Skip to main content

Globalization, Intersectional Inequalities and Narrative Struggles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Resistance and Transnational Memories of Violent Conflicts

Part of the book series: Memory Politics and Transitional Justice ((MPTJ))

Abstract

The research fields of transitional justice and memory politics are useful if we want to solve the political puzzle of why the silences and denials that relate to the memories of violent conflicts in Indonesia continue, despite an increased acceptance of global norms on transitional justice. In this chapter, I explain how innovative transnational and gender perspectives can address the limitations resulting from assumptions about power relations and globalization in these research fields. In this study, I combine approaches to the study of gender and globalization with theories on resistance, including how denial and resistance relate to the political dynamics of emotions and emotional agency after trauma. I end by developing my approach to the analysis of personal, strategic and social narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2008). Doing narrative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing feminism: Gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15(Winter), 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., Yuval-Davis, N., & Cain, H. (1992). Racialized boundaries: Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (2014). Transnational memories. European Review, 22(4), 546–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A., & Conrad, S. (Eds.). (2010). Memory in a global Age: Discourses, practices and trajectories. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (1997). Un-civil society: The politics of the ‘informal people’. Third World Quarterly, 18, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., & O’Rourke, C. (2007). Does feminism need a theory of transitional justice? An introductory essay. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2015). Through the looking glass: Transitional justice futures through the lens of nationalism, feminism and transformative change. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 9(1), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Zistel, S., Koloma Beck, T., Braun, C., & Mieth, F. (Eds.). (2014). Transitional justice theories. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.-D., & Qvotrup Jensen, S. (2014). Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Husain, E. (2008). States of denial and the secular state. RSA Journal, 154(5534), 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2016). Masculinities in global perspectives. Theory and Society, 45(4), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1992). Introduction: Maurice Halbwachs 1877–1945. In M. Halbwachs (Ed.), On collective memory: Edited, translated and with an introduction by Lewis A. Coser (pp. 1–34). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craps, S. (2013). Postcolonial witnessing: Trauma out of bounds. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(article 8), 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauphinee, E. (2013). The politics of exile. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Almagro Iniesta, M. M. (2015). Negotiated contestation in peacebuilding: Maintaining or transforming systemic narratives? Critical Studies on Security, 3(3), 326–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cesari, C. & Rigney, A. (Eds.). (2014). Transnational memory: Circulation, articulation, scales. Media and Cultural Memory Series. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Greiff, P. (2012). Theorizing transitional justice. In M. S. Williams, R. Nagy, & J. Elster (Eds.), Transitional justice: Nomos Li (pp. 31–77). New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, S. I. (2011). Transitional justice beyond the normative: Towards a literary theory of political transitions. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(2), 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edkins, J. (2003). Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erll, A. (2011). Travelling memory. Parallax, 17(4), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, R. (2016). Social movements and memory. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 79–83). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1998). Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Y., Brown, A., & Sodaro, A. (Eds.). (2010). Memory and the future: Transnational politics, ethics, and society. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory: Edited, translated and with an introduction by Lewis A. Coser. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, A.-M. (2016). ‘We are named by others and we are named by ourselves’: Social constructivism and intersectionality-like thinking. In A.-M. Hancock (Ed.), Intersectionality: An intellectual history (pp. 1–33). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, M. (2013). Sex, gender and sexuality. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 31–56). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J., Blagojević, M., & Harrison, K. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, P. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, A. (Ed.). (2010). Transitional justice: Global mechanisms and local realities after genocide and mass violence. New York, NY: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, S. (1994). Memory and testimony in women survivors of Nazi genocide. In J. Baskin (Ed.), Women of the word: Jewish women and jewish writing (pp. 258–282). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, S. (1997). Voicing the void: Muteness and memory in Holocaust fiction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. (2016). Affective communities in world politics: Collective emotions after trauma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. (2019). Emotions, bodies, and the un/making of international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 47(2), 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, D. (2016). Globalization and/of memory: On the complexification and contestation of memory cultures and practices. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 143–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (2010). Memorializing the Holocaust: Gender, genocide and collective memory. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassem, F. (2011). Palestinian women: Narrative histories and gendered memories. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics (pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, L. (2012). The dynamics of transitional justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, S. (2009). Globalization and postcolonialism: Hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2002). Memory unbound: The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, M., Baaz, M., Schulz, M., & Vinthagen, S. (2017). How resistance encourages resistance: Theorizing the nexus between power, ‘Organised Resistance’ and ‘Everyday Resistance’. Journal of Political Power, 10(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K., & McGregor, L. (Eds.). (2008). Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change. Oxford, UK and Portland, OR: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihr, A. (2017). An introduction to transitional justice. In O. Simic (Ed.), An introduction to transitional justice (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (Eds.). (2017). Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2002). ‘Under Western eyes’ revisited. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, K., & Lahai, J. I. (2018). Gender in human rights and transitional justice. In J. I. Lahai & K. Moyo (Eds.), Gender in human rights and transitional justice: Crossing boundaries of gender and politics in the global South (pp. 1–15). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, R. (2008). Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly, 29(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ní Aoláin, F. (2012). Advancing feminist positioning in the field of transitional justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6(2), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (2016). Sites of memory studies [Lieux des études des mémoire]. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 41–52). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, W. (2008). Narratives of events: Labovian narrative analysis and its limitations. In M. Andrews, C. Squire, & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Doing narrative research (pp. 22–40). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedwell, C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radstone, S. (2002). The war of the fathers: Trauma, fantasy, and September 11. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(1), 457–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radstone, S. (2011). What place is this? Transcultural memory and the locations of memory studies. Parallax, 17(4), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading, A. (2014). Making memory work for feminist theory. In M. Evans, C. Hemmings, M. Henry, H. Johnstone, S. Madhok, A. Plomien, & S. Wearing (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of feminist theory (pp. 196–214). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, A. G. (2017). Measuring the success (or failure) of transitional justice. In O. Simic (Ed.), An introduction to transitional justice (pp. 269–288). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1980). Narrative time. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative [Temps et Recít] (Vol. 1, K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, A. (2016). Cultural memory studies: Mediation, narrative and the aesthetic. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 65–76). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, A. (2018). Remembering hope: Transnational activism beyond the traumatic. Memory Studies, 11(3), 368–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, M. (2014). Afterword: Locating transnational memory. European Review, 22(4), 652–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2016). Rethinking the concept of collective memory. In A. L. Tota & T. Haven (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 9–21). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1989). Everyday forms of resistance. Copenhagen Papers, 4, 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., & Waldorf, L., with Hazan, P. (Eds.). (2010). Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, S. R. (2015). Analyzing social narratives. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, L. J. (2011). Sex, security and superhero(in)es: From 1325 to 1820 and beyond. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(4), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierp, A., & Wüstenberg, J. (2015). Linking the local and the transnational: Rethinking memory politics in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23(3), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simic, O. (Ed.). (2017). An introduction to transitional justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, C. S. (2008). The comfort women: Sexual violence and post-colonial memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago, IL and London, UK: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, C. (2008). Experience-centred and culturally-oriented approaches to narrative. In M. Andrews, C. Squire, & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Doing narrative research (pp. 41–63). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, P. (2016). Postkoloniale narrativer [Postcolonial narratives]. In I. Glavind Bo, A.-D. Christensen, & T. Lund Thomsen (Eds.), Narrativ forskning – tilgange og metoder [Narrative research—Approaches and methods] (pp. 293–312]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, P. (2019). Masculinities, postcolonialism and transnational memories of violent conflicts. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 14(3), 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. G. (2003). Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. G. (2014). Globalizing transitional justice: Contemporary essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tota, A. L., & Hagen, T. (2016). Introduction. Memory work: Naming pasts, transforming futures. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of memory studies (pp. 1–6). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibben, A. T. R. (2011). Feminist security studies: A narrative approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibben, A. T. R. (2016). Introduction: Feminists study war. In A. T. R. Wibben (Ed.), Researching war: Feminist methods, ethics & politics (pp. 1–9). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. (2016). Translating international women’s rights: The CEDAW convention in context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. (2017). Women’s rights norms as content-in-motion and incomplete practice. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(5), 675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Novels

  • Birney, A. (2016). De tolk van Java [The interpreter from Java]. Amsterdam: De Geus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudori, L. (2012). Pulang. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudori, L. (2015). Home (Indonesian original, Pulang, 2012). Dallas, TX: Deep Vellum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangunwijaya, Y. B. (1991). Durga/Umayi. Jakarta: Grafiti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangunwijaya, Y. B. (2004). Durga/Umayi (Indonesian original, Durga/Umayi, 1991). Seattle: University of Washington Press in association with Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dis, A. (1994). Indische duinen [Indisch dunes]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline Stoltz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoltz, P. (2020). Globalization, Intersectional Inequalities and Narrative Struggles. In: Gender, Resistance and Transnational Memories of Violent Conflicts. Memory Politics and Transitional Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41095-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics