Skip to main content

Situational Irony in Farcical News Headlines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12037))

Abstract

Current approaches to the computational modelling of irony mostly address verbal irony and sarcasm, neglecting other productive types of irony, namely situational irony. The function of situational irony is to lay emphasis on (real or fictional) events that evoke peculiar and unexpected images, which usually create a comical effect on the audience. In this paper, we investigate the linguistic and rhetorical devices underlying this phenomenon in a corpus composed of farcical news headlines, aiming at its automatic recognition. Based on a thorough annotation study, we found that in news headlines unexpectedness is mainly achieved by combining terms from different conceptual domains (what we have called out-of-domain contrast). We then explored features for automatically identifying these semantic and pragmatic incongruities and evaluated their discriminating power in a corpus whose irony is expressed by means of out-of-domain contrast. The features explored in our experiments are globally effective in capturing this phenomenon, attaining a six percent improvement in terms of the F-Measure over a baseline that only considers lexical information. Moreover, we observed that the best features typically reported in the literature for identifying incongruity in sarcastic text are not relevant for detecting situational irony in farcical news, thus reinforcing the idea that these phenomena pose different challenges that require distinct modelling approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://inimigo.publico.pt/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.publico.pt/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.programmableweb.com/api/sapo-agenda.

  4. 4.

    https://www.nltk.org/.

  5. 5.

    http://labs.sapo.pt/2011/02/verbetes/.

  6. 6.

    English lemmas were automatically translated into Portuguese using the Google API client for Google Translate.

References

  1. Amir, S., Wallace, B., Lyu, H., Carvalho, P., Silva, M: Modelling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 167–177. ACL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bamman, D., Smith, N.: Contextualized sarcasm detection on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web and Social Media, pp. 574–577. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouma, G.: Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the German Society for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, pp. 31–40 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burfoot, C., Baldwin, T.: Automatic satire detection: are you having a laugh? In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 161–164. ACL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Teixeira, J., Silva, M.: Liars and saviors in a sentiment annotated corpus of comments to political debates. In: Proceedings of 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 564–568. ACL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 107–116. ACL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dews, S., Kaplan, J., Winner, E.: Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Process. 19(3), 347–367 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dynel, M.: The irony of irony: irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmat. 1, 3–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbs, R.: Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor Symb. 15(1), 2–27 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs, R.: A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. J. Pragmat. 34(4), 457–486 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joshi, A., Bhattacharyya, P., Carman, M.: Automatic sarcasm detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 50(5), 73 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joshi, A., Sharma, V., Bhattacharyya, P.: Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 757–762. ACL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khattri, A., Joshi, A., Bhattacharyya, P., Carman, M.: Your sentiment precedes you: using an author’s historical tweets to predict sarcasm. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pp. 25–30. ACL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kreuz, R., Caucci, G.: Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language, pp. 1–4. ACL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kreuz, R., Roberts, R.: On satire and parody: the importance of being ironic. Metaphor Symb. 8(2), 97–109 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krippendorff, K.: Reliability in content analysis. Hum. Commun. Res. 30(3), 411–433 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lucariello, J.: Situational irony: a concept of events gone awry. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123(2), 129 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Burges, C.J.C, Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119. Curran Associates, Inc. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reyes, A., Rosso, P., Veale, T.: A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Lang. Resour. Eval. 47(1), 239–268 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., Silva, L., Gilbert, N., Huang, R.: Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 704– 714. ACL (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rubin, V., Chen, Y., Conroy, N.: Deception detection for news: three types of fakes. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–4 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva, M.J., Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L.: Building a sentiment lexicon for social judgement mining. In: Caseli, H., Villavicencio, A., Teixeira, A., Perdigão, F. (eds.) PROPOR 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7243, pp. 218–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Soares, A., Comesana, M., Pinheiro, A., Simões, A., Frade, C.: The adaptation of the affective norms for English words (anew) for European Portuguese. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1), 256–269 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In: Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959, pp. 1–32 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind Lang. 17(1–2), 3–23 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallace, B.: Computational irony: a survey and new perspectives. Artif. Intell. Rev. 43(4), 467–483 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallace, B.: Sparse, contextually informed models for irony detection: exploiting user communities, entities and sentiment. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1035–1044. ACL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wallace, B., Choe, D., Kertz, L., Charniak, E.: Humans require context to infer ironic intent (so computers probably do, too). In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 512–516. ACL (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Warriner, A., Kuperman, V., Brysbaert, M.: Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 45(4), 1191–1207 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson, D., Sperber, D.: On verbal irony. Lingua 87, 53–76 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, through the projects EXPRESS (UTAP-EXPL/EEI-ESS/0031/2014) and DARGMINTS (PCI-01-0155-FEDER-031460), and also through the INESC-ID multiannual funding (UID/CEC/50021/2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carvalho, P., Martins, B., Rosa, H., Amir, S., Baptista, J., Silva, M.J. (2020). Situational Irony in Farcical News Headlines. In: Quaresma, P., Vieira, R., Aluísio, S., Moniz, H., Batista, F., Gonçalves, T. (eds) Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language. PROPOR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12037. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41505-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41505-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41504-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41505-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics