Research Findings and Recommendations

  • Iyad Muhsen AlDajani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)


The figure illustrates the categories researched in this chapter:



  1. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. (1998). Democracy and Liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy (pp. 185–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative quantitative mixed-methods approach (4th ed.). California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed-Methods Research. London: SAGE. Available at Amazon [Kindle Edition].Google Scholar
  5. Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (2006). Broadcasts of Deliberative Polls: Aspirations and Effects. British Journal of Political Science, 36(January 2006), 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flybjerg, B. (2013). Mega projects and risks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (Eds.). (2012). Applied Phronesis in Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  9. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography redefined (2nd ed.). California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Pennsylvania: SAGE.Google Scholar
  12. Saldana, J. (2013a). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  13. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar

Articles in Journals & Chapters in Books

  1. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(t), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ethics Working Committee. (2012). Recommendations from the Association of Internet Research Ethics Committee. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research, 2, 19.Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, R. J. (1995). Pacific, impartial third-party intervention in international conflict: A review and an analysis. In J. A. Vasquez et al. (Eds.), Beyond confrontation: Learning conflict resolution in the post cold war era. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, R. (2001). Social – psychological processes in interactive conflict analysis and reconciliation. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence (pp. 25–45). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  5. Hollenbeck, M. E. (2001). The attainment of justice through restoration, not litigation. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence (pp. 65–85). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Kohlbacher, F. (2012). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30. From Scholar
  7. Kriesberg, L. (2001). Changing forms of coexistence. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice and coexistence (pp. 47–64). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Leiner, M. and Flämig, S. (Hg.). (2016). Latin America between Conflict and Reconciliation. Gottingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  9. Rasmussen, J. L. (2001). Toward Integrating Relationship Building and Reconciliation into Official Peace Negotiations. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence (pp. 101–127). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Saldana, J. (2013b). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  11. Sandelowski, M. (2000, August). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340.Google Scholar
  12. Weitzman, P. F., & Levkoff, S. E. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in health research with minority elders: A Lesson from a study of dementia caregiving. Fields Methods, 12(3), 195–208.Google Scholar

Internet Resources

  1. Assefa, H. (2015). Assefa Quotes, [Online on 2015]. Accessed 20 June 2016. Available at:
  2. Finizio, P. S. (2011). Online mass deliberation process, “Mass Online deliberation, how to make it happen.” Accessed 20 Aug 2013. Available at
  3. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Accessed 6 May 2015. Available at from
  4. Malcolm, X. (2005). Media’s Media’s Influence on society. Accessed 25 Dec 2015. Available at:
  5. Schulz, D. (2012). YouTube – analyzing your interviews. Accessed 4 May 2015. Available at Southampton Education School. Available at

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jena Center for Reconciliation StudiesFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations