Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustaining Social Cohesion in Information and Knowledge Society: The Priceless Value of Privacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Core Computer Science-Based Technologies

Part of the book series: Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems ((LAIS,volume 14))

Abstract

Within Information and Knowledge Society the concept of Privacy has been enriched including aspects related to digital life, while the right to online Privacy gains more and more attention daily due to several cases of privacy breaches. Privacy is associated with the control, access and use or misuse of personal information by others, including governments, companies and other users as well. Social Network Sites as a part of digital space have altered the way that people communicate and have contributed to the construction of online social networks. During online interaction, users disclose information about them or others, while at the same time they express their concerns about Privacy infringement that may come up due to self-disclosure practices, not restricting or reversing though their disclosure behavior. Thus the “Privacy paradox” phenomenon is recorded since users cannot balance between Privacy concerns and their need for disclosure. Privacy’s circumvention destabilizes the trust between social actors, increases the feelings of insecurity and puts into risk social cohesion which is a prerequisite for the sustainability of our society. Legislation as well as technology may protect us, but sometimes they are not user friendly and sufficient. Users should protect themselves and other people in order to preserve their Privacy as a fundamental human right. In this paper, based on a literature review, we present the issue of Privacy in Social Network Sites focusing on factors that affect people’s Privacy concerns and behavior while relating these to social cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. U. Beck, Risk Society Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Chtouris, Rational Symbolic Networks—Global States and National Hobbit (Nisos Publ, Athens, 2004). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  3. L.F. Berkman, T. Glass, Social integration, social networks, social support and health, in Social Epidemiology, ed. by L.F. Berkman, I. Kawachi (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000), pp. 158–162

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Breeze, C. Grundy, A. Fletcher, Inequalities in Quality of Life Among People Aged 75 Years and Over in Great Britain (University of Sheffield, UK, 2001), https://www.growingolder.group.shef.ac.uk/GOProgSumms.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019

  5. K. Walker, A. Macbride, M.L.S. Vachon, Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement. Soc. Sci. Med. 11, 34–41 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.Y. Lin, H.P. Lu, Why people use social networking sites: an empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(3), 1152–1161 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Pai, D.C. Arnott, User adoption of social networking sites: eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 1039–1053 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Gritzalis, Enhancing web privacy and anonymity in the digital era. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 12(3), 255–288 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Mitrou, Privacy protection in information and communication technology—the legal dimension, in Privacy and Information and Communication Technologies—Technical and Legal Issues, ed. by C. Lambrinoudakis, L. Mitrou, S. Gritzalis, S. Katsikas (Papasotiriou Publ., Athens, 2010), pp. 505–551. (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Jones, T. Newburn, Private Security and Public Policing (Clarendon, Oxford, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.T. Marx, Murky conceptual waters: the public and the private. Ethics Inf. Technol. 3(3), 157–169 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Panousis, Symbolic Constructions of Reality (Entelecheia Publ, Athens, 2004). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Α. Kitsiou, The social construction of crime in Information Society: the paradigm of free software movement. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Sociology, University of the Aegean, 2014 (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kallas, Information Society and the Role of Social Sciences (Nefeli Publ, Athens, 2006). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. Cebrian, Τhe Network (Stachi, Αthens, 2000). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Mitrou, Law in Information Society (Sakkoulas Publ, Athens, 2002). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Simon, Introduction to the legal frame of information society, in Information Society, Studies on Information Society. From Theory to Political Practice, ed. by R. Pinter (Gondolat, Budapest, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.T. Lee, M.J. Noh, D.M. Koo, Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites: the mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16(6), 413–418 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E.M. Bryant, J. Marmo, A. Ramirez Jr., A functional approach to social networking sites, in Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships, ed. by K.B. Wright, L.M. Webb (Peter Lang, New York, 2011), pp. 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Kim, J.R. Lee, The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective wellbeing. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 359–364 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T.A. Pempek, Y.A. Yermolayeva, S.L. Yermolayeva, College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 30, 227–238 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Bargh, K. McKenna, The Internet and social life. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 573–590 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Pearson, All the worldwide web’s a stage: the performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday14(3) (2009), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2162/2127. Accessed Dec 2018

  24. M. Trusov, R.E. Bucklin, K. Pauwels, Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. J. Mark. 73, 90–102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (Routledge, New York, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Conger, J.H. Pratt, K.D. Loch, Personal information privacy and emerging technologies. Inf. Syst. J. 23(5), 401–417 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. Benson, G. Saridakis, H. Tennakoon, Information disclosure of social media users. Does control over personal information, user awareness and security notices matter? Inf. Technol. People28(3), 426–441 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Taddicken, The ‘privacy paradox in the social web: the impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(2), 248–273 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F. Stutzman, J. Vitak, N.B. Ellison, R. Gray, C. Lampe, Privacy in interaction: exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (AAAI org, Ireland, Dublin, 2012), pp. 330–337

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Ellison, J. Vitak, C. Steinfield, R. Gray, C. Lampe, Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 19–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Ziegele, O. Quiring, Privacy in social network sites, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 175–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. S.A. Rains, S.R. Brunner, The outcomes of broadcasting self-disclosure using new communication technologies responses to disclosure vary across one’s social network. Commun. Res. 45(5), 659–687 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N.N. Bazarova, Y.H. Choi, Self-disclosure in social media: extending the functional approach to self-disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. J. Commun. 64, 635–657 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Spiliotopoulos, I. Oakley, Understanding motivations for Facebook use: usage metrics, network structure, and privacy, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, Paris, France, 2013), pp. 3287–3296

    Google Scholar 

  35. S.C. Walton, R.E. Rice, Mediated disclosure on Twitter: the roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1465–1474 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Buschel, R. Mehdi, A. Cammilleri, Y. Marzouki, B. Elger, Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the “privacy paradox”? Sci. Eng. Ethics 20, 639–658 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Petronio, Boundary of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure (State University of New York Press, Albany, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Nguyen, Y.S. Bin, A. Campbell, Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(2), 103–111 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. D.M. Boyd, E. Hargittai, Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday15(8) (2010), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589. Accessed Jan 2019

  40. A. Acquisti, R. Gross, Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook, in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET '06), ed. by G. Danezis, P. Golle (Robinson College, Cambridge, UK, 2006), pp. 36–58

    Google Scholar 

  41. Y.M. Baek, Solving the privacy paradox: a counter-argument experimental approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 33–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. T. Dienlin, S. Trepte, Putting the social (psychology) into social media is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 45, 285–297 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sp. Kokolakis, Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: a review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comput. Secur. 64, 122–134 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. C. Cheung, Z. W. Y. Lee, T. K. H. Chan, Self-disclosure in social networking sites. Internet Res. 25(2), 279–299 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Krasnova, S. Spiekermann, K. Koroleva, T. Hildebrand, Online social networks: why we disclose. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 109–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. W.M. Klein, Z. Kunda, Exaggerated self-assessments and the preference for controllable risks. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 59, 410–427 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. L.F. Nordgren, J. Van Der Pligt, F. Van Harreveld, Unpacking perceived control in risk perception: the mediating role of anticipated regret. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 20(5), 533–544 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. L. Brandimarte, A. Acquisti, G. Loewenstein, Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(3), 340–347 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger, J.M. Grimes, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(3), 264–271 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger, D. Hansen, The impact of polices on government social media use: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(1), 30–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. E. Christofides, A. Muise, S. Desmarais, Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychol. Behav. 12(3), 341–345 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. S.B. Barnes, A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday11(9) (2006), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/1394/1312_2. Accessed Jan 2019

  53. R. Gross, A. Acquisti, Information revelation and privacy in online social networks, in Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (ACM, Virginia, USA, 2005), pp. 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  54. H.J. Smith, T. Dinev, H. Xu, Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35(4), 989–1015 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Y.M. Baek, E. Kim, Y. Bae, My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 48–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. E. Hargittai, An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 27(1), 130–137 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Y.J. Park, Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Commun. Res. 40(2), 215–236 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. B. Debatin, J.P. Lovejoy, A.K. Horn, B.N. Hughes, Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 15, 83–108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. B. Debatin, Ethics, privacy, and self-restraint in social networking, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 47–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. S. Trepte, D. Teutsch, P.K. Masur, C. Eicher, M. Fischer, A. Hennhofer, F. Lind, Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS), in Reforming European Data Protection Law, ed. by S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, P. Hert (Springer, Heidelberg, 2015), pp. 333–365

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  61. T. Zhou, Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective”. Internet Res. 21(1), 67–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. C. Posey, P.B. Lowry, T.L. Roberts, T.S. Ellis, Proposing the online community self- disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 181–195 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. C. Dwyer, S. Hiltz, K. Passerini, Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace, in Proceedings of 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007, paper 339, https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1849&context=amcis2007. Accessed Jan 2019

  64. Z. Tufekci, Facebook, youth and privacy in networked publics, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (AAAI org, Dublin, Ireland, 2012), pp. 338–35

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. Ragnedda, Social control and surveillance in the society of consumers. Int. J. Sociol. Anthropol. 3(6), 180–188 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  66. N.B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, C. Lampe, The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends’’: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. M. Taddicken, C. Jers, The uses of privacy online: trading a loss of privacy for social web gratifications?, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 143–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  68. S. Trepte, L. Reinecke, The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: a longitudinal study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 1102–1112 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. C.M.K. Cheung, P.-Y. Chiu, M.K.O. Lee, Online social networks: why do students use Facebook? Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(4), 1337–1343 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. S. Utz, N. Kramer, The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: the role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 3(2) (2009), https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4223/3265. Accessed Jan 2019

  71. D. Boyd, J. Heer, Profiles as conversation: networked identity performance on Friendster, in Proceedings of the Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39) (IEEE, Kauai, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  72. C. Steinfield, N. Ellison, C. Lampe, J. Vitak, Online social network sites and the concept of social capital, in Frontiers in New Media Research, ed. by F.L. Lee, L. Leung, J.S. Qiu, D. Chu (Routledge, New York, 2012), pp. 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  73. P.M. Valkenburg, J. Peter, The effect of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: a longitudinal study. J. Commun. 59, 79–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Z.J. Jiang, C.S. Heng, B.C. Choi, Research note-privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Syst. Res. 24(3), 579–595 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. H. Xu, X.R. Luo, J.M. Carroll, M.B. Rosson, The personalization privacy paradox: an exploratory study of decision-making process for location-aware marketing. Decis. Support Syst. 51(1), 42–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. E.E. Hollenbaugh, A.L. Ferris, Facebook self-disclosure: examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 50–58 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. N.K. Malhotra, S.S. Kim, J. Agarwal, Ιnternet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Syst. Res. 15(4), 336–355 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. M. Sideri, A. Kitsiou, C. Kalloniatis, S. Gritzalis, Privacy and Facebook universities students’ communities for confessions and secrets: the greek case, in e-Democracy 2015. CCIS, vol. 570, ed. by S.K. Katsikas, A.B. Sideridis (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  79. F. Stutzman, R. Gross, A. Acquisti, Silent listeners: the evolution of privacy and disclosure on facebook. J. Priv. Confid. 4(2), 7–41 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  80. J.L. Gibbs, N.B. Ellison, C.-H. Lai, First comes love, then comes Google: an investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Commun. Res. 38(1), 70–100 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. B.M. Okdie, Blogging and self-disclosure: the role of anonymity, self-awareness and audience size. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Psychology in the Graduate School, University of Alabama, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  82. Z. Papacharissi, P.L. Gibson, Fifteen minutes of privacy: privacy, sociality, and publicity on social network sites, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 75–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  83. P.A. Norberg, D. Horne, D. Horne, The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41(1), 100–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Z. Tufekci, Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 28, 20–36 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. T. Alashoor, M. Keil, L. Liu, H.J. Smith, How values shape concerns about privacy for self and others, in Proceedings of the Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2015, ed. by T. Carte, A. Heinzl, C. Urquhart (AIS Electronic Library, Atlanta, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  86. H. Krasnova, N.F. Veltri, O. Günther, Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: the role of culture: intercultural dynamics of privacy calculus. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(3), 127–135 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. P.B. Lowry, J. Cao, A. Everard, Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: the case of instant messaging in two cultures. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(4), 163–200 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. M. Helweg-Larsen, J.A. Shepperd, Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 5(1), 75–95 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  89. C.M. Hoadley, H. Xu, J.J. Lee, M.B. Rosson, Privacy as information access and illusory control: the case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(1), 50–60 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. A. Acquisti, L.K. John, G. Loewenstein, What is privacy worth? J. Leg. Stud. 42(2), 249–274 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. K.-L. Hui, H.-H. Teo, S.-Y.T. Lee, The value of privacy assurance: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Q. 31(1), 19–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. W.M.P. Steijn, Developing a sense of privacy: an investigation into privacy appreciation among young and older individuals in the context of social network sites. Dissertation, Tilburg University, 2014, https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/7737309/Steijn_Developing_05_09_2014_emb_tot_06_09_2015.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  93. D. Boyd, What does the Facebook experiment teach us? The Message (2014), https://medium.com/message/what-does-the-facebook-experiment-teach-us-c858c08e287f. Accessed Jan 2019

  94. S. Livingston, Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc. 10(3), 393–411 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. K. Raynes-Goldie, Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: understanding privacy in the age of Facebook’. First Monday15(1) (2010), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2775/2432. Accessed Jan 2019

  96. P.B. Brandtzæg, M. Lüders, J.H. Skjetne, Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 26, 1006–1030 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. E. Van den Broeck, K. Poels, M. Walrave, Older and wiser? Facebook use, privacy concern, and privacy protection in the life stages of emerging, young, and middle adulthood. Soc. Media Soc. 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  98. K. Sheehan, An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behavior. J. Interact. Mark. 13, 24–38 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. C. Jensen, C. Potts, C. Jensen, Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 63(1–2), 203–227 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. M.S. Ackerman, L.F. Cranor, J. Reagle, Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM, Denver, U.S.A, 1999), pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  101. K.B. Sheehan, Toward a typology of Internet users and online privacy concerns. Inf. Soc. 18, 21–32 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. M.Z. Yao, R.E. Rice, K. Wallis, Predicting user concerns about online privacy. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58, 710–722 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Y. Feng, W. Xie, Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: an analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 153–162 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. G. Cecere, F. Le Guel, N. Soulié, Perceived Internet privacy concerns on social networks in Europe. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 96, 277–287 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. D.H. Nguyen, E.D. Mynatt, Privacy Mirrors: Understanding and Shaping Socio-Technical Ubiquitous Computing Systems (Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  106. E. Kavakli, C. Kalloniatis, P. Loucopoulos, S. Gritzalis, Incorporating privacy requirements into the system design process: the PriS conceptual framework. Internet Res. 16(2), 140–158 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. C. Kalloniatis, E. Kavakli, S. Gritzalis, PriS methodology: incorporating privacy requirements into the system design process, in Proceedings of the SREIS 2005 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference—Symposium on Requirements Engineering for Information Security, ed. by J. Mylopoulos, G. Spafford (IEEE, France, Paris, 2005), pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  108. C. Kalloniatis, E. Kavakli, S. Gritzalis, Addressing privacy requirements in system design: the PriS method. Requir. Eng. J. 13(3), 241–255 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. M. Pavlidis, H. Mouratidis, C. Kalloniatis, S. Islam, S. Gritzalis, Trustworthy selection of cloud providers based in security and privacy requirements: justifying trust assumptions, in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business, ed. by S. Furnell, C. Lambrinoudakis (Springer, Czech, Prague, 2013), pp. 185–198

    Google Scholar 

  110. N.C. Kramer, N. Haferkamp, Online self-presentation: balancing privacy concerns and impression construction on social networking sites, in Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social web, ed. by S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 127–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  111. E. Litt, Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1649–1656 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. A.L. Young, A. Quan-Haase, Privacy protection strategies on Facebook. Information. Commun. Soc. 16(4), 479–500 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. M. Johnson, S. Egelman, S.M. Bellovin, Facebook and privacy: it’s complicated, in Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2012) (ACM, Washington, 2012), pp. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  114. E. Vanderhoven, T. Schellens, M. Valcke, Exploring the usefulness of school education about risks on social network sites: a survey study. J. Media Liter. Educ. 5(1), 285–294 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  115. E. Vanderhoven, T. Schellens, M. Valcke, Educating teens about the risks on social network sites: an intervention study in secondary education. Communicar Sci. J. Media Educ. 43(XXII), 123–131 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  116. E. Vanderhoven, T. Schellens, R. Vanderlinde, M. Valcke, Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: a design-based research approach. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 64, 459–480 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. R. Del Rey, J.A. Casas, R. Ortega, The ConRed program, an evidence-based practice. Communicar Sci. J. Media Educ. 39(XX), 129–137 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  118. M. Sideri, A. Kitsiou, E. Tzortzaki, C. Kalloniatis, S. Gritzalis, “I have learned that I must think twice before…”. An educational intervention for enhancing students’ privacy awareness in Facebook, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, E-Democracy 2017, ed. by S. Katsikas, V. Zorkadis (Springer, Cham, 2017), pp. 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  119. M. Foucault, Power, Knowledge Ethics (Ipsilon, Athens, 1987). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  120. T.H. Eriksen, Tyranny of the Moment Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age (. Pluto Press, London, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  121. Μ. Jakala, E. Berki, Communities, communication and online identities, in Digital Identity and Social Media, ed. by St. Warburton, St. Hatzipanagos (IGI Global, USA, 2013), pp. 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  122. E. Lampropoulou, Internal Security and Control Society (Kritiki Publ, Athens, 2001). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  123. C. Norris, From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control, in Surveillance and Social Sorting: Privacy Risk and Automated Discrimination, ed. by D. Lyon (Routledge, London, 2003), pp. 249–281

    Google Scholar 

  124. D. Lyon, The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society-Computers and Social Control in Context (Wiley, UK, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  125. M. Kandias, L. Mitrou, V. Stavrou, D. Gritzalis, Which side are you on? A new panopticon versus privacy, in Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT) (IEEE, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2013), pp. 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  126. L. Mitrou, M. Kandias, V. Stavrou, D. Gritzalis, Social media profiling: a panopticon or omniopticon tool? in Proceedings of the 6th Biannual Surveillance and Society Conference (Spain, Barcelona, 2014), pp. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  127. A. Melucci, Social Theory in the Information Era (Trotta Editorial, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  128. E. Daskalakis, Criminology of Social Reaction: Traditions (Sakkoulas Publ, Athens, 1985). (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  129. F.B. Viégas, Blogger’s expectations of privacy and accountability: an initial survey. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 10(3), 1–31 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  130. G. D’Souza, J.E. Phelps, The privacy Paradox: the case of secondary disclosure. Rev. Mark. Sci. 7, 1–29 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  131. D.J. Solove, A taxonomy of privacy. Law Rev. 154(3), 477–560 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  132. M.B. Islam, J. Watson, R. Iannella, S. Geva, What I Want for my Social Network Privacy (NICTA, Australia, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  133. A. Beldad, M. De Jong, M. Steehouder, I trust not therefore it must be risky: determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(6), 2233–2242 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. J. Midgley, Social Development The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare (Sage, London, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  135. J. Holmberg (ed.), Making Development Sustainable (Island Press, Washington D.C., 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  136. W. Streeck, Productive constraints: on the institutional conditions of diversified quality production, in Social Institutions and Economic Performance, ed. by W. Street (Sage, London, 1992), pp. 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  137. P. Cooke, K. Morgan, The Associational Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  138. N. Uphoff, Local Institutional Development: An Analytic Sourcebook with Cases (Kumarian, West Hartford, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  139. L.F. Salmen, Listen to the People Participant-Observer Evaluation of Development Projects (Oxford University Press, Washington, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  140. S.E. Henderson, Expectations of privacy in social media. Mississippi Coll. Law Rev. 31, 227–324 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  141. J.E. Cohen, What privacy is for. Harvard Law Rev. 126(7), 1904–1933 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Systems Security, Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, 18532, Piraeus, GR, Greece

    Stefanos Gritzalis

  2. Privacy Engineering and Social Informatics Laboratory, Department of Cultural Technology and Communication, University of the Aegean, 81100, Lesvos, GR, Greece

    Maria Sideri, Angeliki Kitsiou & Christos Kalloniatis

  3. Laboratory of Information and Communication Systems Security, Department of Information and Communications Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200, Samos, GR, Greece

    Eleni Tzortzaki

Authors
  1. Stefanos Gritzalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Sideri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angeliki Kitsiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eleni Tzortzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christos Kalloniatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanos Gritzalis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece

    George A. Tsihrintzis

  2. Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece

    Maria Virvou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gritzalis, S., Sideri, M., Kitsiou, A., Tzortzaki, E., Kalloniatis, C. (2021). Sustaining Social Cohesion in Information and Knowledge Society: The Priceless Value of Privacy. In: Tsihrintzis, G., Virvou, M. (eds) Advances in Core Computer Science-Based Technologies. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41196-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41196-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41195-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41196-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation