Abstract
Industrial hemp has a long history of use in the U.S.A. Historically the crop was grown for fiber for home use as well as for ship cordage, rigging and sails, and this made the crop of strategic importance. The end of slavery, changing technologies, and other competing fibers all played roles in hemp’s decline as an important commodity in the U.S.A., but prohibition through various federal legislation essentially created a 70-year hiatus for the crop. Changes in U.S. federal legislation have made hemp once again legal, and the crop is returning to production fields. However, this time around the majority of effort with the crop is for flowers production. Most regions of the country have seen rapid expansion of acres in hemp flower production, largely due to the potential returns significantly greater than possible with other commodity crops. Opportunities for other hemp products – i.e., grain and fiber – remain more restricted as processing capacity, particularly for fibers, is limited. However, regions such as the Mid-West and Great Plains are likely to be able to grow hemp grain in rotation with other crops given that this part of the U.S.A. has grain suitable infrastructure capable of handling hemp. Both long-term farmers and agricultural neophytes are engaging in efforts to grow hemp flowers, and it is likely that the market for cannabidiol (CBD) hemp growers will remain volatile over the next few years. Still-evolving Federal guidelines provides further uncertainty to these markets. Current production models rely on labor-intensive production, harvest and processing systems, and the application of technologies such as mechanization is likely to introduce significant changes in costs, value, and opportunity for this new industry. To date, research has largely focused on plant varieties and management. Efforts to address issues such as low seed vigor and seed shatter would likely have value across all hemp production systems. Research work also is being conducted on disease resistance and management, weed management and herbicide susceptibility. After a long interruption, U.S.A. efforts to improve industrial hemp are in the beginning stages of an exciting new chapter for this crop.
Author David W. Williams deceased at the time of publication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- CBD:
-
Cannabidiol
- THC:
-
Δ9 Tetrahydrocannabinol
References
Bidwell PW, Falconer JI (1941) History of agriculture in the northern United States, 1620–1860, Carnegie Institute of Washington. Publication; no. 358. P. Smith Publisher, New York
Clithero G (2018) Registered hemp growers and acreage in production. Vermont center for geographic information and Vermont agency of agriculture, food, and markets
Dewey LH (1902) The hemp industry in the United States. Yearbook of the Unites States Department of Agriculture – 1901. Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 541–554
Dewey LH (1914) Hemp. Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture – 1913. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 283–346
Dewey LH (1928) Hemp varieties of improved type are result of selection. In: What’s new in agriculture. Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture – 1927. Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 357–360
Duvall C (2014) Cannabis. Reaktion Books/University of Chicago Press, London, p 264
Haney JG (1919) American hemp -a new crop and weed fighter. In: Six years’ results on IHC demonstration farms. International Harvester Co, Racine, pp 11–12
Howard HV, Lang AL, Enfield GH (1946) Effects of fertilizers on yields and breaking strengths of American hemp Cannabis sativa. J Am Soc Agron 38:551–563
Johnson P (1999) Industrial hemp: a critical review of claimed potentials for Cannabis sativa. TAPPI J 82:113–123
Johnson R (2013) Hemp as an agricultural commodity. CRS Report for Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
National Conference of State Legislatures (2019) State industrial hemp statutes. Webpage. Available at http://www.ncsl.org/research/agriculture-and-rural-development/state-industrial-hemp-statutes.aspx. Updated 1 February 2019
Robinson BB (1943) Hemp. United States Department of Agriculture Farmer’s Bulletin no. 1935
Small E, Pocock T, Cavers PB (2003) The biology of Canadian weeds. 119. Cannabis sativa L. Can J Plant Sci 83:217–237. https://doi.org/10.4141/P02-021
State of Rhode Island (2019) Approved industrial hemp licenses. Department of Business Regulation. Retrieved from: http://www.dbr.ri.gov/divisions/medicalmarijuana/hemp_approvals.php
USDA (2000) Industrial hemp in the United States: status and market potential. In: AgEcon search, research in agricultural & applied economics. Economic Research Service, p 43. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278840
Vermont Agency of Agriculture (2019). https://agriculture.vermont.gov/event/2019-industrial-hemp-conference
Wilsie CP, Black CA, Aandahl AR (1944) Hemp production experiments, cultural practices, and soil requirements, Iowa agricultural experiment station bulletin. Iowa State College, Ames, p 63
Wright AH (1918) Wisconsin’s hemp industry. In: Agricultural experiment station of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, May 1948, p 47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fike, J.H., Darby, H., Johnson, B.L., Smart, L., Williams, D.W. (2020). Industrial Hemp in the USA: A Brief Synopsis. In: Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 42. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41384-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41384-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41383-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41384-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)