Research Analysis, Interpretations & Evaluation

  • Iyad Muhsen AlDajani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)


The significance of this ICT research was to explore and investigate bridging a path between nations in the middle of a conflict by the influence of Internet Communication Technologies such as online social networks websites, online applications, and Facebook Pages. To adhere to communications on topics that are related to the reconciliation process as an ethical virtue to apply the process of moral practices towards reconciliation in the middle of the conflict.



  1. Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.). (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed-Methods Research. London: SAGE. Available at Amazon [Kindle Edition].Google Scholar
  4. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (Eds.). (2012). Applied Phronesis in Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  6. Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography redefined (2nd ed.). California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  7. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Pennsylvania: SAGE.Google Scholar
  8. Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saldana, J. (2013a). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  10. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  11. Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M., & Glass, G. (2009). ICT for education development and social justice. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Articles in Journals & Chapters in Books

  1. Fisher, R. (2001). Social – psychological processes in interactive conflict analysis and reconciliation. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence (pp. 25–45). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Kohlbacher, F. (2012). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30. From Scholar
  3. Leiner, M. (2018). Conclusion: From conflict resolution to reconciliation. In M. Leiner & C. Schliesser (Eds.), Alternative approaches in conflict resolution (pp. 175–183). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Moaz, I. (2004). Social cognitive mechanisms in reconciliation. In Yaacov Bar–Simon-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 225–237). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Saldana, J. (2013b). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.Google Scholar
  6. Sandelowski, M. (2000, August). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340.Google Scholar

Internet Resources

  1. Dajani, M. (2014). Wasatia NGO. Accessed 15 Jan 2016. Available at
  2. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Accessed 6 May 2015. Available at from
  3. Penna, S. E. Q. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. [Online 7 June 2013]. Accessed 20 May 2014. Available at from
  4. Schulz, D. (2012). YouTube – analyzing your interviews. Accessed 4 May 2015. Available at Southampton Education School. Available at

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jena Center for Reconciliation StudiesFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations