Internet Communication Technology (ICT) for Deliberative Democracy

  • Iyad Muhsen AlDajani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)


Having researched moderation in Palestine and Wasatia as a movement, the democracy described in the Wasatia cycle are more elaborated to evolve into deliberative democracy, the figure below serves to build up the theoretical foundations for the research design in researching Online Deliberative Democracy exploring its impact on social, cultural, economic, political transformation for a democratic society.



  1. Bohman, J. (1998). The coming age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnemann, T. (2009). What is deliberation? By TIMin DELIBERATION, DICTIONARY. [Online 4, March, 2009]. Accessed 10 May 2015. Available at
  3. Brantmeier, E. (2009). ICT for peace and reconciliation. In C. Vrasidas, M. Zembylas, & G. Glass (Eds.), ICT for education, development and social justice (pp. 213–236). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Buchstein, H. (1997). Bytes that bite. The Internet and Deliberative Democracy, Constellations, 4(2), 248–263.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1998). Democracy and liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy) (pp. 185–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scholar
  6. Cronin, C. (2008). Between naturalism and religion by Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity. [German, 2005b].Google Scholar
  7. Dryzek, J. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, R. (2002). The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary. The Role of the Moderator in Internet Discussions about Public Issues, 7(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
  9. Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  10. Fishkin, J., & Habermas, J. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy, deliberative politics. In Estlund (Ed.), Democracy, deliberative politics (p. 33, 114–115, 120–121). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (2006, January). Broadcasts of deliberative polls: Aspirations and effects. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 184–188.Google Scholar
  12. Flew, T., & Young, G. (2005). From E-government to online deliberative democracy (pp. 1–11). Creative Industries Faculty: Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, National Forum.Google Scholar
  13. Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Gehrlein, W. (2006). Condorcet’s Paradox. Theory and Decision, 15(2), 29–35.Google Scholar
  15. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1996). Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. In addition, see his Discourse Ethics. In Moral consciousness and communicative action, translated by Lenhardt and Shier. In Between facts and norms (p. 94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hu, G., Pan, W., Lu, M., & Wang, J. (2009). The widely shared definition of e-government. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 968–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jankovic, I. (2012). Deliberative democracy: History of an idea. Theoria, Beograd, 55, 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janssen, D., & Kies, R. (2005). Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica, 40(3), 317–355.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, D. (2000). Democratic values and the internet. In D. Langford (Ed.), Internet ethics (pp. 181–200). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Mančić, Z. (2012). Deliberative democracy and the internet: Whether online deliberative democracy can replace classical democracy? Philosophy and Society, XXIII(2), 168–186.Google Scholar
  22. Murphy, C. (2010). A moral theory of political reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pavličić, P. (2010). Condorcet paradox. Philosophy and Society, XXIII(2), 278–279.Google Scholar
  24. Perera, M. (2015). Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: The role of ICT. [Online 30, June 2015]. Accessed 20 Jan 2016. Available at
  25. Sandel, M. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Selian, B. A. (2002). ICTs in support of human rights, democracy, and good governance. Geneva: International Union Telecommunication.Google Scholar
  27. Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2003). Civic innovation, conflict, and politics: Response for the good society symposium on civic innovation in America. The Good Society, 12(1), 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steiner, J. (2012). The foundations of deliberative democracy: Empirical research and normative implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Gelders, D. & Rotthier, S. (2014). e-Democracy: Exploring the current stage of e-Government. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 489.Google Scholar
  30. Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M., & Glass, G. (2009). ICT for education development and social justice. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Wisegeek. (2018). What is an internet forume. Accessed 26 Apr 2018. Available at:

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jena Center for Reconciliation StudiesFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations