Abstract
Forensic science has the ability and capacity to be an active participant in investigations, rather than its traditional passive role. Too often, the evidence is collected, submitted to the laboratory, and the investigators wait for results, creating a lag between when the information is needed and when it is made available. Obstacles to forensic service providers being actively involved in investigations include organizational cultural norms, operational resources, sworn and civilian human resource issues, and media-driven expectations of outcomes. While traditional intelligence analysis is forecasting, forensic science and criminal investigations are reconstructive and this alters which methods can be and how to improve investigations. What has been characterized as forensic intelligence in the literature is largely forensic support to crime analysis. The benefits to using actual forensic intelligence actively in investigations by shifting forensic results, even if preliminary, to the front-end of the criminal justice system, are reduced wrongful arrests and convictions, more efficient use of policing resources, and stronger cases for adjudication. An integrated forensic intelligence model (IFIM) is offered as a roadmap to creating a sustained professional culture of forensic intelligence.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
The Continental Congress created the Committee of Secret Correspondence in 1775 to collect intelligence from people in England, Ireland, and Europe to help in the war effort. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-22-02-0167
- 3.
California, Hawaii, Indiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma and Texas. Almost all state forensic laboratories (99%) are accredited.
- 4.
References
Benson, W., Stacy, J., & Whorley, M. (Eds.). (1968). Systems analysis of criminalistics and forensic science. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
Burcher, M., & Whelan, C. (2019). Intelligence-led policing in practice: Reflections from intelligence analysts. Police Quarterly, 22(2), 139–160.
Carter, D. L. (2004). Law enforcement intelligence: A guide for state, local and tribal law. Washington, DC: Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.
Childs, R. A., Witt, T. S., & Nur-tegin, K. (2009). Survey of forensic service providers. Forensic Science Policy and Management, 1(1), 49–56.
Deedrick, D. (2001). Fabric processing and “nubs”. In M. Houck (Ed.), Mute witnesses: Trace evidence analysis (pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press.
Durose, M. R., Burch, A. M., Walsh, K., & Tiry, E. (2016). Publicly funded forensic crime laboratories: Resources and services, 2014. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
Federation of American Scientists (FAS). (1996). Operations security intelligence threat handbook. Interagency OPSEC Support Staff. fas.org/irp/nsa/ioss/threat96/index.html
Fong, W. (1975). Criminalistics and the prosecutor. In J. L. Peterson (Ed.), Forensic science: Scientific investigation in criminal justice (pp. 371–394). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Fosdick, R. B. (1969). American police systems. Patterson Smith Reprint of a Century Company Work.
Freeman, J., Turchie, T., & Noel, D. (2018). UNABOMBER: How the FBI broke its own rules to capture the terrorist Ted Kaczynski. New York: History Publishing Company.
Gerringer, A., & Bart, J. (2016). Law Enforcement Intelligence. In P. Oleson (Ed.), AFIO’s guide to the study of intelligence (pp. 321–326). Falls Church: Association of Former Intelligence Officers.
Global Advisory Committee. (2013). National Criminal Intelligence sharing plan: Building a national capability for effective criminal intelligence development and the nationwide sharing of intelligence and information. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
Guidetti, R. (2009). Collaborative intelligence production. In J. Ratcliffe (Ed.), Strategic thinking in criminal intelligence (pp. 222–234). Sydney: The Federation Press.
Heuer, R. J., & Pherson, R. H. (2015). Structured techniques for intelligence analysis.
Houck, M. (Ed.). (2001). Mute witnesses: Trace evidence analysis. London: Academic Press.
Houck, M. (Ed.). (2004). Trace evidence analysis: More cases in mute witnesses. London: Academic Press.
Houck, M. (2006). CSI: Reality. Scientific American, 295(1), 84–89.
Houck, M., & Siegel, J. (2015). Fundamentals of forensic science. London: Academic Press.
International Association of Chiefs of Police and US Department of Homeland Security. (2002) Criminal intelligence sharing: A national plan for intelligence-led policing at the local, state and federal levels. https://it.ojp.gov/documents/National_Criminal_Intelligence_Sharing_Plan.pdf
Ishiyama, J., & Breuning, M. (2010). 21st century political science: A reference. London: Sage.
Johnson, H. A., Wolfe, N. T., & Jones, M. (2008). History of criminal justice (4th ed.). Newark: Matthew Bender.
Legrand, T., & Vogel, L. (2014). The landscape of forensic intelligence research. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(1), 16–26.
Lowenthal, M. (2006). Intelligence: From secrets to policy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Michaud, A. (2001). Trace evidence as investigative lead value. In M. Houck (Ed.), Mute witnesses: Trace evidence analysis (pp. 49–68). London: Academic Press.
Milne, R. (2012). Forensic intelligence. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Morelato, M., Beavis, A., Tahtouh, M., Ribaux, O., Kirkbride, P., & Roux, C. (2013). The use of forensic case data in intelligence-led policing: the example of drug profiling. Forensic Science International, 226(1–3), 1–9.
Morelato, M., Baechler, S., Ribaux, O., Beavis, A., Tahtouh, M., Kirkbride, P., et al. (2014). Forensic intelligence framework—Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. Forensic Science International, 236, 181–190.
National Academy of Sciences National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the U.S.: A path forward. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences National Research Council.
Parker, B., & Peterson, J. (1970). Physical evidence utilization in the administration of criminal justice. Berkeley: School of Criminology, University of California.
Perkins, R. (1942). Elements of police science. Chicago: The Foundation Press.
Ratcliffe, J. (2003). Intelligence-led policing. In Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice (Vol. 248). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2016). Intelligence-led policing. Routledge.
Ribaux, O., & Wright, B. T. (2014). Expanding forensic science through forensic intelligence. Science & Justice, 54(6), 494–501.
Ribaux, O., Walsh, S. J., & Margot, P. (2006). The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence. Forensic Science International, 156(2–3), 171–181.
Ribaux, O., Baylon, A., Roux, C., Delémont, O., Lock, E., Zingg, C., & Margot, P. (2010). Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence. Forensic Science International, 195(1-3), 10–16.
Ross, A. (2015). Elements of a forensic intelligence model. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(1), 8–15.
Speaker, P. J. (2013). Forensic science service provider models: data-driven support for better delivery options. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(4), 398–406.
U.S. Department of Justice, International Association of Chiefs of Police, & US Department of Homeland Security. (2008). National summit on intelligence: Gathering, sharing, analysis, and use after 9–11. www.theiacp.org/resources/national-summit-on-intelligence-gathering-sharing-analysis-and-use-after-9-11
Walsh, S., Moss, D., Kliem, C., & Vintiner, G. (2002). The collation of forensic DNA case data into a multi-dimensional intelligence database. Science & Justice, 42(4), 205–214.
Williams, R. (1975). In J. L. Peterson (Ed.), Forensic science–The present and the future, in Forensic science: Scientific investigation in criminal justice (pp. 126–148). AMS Press, Inc.: New York.
Wilson, C. (1975). Crime detection laboratories in the United States. In J. L. Peterson (Ed.), Forensic science: Scientific investigations in criminal justice (pp. 96–108). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Houck, M.M. (2020). Front-End Forensics: An Integrated Forensic Intelligence Model. In: Fox, B., Reid, J., Masys, A. (eds) Science Informed Policing. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41287-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41287-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41286-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41287-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)