Abstract
“Pinero’s Old-Fashioned Playgoer” focuses on Arthur Wing Pinero’s Society play The Second Mrs. Tanqueray (1893). Pinero, I argue, responds to Ibsen’s challenge to idealized conventional marriage by depicting and ultimately dismissing alternative forms of union—in particular, an unconventional marriage that endeavors to level the sexual double standard. Whereas Ibsen and Shaw criticize the melodramatic behaviors and assumptions that they associate with traditional marriage relationships, Pinero implies that attempts to circumvent or discard these conventions are likely to prove even more theatrical and less successful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Shaw’s more acrid reviews of Pinero were carefully laced with disclaimers, as, for example, in his conclusion on The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith : “Many passages of the play, of course, have all the qualities which have gained Mr. Pinero his position as a dramatist; but I shall not dwell on them, as, to tell the truth, I disliked the play so much that nothing would induce me to say anything good of it” (TN1, 65).
- 2.
See, for example, Susan L. Carlson, “Two Genres and Their Women: The Problem Play and the Comedy of Manners in the Edwardian Theatre”; Heather Anne Wozniak, “The Play with a Past: Arthur Wing Pinero’s New Drama”; and Rudolf Weiss, “‘Our Little Parish of St. James’s’: Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity in the 1890s London Theatre.”
- 3.
For comments on the ways in which Mrs. Linden follows and diverges from the traditional confidant role in A Doll’s House , see Chap. 2.
- 4.
In “Lady Hamilton, Nelson’s Enchantress, and the Creation of Pygmalion,” Jesse Hellman gives a fascinating account of the production and reception of Nelson’s Enchantress, discussing its importance in the relationship between Shaw and Campbell and suggesting Home’s portrayal of Lady Hamilton as a possible prototype for Eliza Doolittle.
- 5.
For details on burlesque conventions, as well as some samples of the genre, see Richard W. Schoch, Victorian Theatrical Burlesques.
References
“Adelphi Theatre.” The Morning Post, August 3, 1891a.
———.” The Times, August 3, 1891b.
Archer, William. About the Theatre. London: Unwin, 1886.
———. The Old Drama and the New. Boston: Small, Maynard, & Co., 1923.
Booth, Michael. English Melodrama. London: Jenkins, 1965.
Braddon, Mary Elizabeth. Lady Audley’s Secret. Edited by Pyckett Lyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Caird, Mona. “Marriage.” The Westminster Review, December 1888.
Carlson, Susan L. “Two Genres and Their Women: The Problem Play and the Comedy of Manners in the Edwardian Theatre.” The Midwest Quarterly 24, no. 4 (1985): 413–24.
Davidoff, Leonore. The Best Circles: Women and Society in Victorian England. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1973.
Fyfe, Hamilton. Sir Arthur Pinero’s Plays and Players. London: Ernest Benn, 1930.
Hamilton, Clayton. “Introduction.” In The Social Plays of Arthur Wing Pinero, by Arthur Wing Pinero and edited by Clayton Hamilton, 3–36. New York: Dutton, 1917.
Hellman, Jesse. “Lady Hamilton, Nelson’s Enchantress, and the Creation of Pygmalion.” SHAW: The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies 36, no. 2 (2015): 213–37.
Hutton, R. H. “Mr. George Meredith’s ‘Modern Love.’” In Modern Love and the Poems of the English Roadside, with Poems and Ballads, edited by Rebecca N. Mitchell and Criscillia Benford, 180–84. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Jones, Doris Arthur. Taking the Curtain Call: The Life and Letters of Henry Arthur Jones. New York: Macmillan, 1930.
Kaplan, Joel H. “Pineroticism and the Problem Play: Mrs. Tanqueray, Mrs. Ebbsmith, and ‘Mrs. Pat.’” In British Theatre in the 1890s, edited by Richard Foulkes, 38–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Meeuwis, Michael. “Representative Government: The ‘Problem Play,’ Quotidian Culture, and the Making of Social Liberalism.” ELH 80, no. 4 (2013): 1093–120.
Meredith, George. Modern Love. In Modern Love and the Poems of the English Roadside, with Poems and Ballads, edited by Rebecca N. Mitchell and Criscillia Benford, 21–72. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Morton, Agnes H. Etiquette: Good Manners for All People. Philadelphia: Penn, 1892.
Nicoll, Allardyce. British Drama. New York: Crowell, 1925.
Pinero, Arthur Wing. The Benefit of the Doubt. Rahway, NJ: Mershon, 1895.
———. The Collected Letters of Sir Arthur Pinero. Edited by J. P. Wearing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974.
———. The Profligate. London: Heinemann, 1891.
———. The Social Plays of Arthur Wing Pinero. Edited by Clayton Hamilton. 4 vols. New York: Dutton, 1917.
Quigley, Austin E. The Modern Stage and Other Worlds. New York: Methuen, 1985.
Robertson, Graham. Time Was. London: Quartet, 1981.
Schoch, Richard W. Victorian Theatrical Burlesques. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.
Shaw, Bernard. Our Theatres in the Nineties. 3 vols. London: Constable, 1932.
———. The Bodley Head Bernard Shaw: Collected Plays with Their Prefaces. Edited by Dan H. Laurence. 7 vols. London: The Bodley Head, 1970.
Weiss, Rudolf. “‘Our Little Parish of St. James’s’: Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity in the 1890s London Theatre.” Prague Journal of English Studies 1, no. 1 (2012): 9–23.
Wozniak, Heather Anne. “The Play with a Past: Arthur Wing Pinero’s New Drama.” Victorian Literature and Culture 37, no. 2 (2009): 391–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christian, M. (2020). Pinero’s Old-Fashioned Playgoer. In: Marriage and Late-Victorian Dramatists. Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40639-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40639-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40638-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40639-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)