Skip to main content

Stagnation Theories: Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Secular Stagnation Theories

Part of the book series: Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought ((SSHET))

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

Providing an interim conclusion, this chapter stresses that demand- and supply-side stagnation theories are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but may complement each other. Moreover, it is emphasized that most stagnation hypotheses that emerged during the two major waves of secular stagnation theories in the mid-twentieth century and after the financial crisis of 2008–2009 refer to time periods of high and/or rising income inequality. The chapter thus paves the way for the following chapters, which focus on the impact of changes in income disparities on possible secular stagnation tendencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While the Great Depression was the ultimate trigger for the development of various secular stagnation theories in modern history, there had been some (vague) allusions and approaches before 1929. As has been outlined in Sect. 3.2.1, (Schumpeter 1954, p. 1172), for instance, traced Keynes’s ([1919] 1971) stagnationist thoughts back to his book The Economic Consequences of the Peace, first published in 1919. Yet, Keynes clearly advanced his approach in later years, particularly in the 1930s and thereafter.

References

  • Bleaney MF (1976) Underconsumption theories: a history and critical analysis. International Publishers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2014) The turtle’s progress: secular stagnation meets the headwinds. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. CEPR Press, London, pp 47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AH (1955) The stagnation thesis. In: Smithies A, Butters JK (eds) Readings in fiscal policy. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, pp 540–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins B (1946) The doctrine of economic maturity. Am Econ Rev 36(1):133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki M, ([1968] 1971) Trend and the business cycle. In: Kalecki M (ed) Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 165–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM ([1919] 1971) The economic consequences of the peace. In: The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol II: the economic consequences of the peace. Macmillan St. Martin’s Press for the Royal Economiy Society, London and Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent W (2002) Welcome to the journal of the Gilded Age and progressive era. J Gilded Age Progres Era 1(1):7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) High uncertainty weighing on global growth. Interim economic assessment, 20 September 2018. OECD, Paris. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/. Accessed 23 Nov 2018

  • Schumpeter JA (1954) History of economic analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindl J ([1952] 1976) Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism (with a new introduction by the author). Monthly Review Press, New York, NY, and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindl J ([1966] 1984) On maturity in capitalist economies. In: Foster JB, Szlajfer H (eds) The faltering economy: the problem of accumulation under monopoly capitalism. Monthly Review Press, New York, NY, pp 167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindl J ([1989] 1990) From stagnation in the 30s to slow growth in the 70s. In: Steindl J (ed) Economic papers 1941–88, St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY, pp 166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy PM, Magdoff H (1977) Economic history as it happened, vol III. The deepening crisis of U.S. capitalism. Monthly Review Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy PM, Magdoff H (1987) Economic history as it happened, vol IV. Stagnation and the financial explosion. Monthly Review Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy PM, Magdoff H (1988) Economic history as it happened, vol V. The irreversible crisis. Monthly Review Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Anselmann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anselmann, C. (2020). Stagnation Theories: Concluding Remarks. In: Secular Stagnation Theories. Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41087-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics