.L. Saaty and L.G. Vargas, (eds), Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. New York: Springer, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L., 2006b. The Analytic Network Process, in T.L. Saaty, and L.G. Vargas (eds), Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, New York: Springer, p. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G., 2012. How to make a decision. In C.C. Price (ed.), International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. New York: Springer, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M.N.K. and Rojon, C., 2014. There’s no madness in my method: explaining how your coaching research findings are built on firm foundations. Coaching, 7(1), pp. 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students, Prentice Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2012. Research Methods For Business Students, London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R., 2013. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C., 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulukan, H.Z. and Kop, Y., 2009. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) of solid waste collection methods using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) outputs. International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering. IEEE, pp. 584–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. and Bala, H., 2013. Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R. and Juriado, R., 2004. Customer perceptions on logistics outsourcing in the European consumer goods industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(8), pp. 628–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K., 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., 2016. Striking a balance between environmental protection and rapid development. In S. Tsang (ed.), China in the Xi Jinping Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 151–185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuemuge Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, X., Roe, M., Liu, S. (2020). Methodologies for Framework Development for Oil Ports Sustainability. In: The Sustainability of Oil Ports. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41520-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics