Skip to main content

Mapping Machine-Generated Questions to Their Related Paragraphs in the Textbook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence Supported Educational Technologies

Part of the book series: Advances in Analytics for Learning and Teaching ((AALT))

  • 874 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, question generation techniques were briefly reviewed, and a question-paragraph mapping task was identified. Then, we described our method to solve the mapping task and the preliminary results. In specific, given a set of questions generated from a semantic network and a list of paragraphs, the mapping task was to map the related paragraphs to each question. To conduct a first step evaluation, two undergraduate students were recruited to make connections between 53 paragraphs and 54 questions. The two students first submitted their works separately and discuss to resolve their conflicts together. The mutual agreement work was treated as the gold standards. By comparing the machine-generated mapping to the human-generated mapping, it showed that the machine-generated mapping (F measure: 0.68) performed as good as human-generated ones (F measure: 0.67/0.66). It implied that the mapping technique could be potentially used to give students the recommendation for further learning materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, H., Chali, Y., & Hasan, S. A. (2010). Automation of question generation from sentences. Paper presented at the Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 89–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral, C., Vo, N. H., & Liang, S. (2012). Answering why and how questions with respect to a frame-based knowledge base: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the ICLP (Technical Communications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Cong, G., Cui, B., Jensen, C. S., & Zhang, C. (2009). The use of categorization information in language models for question retrieval. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curto, S., Mendes, A. C., & Coheur, L. (2012). Question generation based on Lexico-Syntactic patterns learned from the Web. Dialogue & Discourse, 3(2), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Shao, J., & Cardie, C. (2017). Learning to ask: Neural question generation for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, A., Zettlemoyer, L. S., & Etzioni, O. (2013). Paraphrase-driven learning for open question answering. Paper presented at the ACL (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci, D., Brown, E., Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D., Kalyanpur, A. A., et al. (2010). Building Watson: An overview of the DeepQA project. AI Magazine, 31(3), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., & Nie, J.-Y. (2012). Towards concept-based translation models using search logs for query expansion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., et al. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olney, A., Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. (2012). Question generation from concept maps. Dialogue and Discourse, 3(2), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puente, C., Sobrino, A., & Olivas, J. A. (2009). Extraction of conditional and causal sentences from queries to provide a flexible answer. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. E., Walker, S., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (2000). Experimentation as a way of life: okapi at trec. Information Processing & Management, 36(1), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–5223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, X., Jeon, J., & Croft, W. B. (2008). Retrieval models for question and answer archives. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & VanLehn, K. (2016). How do machine-generated questions compare to human-generated questions? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & VanLehn, K. (2017). Adaptively selecting biology questions generated from a semantic network. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 828–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & VanLehn, K. (2019). Evaluation of auto-generated distractors in multiple choice questions from a semantic network. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619586

  • Zhang, X., Lapata, M., Wei, F., & Zhou, M. (2018). Neural latent extractive document summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Yang, N., Wei, F., Tan, C., Bao, H., & Zhou, M. (2017, November). Neural question generation from text: A preliminary study. In National CCF Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (pp. 662–671). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 61807004].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lishan Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, L. (2020). Mapping Machine-Generated Questions to Their Related Paragraphs in the Textbook. In: Pinkwart, N., Liu, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Supported Educational Technologies. Advances in Analytics for Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41099-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41099-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41098-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41099-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics