Abstract
In recent years, together with the development of specific software for inspection and analysis of 3D images, reverse engineering has been integrated in different kind of workflows. Among other applications, this kind of software is used to assess the accuracy of different scanners such as intraoral scanners. These scanners are used to obtain digital replicas of the dental arches and then diagnose, plan and design the customized treatment for each patient. In dentistry, these replicas are known as digital impressions. However, the accuracy of digital impressions is often called into question and there have been many research studies that measure precisely this accuracy. In these research works, reverse engineering has been widely used by using standard mesh aligning tools and measuring average deviations of aligned meshes. These measured deviations often have no correlation with the deviations that can influence the success or failure of a restoration in the mouth. A specific clinical case, such as the placement of a framework on multiple implants, requires an accurate digital impression in which the distances between implants and the angulation of the scanbodies do not exceed a certain error. This error cannot be inferred by measuring the deviation between two meshes that have been aligned using software automatic alignment tools. In this study, a procedure for measuring the accuracy of digital impressions acquired with intraoral scanners has been proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Solaberrieta, E.: Integración de la ingeniería en la odontología. Dyna 90(1), 1–4 (2015)
Chochlidakis, K.M.: Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 116(2), 184–190 (2016)
Mangano, F.: Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 17(1), 1–11 (2017)
Burhardt, L.: Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: a comparative study in young patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 150(2), 261–267 (2016)
Grünheid, T.: Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 146(5), 673–682 (2014)
Zimmermann, M.: Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 18(2), 101–129 (2015)
Patzelt, S.B.M.: The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J. Am. Dental Assoc. 145(6), 542–551 (2014)
Iturrate, M.: Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device. J. Prosthet. Dent. 121(3), 447–454 (2019)
Luhmann, T., Robson, S., Kyle, S., Boehm, J.: Close-Range Photogrammetry and 3D Imaging, 2nd edn. De Gruyter, Berlin (2013)
Richert, R.: Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J. Healthc. Eng. 2017, 1–9 (2017)
Patzelt, S.B.M.: Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin. Oral Invest. 18(6), 1687–1694 (2014)
Ender, A.: Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J. Prosth. Dent. 109(2), 121–128 (2013)
Zhang, F.: Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: an in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis. PLoS ONE 11(6), 1–10 (2016)
GOM: GOM Inspect Software (2018)
Creaform: VX elements 6.3 SR1 Software (2018)
3D Systems: Geomagic Studio Software (2013)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Faculty of Engineering Gipuzkoa for locating the DEHI (Dental Engineering – Hortz Ingeniaritza, www.ehu.eus/dehi) research group’s Laboratory in their facilities and the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU; and to the Country Council of Gipuzkoa to support this work (grant number: 70/19).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amezua-Lasuen, X., Iturrate-Mendieta, M., Oriozabala-Brit, J.A., Garikano-Osinaga, X., Martin-Amundarain, I., Solaberrieta-Mendez, E. (2020). Best-Fit Alignment in the Digital Dental Workflow. In: Cavas-Martínez, F., Sanz-Adan, F., Morer Camo, P., Lostado Lorza, R., Santamaría Peña, J. (eds) Advances in Design Engineering. INGEGRAF 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41199-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41200-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)