Abstract
Climate is changing; many studies of time series confirm this sentence, but this does not imply that the past is no more representative of the future, and then that ‘‘stationarity is dead’’.
In fact, “stationarity” and “change” are not mutually exclusive. As examples: (1) according to Newton’s first law, without an external force, the position of a body in motion changes in time but the velocity is unchanged; (2) according to Newton’s second law, a constant force implies a constant acceleration and a changing velocity.
Consequently, “non-stationarity” is not synonymous with change; change is a general notion applicable everywhere, including the real (material) world, while stationarity and non-stationarity only regard the adopted models. Thus, stationary models can be also adopted for environmental changes.
With this aim, in this work Authors show some numerical experiments concerning rainfall processes. In detail, a Neymann Scott Rectangular Pulse model (NRSP), with some changing temporal scenarios for its parameters, is adopted, and the derived Annual Maximum Rainfall (AMR) time series are investigated for several temporal resolutions (sub-hourly and hourly scales). The goal is to analyze if there are some particular scales in which the assumed temporal changes in parameters could be “hidden” when AMR series (which are nowadays more available and longer than high-resolution continuous time series for many sites in the world) are studied, and then stationary models for Extreme Value distributions could be adopted.
The results confirm what is obtained from analysis of AMR series in some parts of Italy, for which it is not essential to remove the hypothesis of stationary parameters: significant trends could not appear only from the observed AMR data, as a relevant rate of outlier events also occurred in the central part of the last century.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)], pp. 1–1535. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324
Trenberth, K.E.: Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47, 123–138 (2011)
EEA—European Environment Agency: Climate Change Adaptation ad Disaster Risk Reduction in Europe, vol. 15, pp. 1–171. EEA, Kongens Nytorv (2017)
ISPRA—Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale: Il Clima Futuro in Italia: Analisi delle proiezioni dei modelli regionali, vol. 58, pp. 1–64. ISPRA, Rome (2015). ISBN 978-88-448-0723-8. (in Italian)
Ban, N., Schmidli, J., Schär, C.: Heavy precipitation in a changing climate: does short-term summer precipitation increase faster? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1165–1172 (2015)
Chan, S.C., Kendon, E.J., Fowler, H.J., Blenkinsop, S., Roberts, N.M., Ferro, C.A.T.: The value of high-resolution Met Office regional climate models in the simulation of multi-hourly precipitation extremes. J. Clim. 27, 6155–6174 (2014)
De Luca, D.L., Galasso, L.: Stationary and non-stationary frameworks for extreme rainfall time series in Southern Italy. Water 10, 1477 (2018)
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D.R., Isham, V.: Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 410, 269–288 (1987)
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Febres De Power, B., Valdes, J.B.: Rectangular pulses point process models for rainfall: analysis of empirical data. J. Geophys. Res 92, 9645–9656 (1987)
Cowpertwait, P.S.P.: Further developments of the Neyman-Scott clustered point process for modeling rainfall. Water Resour. Res. 27, 1431–1438 (1991)
Cowpertwait, P.S.P.: A Poisson-cluster model of rainfall: high-order moments and extreme values. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 454, 885–898 (1998)
Cross, D., Onof, C., Winter, H., Bernardara, P.: Censored rainfall modelling for estimation of fine-scale extremes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 727–756 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-727-2018
Calenda, G., Napolitano, F.: Parameter estimation of Neyman-Scott processes for temporal point rainfall simulation. J. Hydrol. 225(1–2), 45–66 (1999)
Kottegoda, N.T., Rosso, R.: Applied Statistics for Civil and Environmental Engineers, p. 736. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (2008). ISBN 978-1-405-17917-1
Koutsoyiannis, D., Montanari, A.: Negligent killing of scientific concepts: the stationarity case. Hydrol. Sci. J. 60, 1174–1183 (2014)
Serinaldi, F., Kilsby, C.G.: Stationarity is undead: uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes. Adv. Water Resour. 77, 17–36 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
De Luca, D.L., Petroselli, A., Galasso, L. (2020). Modelling Climate Changes with Stationary Models: Is It Possible or Is It a Paradox?. In: Sergeyev, Y., Kvasov, D. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40616-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40616-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40615-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40616-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)