Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Pragmatics of Revision
  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

This offers an overview of what has been established during the course of the study in relation to its main themes: George Moore’s creative process and development, the significance of literary rewriting in general as a deliberate, communicative act, and the contribution that pragmatic theory can make to our understanding of the relationship established between a literary text and its readers. It argues that Moore’s various acts of rewriting were not simply processes of ‘updating’ older works. Rather, they can be seen as significant components in their own right in the way in which he developed as a writer and fulfilled his distinct intentions for each of his works of prose fiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Frazier, A. (2014). The Fin de Siecle Meets French Realism. Moore, Balzac, and the Peculiarity of Writers. In A. Heilmann & M. Llewellyn (Eds.), George Moore. Influence and Collaboration (pp. 27–37). Newark: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettmann, R. A. (1944). George Moore’s Revisions of The Lake, The Wild Goose, and Esther Waters. PMLA, 59, 540–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, K. (1930). Esther Waters Revisited. In M. Murray (Ed.), Novels and Novelists (pp. 233–237). London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1897, July). A Tragic Novel. Cosmopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1919). Avowals. London: Cumann Sean-eolais na h-Eireann [Heinemann, 1924].

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1921). Héloïse and Abélard. London: Cumann Sean-eolais na h-Eireann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1926). Ulick and Soracha. London: Nonesuch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, G. (1966). A Study of George Moore’s Revisions of his Novels and Short Stories. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R. (1982a). Preface. In R. Welch (Ed.), The Way Back George Moore’s The Untilled Field & The Lake (pp. 7–12). Dublin: Wolfhound Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, H. (1934). Portraits by Inference. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siobhan Chapman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chapman, S. (2020). Conclusions. In: The Pragmatics of Revision. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41268-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41268-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41267-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41268-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics