Abstract
We empirically test the concomitant cognitive and behavioral responses to identity verifying and non-verifying feedback. Based on identity theory, we expect that those who experience identity non-verification will enact behaviors aimed at resisting the non-verifying feedback, while at the same time their situated self-view will slowly change in the direction of that feedback (Burke and Stets 2009). Both responses co-occur as individuals behave to counteract the non-verifying meanings, even while their self-view shifts in the direction of the non-verifying meanings of the feedback. We examine these dual responses for people in structurally powerless positions who have less influence and perhaps greater difficulty effectively responding to identity non-verification. In a controlled laboratory experiment, actors who are either higher or lower in their dominant person identity, and whose dominance identity is either verified or not verified, bargain with two simulated actors over the distribution of a pool of resources. The results support the identity theory expectations that, in response to identity non-verification, people attempt to alter situational meanings as well as slowly accommodate to them.
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (SES-1419517) to the first three authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, C. N., & Wiley, M. G. (1981). Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 269–289). New York: Basic Books Inc.
Asencio, E. K., & Burke, P. J. (2011). Does incarceration change the criminal identity? A synthesis of labeling and identity theory perspectives on identity change. Sociological Perspectives, 54, 163–182.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.
Burke, P. J. (2006). Identity change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 81–96.
Burke, P. J., & Cast, A. D. (1997). Stability and change in the gender identities of newly married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 277–290.
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347–366.
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cast, A. D. (2003). Power and the ability to define the situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 185–201.
Cast, A. D., & Cantwell, A. M. (2007). Identity change in newly married couples: Effects of positive and negative feedback. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 172–185.
Cast, A. D., Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1999). Does the self conform to the views of others? Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 68–82.
Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.
Cooley, C. H. ([1902] 1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40.
Felson, R. B. (1980). Communication barriers and the reflected appraisal process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 223–233.
Kinch, J. W. (1963). A formalized theory of the self-concept. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 481–486.
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89–108.
Markovsky, B., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Erger, J. (1993). The seeds of weak power: An extension of network exchange theory. American Sociological Review, 58, 197–209.
Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
Matsueda, R. L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577–1611.
McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.
Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2006). Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Social Forces, 84, 2331–2352.
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 205–242.
Savage, S. V., & Sommer, Z. L. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? How the form of exchange affects whether disadvantaged actors remain in networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79, 115–135.
Savage, S. V., Stets, J. E., Burke, P. J., & Sommer, Z. L. (2017). Identity and power use in exchange networks. Sociological Perspectives, 59, 510–528.
Stets, J. E. (2003). Justice, emotion, and identity theory. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, P. A. Thoits, & R. Serpe (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 105–122). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Inconsistent self-views in the control identity model. Social Science Research, 23, 236–262.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2005). Identity-verification, control, and aggression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 160–178.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). Emotions and identity nonverification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 387–410.
Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77, 120–140.
Stets, J. E., & Harrod, M. M. (2004). Verification across multiple identities: The role of status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 155–171.
Stryker, S. (2002 [1980]). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press.
Swann, W. B., Jr., & Hill, C. A. (1982). When our identities are mistaken: Reaffirming self-conceptions through social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 59–66.
Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). New York: Guilford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stets, J.E., Savage, S.V., Burke, P.J., Fares, P. (2020). Cognitive and Behavioral Responses to the Identity Verification Process. In: Serpe, R.T., Stryker, R., Powell, B. (eds) Identity and Symbolic Interaction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41230-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41231-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)