Skip to main content

The Fast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses a threefold chase: a vicious cycle of chasing funding, chasing programmers, and chasing papers. Project-based subsidies engender a precarious position because one is dependent on financial support that is temporary and conditional. There is a manifold sense of uncertainty when applying for funding. The search for funding, and thus work opportunities, is accompanied by maintaining a network of professional contacts. A career in contemporary dance develops between institutions, which demand certain competences in order to sustain itself. The persistent chase after programmers requires networking skills and self-promotion abilities. The social dynamics at play prove to be fundamental in advancing contemporary dance artists’ careers. The third kind of chase deals with the bureaucracy that comes hand in hand with autonomous work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The overview of Koruga’s work in relation to the artistic production process is recapitulated in an article published in the European Journal of Theatre and Performance available online: https://journal.eastap.com (Van Assche 2020).

  2. 2.

    The observations here are based on a performance in Weld, Stockholm, in December 2013.

  3. 3.

    Yet it should be kept in mind that even though grants are generally tax-free, they often do not count for calculating one’s pension.

  4. 4.

    However, it should be noted that this difference in income is also related to the fact that due to the strict requirements to obstain the status, artists benefiting from it are generally older and their salaries have grown according to the seniority wage scales.

  5. 5.

    However, it merits mention that upon publishing this book, a change seems to be happening in Flanders: in November 2019, cultural policymakers recommended to curtail project-based subsidies in the arts sector with 60% for 2020, whereas the longer-term subsidies would be reduced for merely 6%.

  6. 6.

    Own translation from Dutch.

  7. 7.

    It is not mandatory to follow these in French Community of Belgium.

  8. 8.

    The fee has been reconsidered in 2017 to respectively 2300 and 2660 euros per month.

  9. 9.

    I will elaborate on the legality of how some artists handle their tax returns further in this chapter.

References

  • Abbing, Hans. 2008. Why Are Artists Poor: The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auer, Peter. 2010. What’s in a Name? The Rise (and Fall?) of Flexicurity. Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (3): 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna, Sergio. 2006. Die Zerstörung Der Mittelschichten: Thesen Zur Neuen Selbständigkeit. Graz: Nausner & Nausner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. John Grissen Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. In The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, ed. Pierre Bourdieu and Randal Johnson, 74–111. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ramsay. 2016. Ungoverning Dance: Contemporary European Theatre Dance and the Commons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currid, Elizabeth. 2007. The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, Pascal. 2003. Kunst in Netwerken: Artistieke Selecties in De Hedendaagse Dans En De Beeldende Kunst. Tielt: Lannoo Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Art Scene: A Clever Working Model for Economic Exploitation?. In A Precarious Existence—Vulnerability in the Public Domain, ed. Jorinde Seijdel et al., Open, 8–16. Rotterdam: Nai Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesters, Delphine. 2004. De Choreografie Van De Danscarrière: Kwalitatief Onderzoek Naar De Carrières Van Hedendaagse Dansers in Vlaams-Brusselse Context. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, Joris, and Simon Leenknegt. 2017. Tussen Pot En Put. De Evolutie Van Projectsubsidies En Beurzen Via Het Kunstendecreet (2009–2016). Brussels: Flanders Arts Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Winchester: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laermans, Rudi. 2015. Moving Together: Making and Theorizing Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Pierre-Michel. 2014. The Economics of Creativity: Art and Achievement Under Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Njaradi, Dunja. 2014. Backstage Economies: Labour and Masculinities in Contemporary European Dance. Chester: University of Chester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Tom. 1997. The Brand Called You. Fast Company 10 (10): 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pewny, Katharina. 2011. Das Drama Des Prekären: Über Die Wiederkehr Der Ethik in Theater Und Performance. Theater. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poláček, Richard. 2007. Study on Impediments to Mobility in the EU Live Performance Sector and on Possible Solutions. Brussels: PEARLE, Finnish Theater Information Centre, IETM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambach, Anne, and Marine Rambach. 2001. Les Intellos Précaires. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout, Nicholas, and Rebecca Schneider. 2012. Precarity and Performance: An Introduction. TDR/the Drama Review 56 (4): 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Hartmut. 2003. Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society. Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 10 (1): 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorignet, Pierre-Emmanuel. 2010. Danser. Enquête Dans Les Coulisses D’une Vocation. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, Guy. 2014. A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • T’Jonck, Pieter. 2013. Dance in Flanders 2007–2013: An Outline of the Dance Landscape. In Perspective: Dance, ed. Vlaams Theaterinstituut, 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallas, Steven P., and Emily R. Cummins. 2015. Personal Branding and Identity Norms in the Popular Business Press: Enterprise Culture in an Age of Precarity. Organization Studies 36 (3): 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, Annelies. 2018. The Socioeconomic Dimensions of Artistic Labour: Lessons from the Contemporary Dance Scene in Brussels. In Cultural & Creative Industries in Brussels: Creativity in a divided City, ed. Rinschberg, François, Eva Swyngedouw and Jef Vlegels, 141–162 Brussels: Brussels University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Chasing Your Own Tail: The Inclusive Artist’s Process in Project-Based Contemporary Dance. European Journal of Theatre and Performance 2: 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, Annelies, and Rudi Laermans. 2016. Contemporary Dance Artists in Brussels: A Descriptive Report on Their Socio-Economic Position. Ghent/Leuven: S:PAM/CeSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Contemporary Dance Artists in Berlin: A Descriptive Report on Their Socio-Economic Position. Ghent/Leuven: S:PAM/CeSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virno, Paolo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujanović, Ana. 2013. Notes on the Politicality of Contemporary Dance. In Dance, Politics & Co-Immunity, ed. Gerald Siegmund and Stefan Holscher. Current Perspectives on Politics and Communities in the Arts, 181–191. Zürich: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annelies Van Assche .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Assche, A. (2020). The Fast. In: Labor and Aesthetics in European Contemporary Dance . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40693-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics