Advertisement

Contemporary Issues for Design and Innovation Studies

Chapter
  • 153 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to respond to the challenges set by the editors of this series: to stimulate debate and push boundaries in technology education. The sections are written in the form of vignettes for consideration and reflection by teachers and instructors. The beginning of each vignette places it within the context of the preceding chapters of the book and considers the implications for teaching. Suggestions for discussion and further study are offered after each vignette. The topics have been assembled from the author’s research into the management, theory, philosophy and teaching of design and innovation. They are grouped into two areas in line with the book’s taxonomy: practical considerations and principles affecting the underpinning of teaching design and innovation. The list is personal and by no means exhaustive. It is designed to provide a primer for debate among teachers, researchers and others interested in the topic. Furthermore, the chapter aims to contribute to a research agenda in order to provide an impetus for developing more detailed studies in the area.

References

  1. Bailey, J. I. (2014). Enframing the flesh: Heidegger, transhumanism, and the body as “standing reserve”. Journal of Evolution & Technology, 24(2), 44–66.Google Scholar
  2. Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2011). Macintyre, neo-aristotelianism and organization theory. In H. Tsoukas & R. Chia (Eds.), Philosophy and organization theory research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 32, pp. 85–121). Emerald Publishing Limited. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmit/detail.action?docID=662385. Created from GMIT on 2018-12-19 08:24:44.
  3. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (1999). Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable? London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Biberman, J., Whitty, M., & Robins, L. (1999). Lessons from Oz: Balance and wholeness in organisations. Journal of Organizational Change, 12(3), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogen, J. (2005). The Vienna Circle (Wiener Kreis). In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2008). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brittan, G. G. J. (1999). Enlightenment. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 266). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  9. Costello, G. J., & Donnellan, B. (2007). The diffusion of WOZ: Expanding the topology of IS innovations. Journal of Information Technology, 22(1), 79–86.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Critchley, S. (2001). Continental philosophy: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahlin, B. (2012). Our posthuman futures and education: Homo Zappiens, Cyborgs, and the New Adam. Futures, 44(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daintith, J., & Gjertsen, D. (Eds.). (1999). Oxford dictionary of scientists (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. (2017). Teaching design: A guide to curriculum and pedagogy for college design faculty and teachers who use design in their classrooms. New York: Allworth.Google Scholar
  14. Dimache, A., & Roche, T. (2013). A decision methodology to support servitisation of manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(11/12), 1435–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DJSI. (2019). Dow Jones sustainability index family available on line through https://www.robecosam.com/csa/indices/?r. Accessed July 2019.
  16. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2005). Think, play, do: Technology, innovation, and organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1990). Making a mind versus modelling the brain: Artificial intelligence back at the branch point. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence (Oxford readings in philosophy) ((July 12, 1990) reprinted 2005, 1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1137–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EC. (2018). Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems by the European Group on ethics in science and new technologies: European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forlano, L. (2017). Posthumanism and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 16–29.Google Scholar
  22. Fotion, N. (2005). Logical positivism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state (2nd ed.). London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, B. S. (2012). The unintended reformation: How a religious revolution secularized society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  25. Guignon, C. B. (1999). Heidegger, Martin. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 610). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, B. A. (2002). The fable of the allegory: The wizard of Oz in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 33(3), 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology The Question Concerning Technology: And Other Essays (pp. 3-35). New York & London Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Hirschheim, R. A., Klein, H.-K., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling : conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue ethics, In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/.
  30. Inwood, M. J. (2005a). Enlightenment. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 252–253). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Inwood, M. J. (2005b). Heidegger, Martin. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 371–375). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Jrade, A., & Jalaei, F. (2013). Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage. Building Simulation, 6(4), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. (2008). Personal praxis: Learning through experience. In P. S. P. Salo & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (2nd ed., pp. 15–36). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenny, A. (2010). A new history of western philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kerlin, M. J. (1997). Peter French, corporate ethics and the wizard of Oz. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1431–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, M. L. (1951). Jacques Maritain. In The papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (available on-line through https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/jacques-maritain. Accessed Dec 2019: Stanford: The Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute.
  37. Klein, M. (2005). Responsibility. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 815–816). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  38. Kline, S. J. (2002). What is technology? In R. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Kraut, R. (2018). Aristotle’s ethics. Available online through https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/aristotle-ethics/. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition).
  40. Krumdieck, S. (2020). Transition engineering : Building a sustainable future. Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lacy, A. (2005). Positivism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2002). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Macquarrie, J. (1968). Martin Heidegger. Richmond, Virginia: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  44. MacIntyre, A. C. (2002). A short history of ethics : A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the 20th century. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd..Google Scholar
  45. MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After Virtue (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
  46. Maritain, J. (1932). An introduction to philosophy (translated by E.I. Watkin). London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  47. Maritain, J. (2002). The person and the common good (translated by John J. Fitzgerald). University of Notre Dame Press; New Impression edition (October 31, 1973).Google Scholar
  48. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Murphy, M. C. (Ed.). (2003). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  50. Murphy, J. B. (1999). Common good. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 915). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. O'Brien, J. A., & Marakas, G. M. (2009). Management information systems. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  52. ODE. (2006a). technology. In Oxford dictionary of english (Revised, 2 ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. ODE. (2006b). vignette. In Oxford dictionary of english (Revised, 2 ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pfaffenberger, B. (2002). Computers in your future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Post, G. V., & Anderson, D. L. (2003). Management information systems : Solving business problems with information technology. Boston/London: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  56. Potapova, A., & Rodionov, S. (2014). Universal empathy and ethical bias for artificial general intelligence. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pryshlakivsky, J., & Searcy, C. (2013). Sustainable Development as a Wicked Problem In S. F. Kovacic & A. Sousa-Poza (Eds.), Managing and Engineering in Complex Situations (pp. 109-128). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  58. Pullen, A., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fisscher, O. A. M. (2012). Open innovation in practice: Goal complementarity and closed NPD networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 917–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robson, W. (1997). Strategic management and information systems : An integrated approach (2nd ed.). London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  62. Scruton, R. (2004). Modern philosophy: An introduction and survey. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  63. Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  64. Skaburskis, A. (2008). The Origin of “Wicked Problems”. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(2), 277–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802041654.
  65. Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17(1), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slife, B. D., & Richardson, F. C. (2011). The relativism of social constructionism. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 24(4), 333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2011.593475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, A. (1796). Book V, Chapter I: Of the expences of the sovereign or commonwealth. In E. Cannan (Ed.), An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Available online through http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Smith/smWN.html) (1904. 5 ed.). London: Methuen and, Ltd.Google Scholar
  68. Sweet, W. (2004). Jacques Maritain. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/maritain/Google Scholar
  69. Uebel, T. (1999). Vienna Circle. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (p. 915). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2006). Open innovation in value networks. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 258–284). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  71. Waliaula, A. J. (2013). Positivism. Salem Press Encyclopedia research starters, EBSCOhost. Accessed 27 March 2018.Google Scholar
  72. Ward, J., Griffiths, P., & Whitmore, P. (1990). Strategic planning for information systems. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  73. WBCSD. (2019). World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) avialable on-line through https://www.wbcsd.org/. Accessed July 2019.
  74. Weber, R. (2003a). Editor’s comments : The problem of the problem. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), iii–ix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber, R. (2003b). Editor’s comments : Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), iii–xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii–xiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wernick, A. (2001). Auguste Comte and the religion of humanity: The post-theistic program of French Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost, viewed 27 March 2018.Google Scholar
  78. West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A research agenda. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 258–284). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  79. Willis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost, viewed 22 March 2018.Google Scholar
  80. Wilson, J. Q. (1966). Innovation in organizations: Notes toward a theory. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organizational design (pp. 193–218). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  81. Yearworth, M. (2016). Sustainability as a ‘super-wicked’ problem; opportunities and limits for engineering methodology. Intelligent Buildings International, 8(1), 37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2015.1109789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Galway-Mayo Institute of TechnologyGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations