Dostoevsky as a Romantic Novelist



Dostoevsky is often regarded as the ultimate heir to both European and Russian Romanticisms, and the genre of the polyphonic novel that he created—as a quintessential expression of literary and philosophical modernism. This chapter argues that in order to fully understand Dostoevsky’s breakthrough one ought to examine his work in the context of both German and Russian aesthetic debates in the 1800s–60s. The crucial role in all these discussions belonged to Friedrich Schiller, whom Dostoevsky on one occasion called “a Russian poet,” whose works “have become flesh and blood of Russian culture.” Schiller’s poetry and dramas offered a lifelong source of poetic inspiration to Dostoevsky. He also knew Schiller’s Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man (1795) and On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry (1795–96), and tried to apply them in his novelistic experimentations. Focusing in particular on The Brothers Karamazov, this chapter argues that Dostoevsky’s attempt to cast Alyosha as an embodiment of the Schillerian “beautiful soul” capable of reconciling his brothers remains unconvincing. Although in the epilogue Alyosha acts like a teacher in front of a crowd of schoolboys, his Bildung remains incomplete. The denouement of Dmitry’s and Ivan’s stories is likewise deferred. But while this work, which lacks unity of action, resists canonical aesthetic interpretations, it invites Friedrich Schlegel’s approach to the novel as a pluralistic, essentially open genre system, which integrates ancient and modern, “naïve” and “sentimental” literary forms.

Works Cited

  1. Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by Mikhail Bakhtin. Edited by Michael Holquist and translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Edited and translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Edited by Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov and translated by Vadim Liapunov. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Beiser, Frederick. Schiller as a Philosopher: A Reexamination. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belinsky, V.G. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v trinadtsati tomakh. Moscow: Akademiianauk, 1953–1959.Google Scholar
  6. Berlin, Isaiah. Russian Thinkers. London: Penguin Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, Anna. “The Idiot’s Romantic Struggle.” Dostoevsky Studies, New Series XII (2008), 81–103.Google Scholar
  8. Bird, Robert. The Russian Prospero: The Creative Universe of Viacheslav Ivanov. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Chernyshevsky, M.N. (ed.). Ocherki gogolevskogo perioda russkoi literatury. St. Petersburg: tipografiia Tikhanova, 1892.Google Scholar
  10. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v tridsati tomakh. Edited by V.G. Bazanov et al. 30 vols. Leningrad: Nauka, 1972–1990.Google Scholar
  11. ———. The Brothers Karamazov. Edited by Ralph E. Matlaw and translated by Constance Garnett. A Norton Critical Edition. New York and London: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. ———. The Adolescent. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Knopf, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. ———. The Dream of a Ridiculous Man. Translated by Constance Garnett. London: Adelphi, 2018.Google Scholar
  14. Fanger, Donald. Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, Joseph. Dostoevsky: The Seeds of Revolt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. ———. Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. ———. Dostoevsky: The Miraculous Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. Golovchenko, F.M. Belinsky v vospominaniiakh sovremennikov. Moscow: OGIY, 1948.Google Scholar
  19. Grigor’ev, Apollon. Sobranie sochinenii. Edited by V.F. Savodnik. Moscow: Kushner, 1915.Google Scholar
  20. ———. Sochinenia v dvukh tomakh. Edited by V.F. Egorov. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. ———. Apologia pochvennichstva. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Herzog, Liza. (ed.). Hegel’s Thought in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Holland, Kate. The Novel in the Age of Disintegration: Dostoevsky and the Problem of Genre in the 1870s. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  24. Holquist, Michael and Katerina Clark. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. Hufen, Christian. Fedor Stepun. Ein politischer Intellektueller aus Russland in Europa. Die Jahre 1884–1945. Berlin: Lukas Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Ivanov, Viacheslav. Freedom and the Tragic Life. Edited and translated by Robert L. Jackson. New York: Noonday, 1952.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, Robert Louis. Dostoevsky’s Quest for Form: A Study of his Philosophy of Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, Malcolm V. “Dostoevsky and an Aspect of Schiller’s Psychology.” The Slavonic and East European Review 52, no. 128 (1974), 337–54.Google Scholar
  29. Kliger, Ilya. “Dostoevsky and the Novel-Tragedy: Genre and Modernity in Ivanov, Pumpyansky, and Bakhtin.” PMLA 126, no. 1 (2011), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukács, Georg. Goethe and his Age. Translated by Robert Anchor. London: Merlin Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  31. ———. The Theory of the Novel. Translated by Anna Bostock. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  32. ———. Studies in European Realism. New York: Howard Fertig, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Lyngstad, Alexandra. Dostoevsky and Schiller. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McReynolds, Susan. “Dostoevsky and Schiller: National Renewal Through Aesthetic Education.” Philosophy and Literature 28, no. 2 (2004), 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merezhkovsky, Dmitrii. L. Tolstoy i Dostoevsky. Vechnye sputniki. Moscow: Respublika, 1995.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, Robin Feuer. The Brothers Karamazov: Worlds of the Novel. New York: Twayne, 1992.Google Scholar
  37. Mirsky, D.S. (Sviatopolk-Mirsky, Prince). A History of Russian Literature from the Earliest Times to the Death of Dostoevsky (1881). New York: Knopf, 1927.Google Scholar
  38. Mochulsky, Konstantin. Dostoevsky: His Life and Work. Translated by Michael A. Minihan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  39. Müller-Seidel, Walter. Friedrich Schiller und die Politik. München: C.H. Beck, 2009.Google Scholar
  40. Nassar, Dalia. The Romantic Absolute: Being and Knowing in Early Romantic German Philosophy, 1795–1804. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  41. Perlina, Nina. Varieties of Poetic Utterance: Quotation in the Brothers Karamazov. Lanham, NY and London: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
  42. Safranski, Rüdiger. Schiller oder die Erfindung des Deutschen Idealismus. München: Fischer Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
  43. Schiller, Friedrich. Gedichte. Stuttgart: Cotta’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1879.Google Scholar
  44. ———. “Über naïve und sentimentalische Dichtung.” In Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe, edited by Benno von Wiese, vol. 20, Pt. 1, 413–503. Weimar: Hermann Böhlhaus Nachfolger, 1962.Google Scholar
  45. ———. Die Raüber. Mit einem Nachwort, Anmerkungen und bibliographischen Hinweisen von Hiltrud Haentzschel. München: Goldmann Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar
  46. ———. On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Edited and translated by Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and L.A. Willoughby. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  47. ———. “Wilhelm Tell.” In Klassische Dramen, edited by Matthias Luserke-Jaqui, 385–506. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
  48. Schlegel, Friedrich. Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Edited by E. Behler, J.J. Anstett, and H. Eichner. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1958ff. (Abbreviated as: KFSA.)Google Scholar
  49. ———. “Gespräch über die Poesie.” In KFSA, vol. 2, 1967.Google Scholar
  50. Steiner, George. Tolstoy or Dostoevsky: An Essay in the Old Criticism. New York: Knopf, 1959.Google Scholar
  51. Steiner, Lina. For Humanity’s Sake: The Bildungsroman in Russian Culture. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. “The Bildungsroman in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union.” In A Cambridge History of the Bildungsroman, edited by Sarah Young, 84–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stepun, Fyodor. Tragediia tvorchstva (Friedrich Schlegel). (Tragoedie des Gestaltens. F. Schlegel.) Logos 1 (1910), 171–96.Google Scholar
  54. Strakhov, N.N. Bor’ba s Zapadom v nashei literature. 3 vols. Kiev: tipografia Khokhlova, 1897.Google Scholar
  55. Tihanov, Galin. The Master and the Slave: Lukács, Bakhtin, and the Ideas of Their Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Todorov, Tzvetan. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Translated by Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  57. Tschiewskij, Dmitry. “Schiller und die Brüder Karamasow.” Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie IV (1929), 1–42. English translation: “Schiller and the Brothers Karamaozov.” In The Brothers Karamazov, translated by Constance Garnett and edited by Ralph E. Matlaw, 794–807. A Norton Critical Edition. New York and London: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
  58. Tunimanov, V.A. Tvorchestvo Dostoevskogo, 1854–1862. Leningrad: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  59. Volgin, Igor’. Poslednii god Dostoevskogo: istoricheskie zapiski. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1986.Google Scholar
  60. Walicki, Andrzej. A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism. Translated by Hilda Andrews-Rusiecka. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  61. Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bonn UniversityBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations