Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disruptive Technologies, Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage as Forms of Green Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Development in Africa

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The role of disruptive energy technologies in Africa’s transition to sustainable energy generation and green economy is examined. The chapter shows that the prospects for disruptive energy technologies in Africa’s transition to sustainable energy generation and storage and green economy are good for several reasons. First, the sources of the energy these technologies generate are low carbon, more abundant, and renewable. Second, the technologies do not require expensive centralized grid systems that have created under-grid and off-grid market segments. Third, the flexible and modular nature of these technologies could allow countries to plan an energy program that would be more manageable with their budget. However, there are several problems that need to be addressed if the use of disruptive energy technologies can help Africa to transform. These include cost, low power generation, low demand and lack of investment, and no formal large-scale effort to deploy the technologies for sustainable energy generation. The chapter recommends the adoption of sustainable energy and green economy as national policy that will focus on the use of disruptive energy technologies and the supporting mechanisms that will make it successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adom, P. K. (2018). An Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Performances in Africa Under Heterogeneous Technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1170–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlborg, H., & Hammar, L. (2014). Drivers and Barriers to Rural Electrification in Tanzania and Mozambique: Grid-Extension, Off-Grid, and Renewable Energy Technologies. Renewable Energy, 61, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluya, J. (2014). Leadership Styles Inextricably Intertwined with the Alternative Energy of Solar, Wind, or Hybrid as Disruptive Technologies, Energy Sources. Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(3), 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P. (2017). Disruptive Technologies: Understand, Evaluate, Respond. New York: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, A., Kanerva, M., & Kemp, R. (2011). Integrated Innovation Policy for an Integrated Problem. Europe: INNO-Grips II Report Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayodele, T. R., Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O., & Alao, M. A. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment of Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Technologies for Electricity Generation Using Municipal Solid Waste in Nigeria. Applied Energy, 201, 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azimoh, C. L., Wallin, F., Klintenberg, P., & Karlsson, B. (2014). An Assessment of Unforeseen Losses Resulting from Inappropriate Use of Solar Home Systems in South Africa. Applied Energy, 136, 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, J., & Cruickshank, H. J. (2017). Shedding Light on the Last Mile: A Study on the Diffusion of Pay as You Go Solar Home Systems in Central East Africa. Energy Policy, 107, 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borel-Saladin, J. M., & Turok, I. N. (2013). The Green Economy: Incremental Change or Transformation? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, B. J. L., & Christensen, C. (1995). Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(January-February), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Geological Survey. (2013). World Mineral Production: 2007–2011. Nottingham: British Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., Idione, N. E., Raycraft, E. R., Shaw, R. A., Hobbs, S. F., Everett, P., Deady, E. A., & Bide, T. (2018). World Mineral Production, 2012–2016. Nottingham: British Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugaje, I. M. (2006). Renewable Energy for Sustainable Development in Africa: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buseth, J. T. (2017). The Green Economy in Tanzania: From Global Discourses to Institutionalization. Geoforum, 86, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Death, C. (2015). Four Discourses of the Green Economy in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 36(12), 2207–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, T., Lannon, S., & Eames, M. (2018). Reflections on Disruptive Energy Innovation in Urban Retrofitting: Methodology, Practice and Policy. Energy & Social Science, 37, 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini, S., Simatele, M. D., & Kubanza, N. S. (2019). Municipal Solid Waste Management in South Africa: From Waste to Energy Recovery Through Waste-to-Energy Technologies in Johannesburg. Local Environment, 24(3), 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D. B. (2014). World’s Biggest Hydro Power Project—Bigger than China’s Three Gorges—in Africa Given Go-ahead by World Bank. Available at: https://guardianlv.com/2014/04/worlds-biggest-hydro-power-project-bigger-than-chinas-three-gorges-in-africa-given-go-ahead-by-world-bank/. Accessed 1 Aug 2014.

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1984). Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P., Otter, N., Antikainen, R., Leskinen, P., Pitkanen, K., Saikku, L., Loiseau, E., & Thomsen, M. (2016). Steering Innovations Towards a Green Economy: Understanding Government Intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dütschke, E., & Wesche, J. P. (2018). The Energy Transformation as a Disruptive Development at Community Level. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 251–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, A., Rosnes, O., Shikaratan, M., & Vennemo, H. (2011). Africa’s Power Infrastructure: Investment, Integration, Efficiency. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2018). Disruption and Low-Carbon System Transformation: Progress and New Challenges in Socio-technical Transitions Research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, U. E., Pedersen, M. B., & Nygaard, I. (2015). Review of Solar PV Policies, Interventions and Diffusion in East Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2013). Africa’s Renewable Future: The Path to Sustainable Growth. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, P., & Kivimaa, P. (2018). Multiple Dimensions of Disruption, Energy Transitions and Industrial Policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karekezi, S. (2002). Renewables in Africa—Meeting the Energy Needs of the Poor. Energy Policy, 30, 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaundinya, D. P., Balachandra, P., & Ravindranath, N. H. (2009). Grid-Connected Versus Stand-Alone Energy Systems for Decentralized Power—A Review of Literature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2041–2050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. J. (2018). Energy Scenarios—Exploring Disruption and Innovation. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 247–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Brewer, E., Christiano, C., Meyo, F., Miguel, E., Podolsky, M., Rosa, J., & Wolfram, C. (2016). Electrification for “Under Grid” Households in Rural Kenya. Development Engineering, 1, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, X. (2011). Off-Grid Electrification with Solar Home Systems: The Experience of a Fee-for-Service Concession in South Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkanen, K., Leskinen, P., Kuikman, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). Green Economy and Related Concepts: An Overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C., Jr. (2012). The Search for Survival: Lessons from Disruptive Technologies. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, W. (2018). Disruptive Innovation and Energy Transitions: Is Christensen’s Theory Helpful? Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moner-Girona, M., Ghanadan, R., Solano-Peralta, M., Kougias, I., Bódis, K., Huld, T., & Szabó, S. (2016). Adaptation of Feed-in Tariff for Remote Mini-grids: Tanzania as an Illustrative Case. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monforti, F. (2011). Renewable Energies in Africa. Luxembourg: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca, L., Neij, L., Markandya, A., Hennicke, P., & Yan, J. (2016). Towards a Green Energy Economy? Assessing Policy Choices, Strategies and Transitional Pathways. Applied Energy, 179, 1283–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of the National Academies. (2010). Persistent Forecasting of Disruptive Technologies, Report 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1977). In Search for a Useful Theory of Innovations. Research Policy, 6, 36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Towards Green Growth. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori-Amoah, B. (1995). Regional Impact on Technological Change: The Evolution and Development of the Twin-Wire Paper Machine from 1950 to 1968. Environment & Planning A, 27, 1503–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori-Amoah, B. (2019). Africa’s Geography: Dynamics of Place, Cultures, and Economies. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otieno, H. O., & Awange, J. L. (2006). Energy Resources in East Africa: Opportunities and Challenges. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (2013). Will Huge New Hydro Projects Bring Power to Africa’s People? http://e360.yale.edu/feature/will_huge_new_hydro_projects_bring_power_to_africas_people/2656/. Accessed 1 Aug 2014.

  • Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegels, A., Vidican-Auktor, G., Lutkenhorst, W., & Altenburg, T. (2018). Politics of Green Energy Policy. Journal of Environment & Development, 27(1), 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi, H., Nzabanita, E., & Santi, E. (2012). Energy Sector. In E. Santi, S. B. Romdhane, & W. Shaw (Eds.), Unlocking North Africa’s Potential through Regional Integration: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 26–54). Tunis-Belvedere: African Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprei, F. (2018). Disrupting Mobility. Energy Research & Social Sciences, 37, 238–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Breakthrough Institute. (2016). Energy for Human Development [Online]. Available at: https://thebreakthrough.org/articles/energy-for-human-development. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.

  • Tryou, T. (2016). The Five Biggest Wind Energy Markets in Africa. Available at: http://www.renewableenergyfocus.com/view/44926/the-five-biggest-wind-energy-markets-in-africa/. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.

  • Tyfield, D. (2018). Innovating Innovation—Disruptive Innovation in China and the Low-Carbon Transition of Capitalism. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN WCED. (1987). Our Common Future—The Brundtland Report. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2011). Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers. France: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2015). Building Inclusive Green Economies in Africa Experience and Lessons Learned, 2010–2015. Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R. K., & Singh, S. N. (2013). A Review of Mini-Grid Used for Electrification in Rural Areas. American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, 3(2), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, N. (2017). Disruptive Technologies. Magazine of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 25 (8), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, T. (2015). The New ‘Passive Revolution’ of the Green Economy and Growth Discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of Neoliberal Capitalism. New Political Economy, 20(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J., Jomantas, S., Jones, E., Ansari, M. S., & de Vries, L. (2019). The Fantasy of the Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project on the River Congo. Water, 11(407), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2018). Disruptive Low-Carbon Innovations. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., & Tyfield, D. (2018). Critical Perspectives on Disruptive Innovation and Energy Transformation. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2018). Tracking SDG7: The Energy Progress Report. A Joint Report of the Custodian Agencies. The World Bank Group: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

    Benjamin Ofori-Amoah

Authors
  1. Benjamin Ofori-Amoah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Ofori-Amoah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

    Peter Arthur

  2. African Development Bank, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

    Kobena T. Hanson

  3. Department of Sociology, Grant MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Korbla P. Puplampu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ofori-Amoah, B. (2020). Disruptive Technologies, Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage as Forms of Green Economy. In: Arthur, P., Hanson, K., Puplampu, K. (eds) Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Development in Africa. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40647-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation