Skip to main content

Pinero’s Old-Fashioned Playgoer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marriage and Late-Victorian Dramatists

Part of the book series: Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries ((BSC))

  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

“Pinero’s Old-Fashioned Playgoer” focuses on Arthur Wing Pinero’s Society play The Second Mrs. Tanqueray (1893). Pinero, I argue, responds to Ibsen’s challenge to idealized conventional marriage by depicting and ultimately dismissing alternative forms of union—in particular, an unconventional marriage that endeavors to level the sexual double standard. Whereas Ibsen and Shaw criticize the melodramatic behaviors and assumptions that they associate with traditional marriage relationships, Pinero implies that attempts to circumvent or discard these conventions are likely to prove even more theatrical and less successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Shaw’s more acrid reviews of Pinero were carefully laced with disclaimers, as, for example, in his conclusion on The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith : “Many passages of the play, of course, have all the qualities which have gained Mr. Pinero his position as a dramatist; but I shall not dwell on them, as, to tell the truth, I disliked the play so much that nothing would induce me to say anything good of it” (TN1, 65).

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Susan L. Carlson, “Two Genres and Their Women: The Problem Play and the Comedy of Manners in the Edwardian Theatre”; Heather Anne Wozniak, “The Play with a Past: Arthur Wing Pinero’s New Drama”; and Rudolf Weiss, “‘Our Little Parish of St. James’s’: Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity in the 1890s London Theatre.”

  3. 3.

    For comments on the ways in which Mrs. Linden follows and diverges from the traditional confidant role in A Doll’s House , see Chap. 2.

  4. 4.

    In “Lady Hamilton, Nelson’s Enchantress, and the Creation of Pygmalion,” Jesse Hellman gives a fascinating account of the production and reception of Nelson’s Enchantress, discussing its importance in the relationship between Shaw and Campbell and suggesting Home’s portrayal of Lady Hamilton as a possible prototype for Eliza Doolittle.

  5. 5.

    For details on burlesque conventions, as well as some samples of the genre, see Richard W. Schoch, Victorian Theatrical Burlesques.

References

  • “Adelphi Theatre.” The Morning Post, August 3, 1891a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.” The Times, August 3, 1891b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, William. About the Theatre. London: Unwin, 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Old Drama and the New. Boston: Small, Maynard, & Co., 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Michael. English Melodrama. London: Jenkins, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddon, Mary Elizabeth. Lady Audley’s Secret. Edited by Pyckett Lyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caird, Mona. “Marriage.” The Westminster Review, December 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Susan L. “Two Genres and Their Women: The Problem Play and the Comedy of Manners in the Edwardian Theatre.” The Midwest Quarterly 24, no. 4 (1985): 413–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, Leonore. The Best Circles: Women and Society in Victorian England. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, Hamilton. Sir Arthur Pinero’s Plays and Players. London: Ernest Benn, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Clayton. “Introduction.” In The Social Plays of Arthur Wing Pinero, by Arthur Wing Pinero and edited by Clayton Hamilton, 3–36. New York: Dutton, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, Jesse. “Lady Hamilton, Nelson’s Enchantress, and the Creation of Pygmalion.” SHAW: The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies 36, no. 2 (2015): 213–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, R. H. “Mr. George Meredith’s ‘Modern Love.’” In Modern Love and the Poems of the English Roadside, with Poems and Ballads, edited by Rebecca N. Mitchell and Criscillia Benford, 180–84. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Doris Arthur. Taking the Curtain Call: The Life and Letters of Henry Arthur Jones. New York: Macmillan, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Joel H. “Pineroticism and the Problem Play: Mrs. Tanqueray, Mrs. Ebbsmith, and ‘Mrs. Pat.’” In British Theatre in the 1890s, edited by Richard Foulkes, 38–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuwis, Michael. “Representative Government: The ‘Problem Play,’ Quotidian Culture, and the Making of Social Liberalism.” ELH 80, no. 4 (2013): 1093–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, George. Modern Love. In Modern Love and the Poems of the English Roadside, with Poems and Ballads, edited by Rebecca N. Mitchell and Criscillia Benford, 21–72. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Agnes H. Etiquette: Good Manners for All People. Philadelphia: Penn, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, Allardyce. British Drama. New York: Crowell, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinero, Arthur Wing. The Benefit of the Doubt. Rahway, NJ: Mershon, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Collected Letters of Sir Arthur Pinero. Edited by J. P. Wearing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Profligate. London: Heinemann, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Social Plays of Arthur Wing Pinero. Edited by Clayton Hamilton. 4 vols. New York: Dutton, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, Austin E. The Modern Stage and Other Worlds. New York: Methuen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Graham. Time Was. London: Quartet, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoch, Richard W. Victorian Theatrical Burlesques. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Bernard. Our Theatres in the Nineties. 3 vols. London: Constable, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Bodley Head Bernard Shaw: Collected Plays with Their Prefaces. Edited by Dan H. Laurence. 7 vols. London: The Bodley Head, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Rudolf. “‘Our Little Parish of St. James’s’: Centrality, Orthodoxy and Self-Reflexivity in the 1890s London Theatre.” Prague Journal of English Studies 1, no. 1 (2012): 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak, Heather Anne. “The Play with a Past: Arthur Wing Pinero’s New Drama.” Victorian Literature and Culture 37, no. 2 (2009): 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Christian .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Christian, M. (2020). Pinero’s Old-Fashioned Playgoer. In: Marriage and Late-Victorian Dramatists. Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40639-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics