Shandeanism, the Imagination, and Mysticism: Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria



Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria (1817) is an iconic work in the history of English Literature, which uniquely draws on contemporary German thought. Coleridge attempts to replace arbitrary critical judgements with principles based on a philosophical argument about human psychology. This chapter first explores Coleridge’s digressive, “Shandean” method and then traces his rejection of associationism. Coleridge replaces the latter, empiricist theory with an idealist conception of the “imagination.” The chapter considers both how Coleridge’s fragmentary definition of the imagination responds to the rival account of William Wordsworth, and its affinity with the approach of “mystics” such as Jacob Böhme to whom Coleridge professes a spiritual and intellectual debt.

Works Cited

  1. Ashton, Rosemary. The German Idea: Four English Writers and the Reception of German Thought 1800–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, John. Coleridge’s Play of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Class, Monika. Coleridge and Kantian Ideas in England, 1796–1817. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Coleridge, S.T. Biographia Literaria. Edited by James Engell and W. Jackson Bate. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. ———. The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. General editor Kathleen Coburn. 16 vols in 34. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957–2002.Google Scholar
  6. von Eschenmayer, C.A. Versuch die scheinbare Magie des thierischen Magnetismus aus physiologischen und psychischen Gesetzen zu erklären. Stuttgart and Tübingen: die J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung, 1816.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, George. The Journal of George Fox. Edited by John L. Nickalls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  8. Fulford, Tim. “Science and Poetry in 1790s Somerset: The Self-Experiment Narrative, the Aeriform Effusion, and the Greater Romantic Lyric.” ELH 85, no. 1 (Spring 2018), 85–117.Google Scholar
  9. Goethe, J.W. Gedenkausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche. Edited by Ernst Beutler. 24 vols. Zürich: Artemis-Verlag, 1948–1960.Google Scholar
  10. Halmi, Nicholas. “Coleridge’s Ecumenical Spinoza.” In Coleridge and his Circle: New Perspectives, special issue of Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net, 61 (2012). [accessed 6/3/2020].
  11. Haven, Richard. “Coleridge, Hartley, and the Mystics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 20 (1959), 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe, Anthony. “Poetic Defences and Manifestos.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Romanticism, edited by David Duff, 264–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  13. McFarland, Thomas. Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. ———. “The Origin and Significance of Coleridge’s Theory of Secondary Imagination.” In New Perspectives on Coleridge and Wordsworth, edited by Geoffrey Hartman, 195–246. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Modiano, Raimonda. “Coleridge and Milton: The Case Against Wordsworth in the Biographia Literaria.” In Biographia Literaria: Text and Meaning, edited by Frederick Burwick, 150–70. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. ———. “Coleridge as Literary Critic: Biographia Literaria and Essays on the Principles of Genial Criticism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, edited by Frederick Burwick, 204–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Møller, Lis. Erindringens poetik: William Wordsworth, S. T. Coleridge, Thomas De Quincey. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Muratori, Cecilia. The First German Philosopher: The Mysticism of Jakob Böhme as Interpreted by Hegel. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prickett, Stephen. Coleridge and Wordsworth: The Poetry of Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Reid, Nicholas. Coleridge, Form and Symbol; or, the Ascertaining Vision. Farnham: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
  21. Schlegel, Friedrich. “Athenäumsfragmente.” In Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, edited by Ernst Behler et al., vol. 2, 165–256. Munich, Paderborn, Wien, and Zürich: Schöningh, 1967.Google Scholar
  22. Vigus, James. Platonic Coleridge. Oxford: Legenda, 2009.Google Scholar
  23. ———. “Informal Religion: Lakers on Quakers.” In Informal Romanticism, edited by James Vigus, 97–114. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2012.Google Scholar
  24. ———. “The Philosophy of Samuel Taylor Coleridge.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, edited by William Mander, 520–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, Catherine Miles. The Design of Biographia Literaria. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
  26. Wheeler, Kathleen M. Sources, Processes and Methods in Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Whiteley, Giles. Schelling’s Reception in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations