Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the development of symbolic interaction and identity theory as a prelude to introducing the theoretical and methodological advances to these traditions contributed by authors of subsequent chapters in this book. Built on the pioneering work of George Herbert Mead and others, symbolic interactionism focuses on the reciprocal relationship between self and society, in which shared meanings constructed through interaction with others influence social behavior. Where the paradigm originally centered on analyzing micro-social encounters, highlighting specific characteristics of situations and actors, over time it extended its focus to understanding patterns in interaction across situations and time, suggesting that social structure explained these patterns. In the late 1960s, Sheldon Stryker began to codify the premises of structural symbolic interaction. From this, identity theory developed and, over the next five decades, came to encompass both structural and perceptual research agendas. Where the former elucidates behavioral processes relating hierarchies of identity salience structuring the self to patterns of identity commitments and role behaviors, the situational enactments of which are embedded in networks, groups and social institutions, the latter elucidates perceptual control processes exercised by the mind in response to the feedback that self receives from others in interaction. Over time, identity theory’s initial focus on role identities broadened to include group identities and person identities, and bridges developed between identity theory and other theories and paradigms in sociology and the social sciences more generally. These include bridges to theories such as affect control theory and identity accumulation theory, built upon symbolic interactionist premises, and bridges to theories and paradigms beyond symbolic interactionism, including exchange theory and social identity theory. The chapter ends with a preview of ideas and findings developed in the rest of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards and blackboards: College athletes and role engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Berger, J., Connor, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York, NY: Elsevier.
Berger, J., & Webster, M., Jr. (2018). Expectations, status, and behavior. In Peter J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (2nd ed., pp. 281–314). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bergstrand, K. (2019). The advantaged cause: Affect control theory and social movements. Socius, 5, 1–15.
Blumer, H. (1937). Social psychology. In E. P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144–198). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Brenner, P. S., Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2014). The causal ordering of prominence and salience in identity theory: An empirical examination. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 231–252.
Brenner, P. S., Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2018). Role-specific self-efficacy as precedent and product of the identity model. Sociological Perspectives, 61, 57–80.
Bryson, G. (1945). Man and society: The Scottish inquiry of the eighteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self-measurement implications from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.
Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836–849.
Burke, P. J. (2004). Identity and social structure: The 2007 Cooley-Mead award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 5–15.
Burke, P. J. (2012). The Indiana school of symbolic interaction. Keynote Address at the Couch-Stone Symposium of the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction, Evanston, IL.
Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1980). College student identity: Measurement and implications. Pacific Sociological Review, 23, 46–66.
Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 239–251.
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burke, P. J., & Stryker, S. (2016). Identity theory: Progress in relating two strands. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 657–681). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cook, K., & Rice, E. (2003). Social exchange theory. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 53–76). New York, NY: Springer.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. New York, NY: Scribner’s Sons.
Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). New York, NY: Springer.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection (1st ed.). London: John Murray.
Dewey, J. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York, NY: Modern Library.
Goffman, E. (1964). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gollob, H. F. (1968). Impression formation and word combination in sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 341–353.
Gollob, H. F., & Rossman, B. (1973). Judgements of an actor’s power and ability to influence others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 391–406.
Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis in western sociology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Heise, D. R. (1969). Affective dynamics in simple sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 204–213.
Heise, D. R. (1970). Potency dynamics in simple sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Heise, D. R. (1986). Modeling symbolic interaction. In J. S. Coleman, S. Lindenberg, & S. Nowak (Eds.), Approaches to social theory (pp. 291–309). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111–136). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.
Huber, J. (1973). Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review, 38, 274–284.
James, W. (1890). Principals of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
Joas, H. (1987). Symbolic interactionism. In A. Giddens & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 82–115). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kalkhoff, W., Marcussen, K., & Serpe, R. T. (2016a). To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions. Social Science Research, 58, 14–33.
Kalkhoff, W., Serpe, R. T., Pollock, J., Miller, B., & Pfeiffer, M. (2016b). Neural processing of identity-relevant feedback: An electroencephalographic study. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 195–2018). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, M. H. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociological Quarterly, 5, 68–76.
Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76.
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.
Lawler, E. J. (2003). Interaction, emotion, and collective identity. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 135–150). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 616–657.
MacKinnon, N. J. (1994). Symbolic interaction as affect control. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Markowski, K. L., & Serpe, R. T. (2018). Identity theory paradigm integration: Assessing the role of prominence and salience in the verification and self-esteem relationship. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 35, pp. 75–102).
Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 63–78.
McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York, NY: Free Press.
McLeod, J. D. (2012). The meanings of stress: Expanding the stress process model. Society and Mental Health, 2, 172–186.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10–28.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning (Vol. 1). Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 477–499.
Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.
Ridgeway, C. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367–386.
Ridgeway, C. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, D., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1992). Selective interaction as a strategy for identity maintenance: An affect control model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 12–28.
Robinson, D., Smith-Lovin, L., & Wisecup, A. K. (2008). Affect control theory. In J. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 179–202). Springer.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Savage, S. V., Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Fares, P. (2019). The fairness identity and the emergence of inequality. Social Science Research, 81, 144–156.
Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in self: A symbolic interactionist explanation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 44–55.
Serpe, R. T. (1991). The cerebral self: Thinking and planning about identity-relevant activity. In J. A. Howard & P. L. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 55–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 41–82). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1993). Prior social ties and movement into new social relationships. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, J. O’Brian, & K. Heimer (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 10, pp. 283–304). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 225–248). London, UK: Springer.
Simon, R. W. (1995). Gender, multiple roles, role meanings, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 182–194.
Smith, H. W., Jakanori, M., & Shunichirou, I. (2001). The affective basis of attributional processes among Japanese and Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 180–194.
Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Impressions from events. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13, 35–70.
Smith-Lovin, L., & Heise, D. R. (1988). Analyzing social interaction: Advances in affect control theory. New York: Gordon and Breach.
Stets, J. E. (2006). Identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 88–110). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2005). New directions in identity control theory. In Advances in group processes (Vol. 22, pp. 43–64).
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). Emotions and identity nonverification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 387–410.
Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2011). The moral self: Applying identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 192–215.
Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77, 120–140.
Stets, J. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). Identity theory. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 31–60). New York, NY: Springer.
Stets, J. E., & Turner, J. H. (2006). Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York, NY: Springer.
Stryker, R., & Stryker, S. (2016). Is Mead’s framework still sound? In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 31–57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Stryker, R., Conway-Silva, B., & Kaul, V. (2019). Calling out our own? Shared vs. oppositional partisanship and perceptions of political incivility. Paper presented at National Institute for Civil Discourse (NICD) Workshop, September 26–28, 2019.
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.
Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in two social psychologies: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145–160.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.
Stryker, S. (1980/2000). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings/Blackburn.
Stryker, S. (1989). The two psychologies: Additional thoughts. Social Forces, 68, 45–54.
Stryker, S. (1997). In the beginning, there is society: Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315–327). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Stryker, S. (2000). Identity competition: Key to differential social movement involvement? In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Stryker, S. (2004). Integrating emotion into identity theory. In J. Turner (Ed.), Theory and research on human emotions (pp. 1–24). New York/London: Elsevier.
Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.
Stryker, S., & Burke, J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience and role behavior. In W. Ickes & E. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1983). Toward a theory of family influence in the socialization of children. In A. C. Kerchoff (Ed.), Research in sociology of education and socialization: Personal change over the life course (Vol. 4, pp. 47–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16–34.
Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2003). The symbolic interactionist frame. In J. D. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–28). New York: Kluwer-Plenum.
Stryker, S., Serpe, R. T., & Hunt, M. O. (2005). Making good on a promise: The impact of larger social structures on commitments. In S. I. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 22, pp. 93–124). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48, 174–187.
Thoits, P. A. (2003). Personal agency in the accumulation of multiple role identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 179–194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Thoits, P. A., & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identities. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 106–133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, W. I. (1925). The behavior pattern and situation. Publications of the American Sociological Society, 22, 1–14.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America. Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1985). Do sociological theories grow? American Journal of Sociology, 90, 697–728.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Serpe, R.T., Stryker, R., Powell, B. (2020). Structural Symbolic Interaction and Identity Theory: The Indiana School and Beyond. In: Serpe, R.T., Stryker, R., Powell, B. (eds) Identity and Symbolic Interaction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41230-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41231-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)