Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Notion of Integration in Merger and Acquisition Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mergers and Acquisitions

Abstract

Integration is the key acquisition process. In this chapter, we reject the conventional idea that integration is a unitary concept and process. We trace the evolution of this construct by identifying fragments, layers, actors, and mechanisms that together make up the integration process: Integration is not one but many processes, involving sometimes competing priorities and time horizons. We also critically analyze limitations in existing typologies that do not account for the spectrum of integrative solutions companies may rely upon. In addition, we place the integration within a broader set of change processes, such as corporate restructuring strategies or crises, which merging companies may undergo conjointly with the integration. This sheds new light on the dynamics of post-acquisition integration, outlines the importance of managing dualisms, and identifies the integration leadership as crucial to achieve a balance among conflicting priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, H., Havila, V., & Nilsson, F. (Eds.). (2013). Mergers and acquisitions: The critical role of stakeholders (Vol. 52). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angwin, D. N., & Meadows, M. (2015). New integration strategies for post-acquisition management. Long Range Planning,48(4), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenas, R. N., DeMonaco, L. J., & Francis, S. C. (1998). Making the deal real: How GE Capital integrates acquisitions. Harvard Business Review,66(1), 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenas, R., & Francis, S. (2000). Integration managers: Special leaders for special times. Harvard Business Review,78(6), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal,17(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F., Matzler, K., & Wolf, S. (2016). M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective. International Business Review,25(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & HÃ¥kanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies,37(3), 395–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Stahl, G. K., & Vaara, E. (2007). Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies,38(4), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., & Hulland, J. (1999). Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view. Journal of Marketing,63(2), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Industrial and Corporate Change,7(3), 453–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., Mitchell, W., & Swaminathan, A. (2001). Asset divestiture following horizontal acquisitions: A dynamic view. Strategic Management Journal,22(9), 817–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1993). The psychological impact of merger and acquisition on the individual: A study of building society managers. Human Relations,46(3), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1994). The human effects of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cording, M., Christmann, P., & King, D. R. (2008). Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal,51(4), 744–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, G., & Pisano, V. (2008). Unpacking the champion of acquisitions: The key figure in the execution of the post-acquisition integration process. In C. L. Cooper & S. Finkelstein (Eds.), Advances in mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 7, pp. 51–69). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Noble, A., Gustafson, L., & Hergert, M. (1988). Planning for post-merger integration: Eight lessons for merger success. Long Range Planning,21(4), 82–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, J. (1988). The art of acquisitions. Journal of Business Strategy,9(6), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. M., Reus, T. H., Lamont, B. T., & Ranft, A. L. (2011). Transfer effects in large acquisitions: How size-specific experience matters. Academy of Management Journal,54(6), 1261–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., & Vitt, J. (2000). The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management,30(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. R., & Harris, R. S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: The UK experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics,23(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Strati, A. (1988). The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies,9(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017). The process of postmerger integration: A review and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals,11(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,44(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. L. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995. Strategic Management Journal,23(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H., Schijven, M., & Gates, S. (2012). Manifestations of higher-order routines: The underlying mechanisms of deliberate learning in the context of postacquisition integration. Academy of Management Journal,55(3), 703–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemison, D. B., & Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Academy of Management Review,11(1), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, S., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management Journal,21(10–11), 1061–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, V. A., & Limmack, R. J. (1996). Takeover activity, CEO turnover, and the market for corporate control. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,23(2), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvandikov, A., & Pendleton, A. (2019). The effect of mergers and acquisitions on employees: Wealth transfer, gain-sharing or pain-sharing? British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12386.

  • Larsson, R. (1990). Coordination of action in M&A: Interpretive and systems approach towards synergy (Vol. 10). Lund Studies in Economics and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., Driver, M., Holmqvist, M., & Sweet, P. (2001). Career dis-integration and re-integration in mergers and acquisitions: Managing competence and motivational intangibles. European Management Journal,19(6), 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limmack, R. J. (2000). Takeovers as a disciplinary mechanism? In C. L. Cooper & A. Gregory (Eds.), Advances in mergers and acquisitions (pp. 93–118). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Woywode, M. (2013). Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border M&A: The Influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review,55(4), 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mari, C., & Meglio, O. (2013). Temporal issues in process research. In M. E. Hassett & E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki (Eds.), Handbook of longitudinal research methods in organisation and business studies (pp. 204–228). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist,25(2), 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meglio, O. (2015). The acquisition performance game. In A. Risberg, D. R. King, & O. Meglio (Eds.), The Routledge companion to mergers and acquisitions (pp. 163–176). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglio, O., & Capasso, A. (2012). The evolving role of mergers and acquisitions in competitive strategy research. In G. B. Dagnino (Ed.), Handbook of research on competitive strategy (pp. 237–252). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglio, O., & Risberg, A. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions—Time for a methodological rejuvenation of the field? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglio, O., King, D. R., & Risberg, A. (2015). Improving acquisition outcomes with contextual ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s29–s43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Lieb-Dóczy, E. (2003). Post-acquisition restructuring as evolutionary process. Journal of Management Studies,40(2), 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P. H., & Marks, M. L. (2003). Managing the merger: Making it work. Washington, DC: Beard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahavandi, A., & Malekzadeh, A. R. (1988). Acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly,20(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo, A. L. (1994). Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. Academy of Management Journal,37(4), 803–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. M., & Meglio, O. (2019). Playing a double game? Pursuing innovation through ambidexterity in an international acquisition program from the Arabian Gulf Region. R&D Management,49(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruchuri, S., Nerkar, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organization Science,17(5), 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal,13(S2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Chaudhuri, S. (2009). Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un) necessary. Organization Science,20(2), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal,49(2), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg, A. (2001). Employee experiences of acquisition processes. Journal of World Business,36(1), 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg, A., King, D. R., & Meglio, O. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge companion to mergers and acquisitions. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouzies, A., Colman, H. L., & Angwin, D. (2019). Recasting the dynamics of post-acquisition integration: An embeddedness perspective. Long Range Planning,52(2), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, T., & Dollinger, M. (2004). Target reputation and appropriability: Picking and deploying resources in acquisitions. Journal of Management,30(1), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D. (1988). The disciplinary role of takeovers. The Review of Economic Studies,55(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C., & Dunbar, R. L. (1992). A psychoanalytic reading of hostile takeover events. Academy of Management Review,17(3), 537–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, D. M., & Goulet, P. K. (2000). Integrating mergers and acquisitions: An international research review. In C. L. Cooper & S. Finkelstein (Eds.), Advances in mergers and acquisitions (pp. 61–91). Amsterdam: JA1 Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, L. (2005). Organizational integration of acquired biotechnology companies into pharmaceutical companies: The need for a hybrid approach.Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1051–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden, L., & Colvin, G. (2003). M&A needn’t be a loser’s game. Harvard Business Review,81(6), 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1986). Postmerger integration. The Journal of Business Strategy,7(1), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siehl, C., & Smith, D. (1990). Avoiding the loss of a gain: Retaining top managers in an acquisition. Human Resource Management,29(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger, N. (2017). The challenge of integration: A review of the M&A integration literature. International Journal of Management Reviews,19(4), 408–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teerikangas, S. (2012). Dynamics of acquired firm pre-acquisition employee reactions. Journal of Management,38(2), 599–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teerikangas, S., Véry, P., & Pisano, V. (2011). Integration managers’ value-capturing roles and acquisition performance. Human Resource Management,50(5), 651–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M. A., & Semadeni, M. (2006). Market value effects of acquisitions involving Internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strategic Management Journal,27(10), 899–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Sarala, R., Stahl, G. K., & Björkman, I. (2012). The impact of organizational and national cultural differences on social conflict and knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies,49(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review,29(2), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1988). Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal,9(2), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1989). Doing a deal: Merger and acquisition negotiations and their impact upon target company top management turnover. Strategic Management Journal,10(4), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Ellwood, J. W. (1991). Mergers, acquisitions, and the pruning of managerial deadwood. Strategic Management Journal,12(3), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Engleman, R. M., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2005). The integration journey: An attention-based view of the merger and acquisition integration process.Organization Studies, 26(10), 1501–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Castañer, X., & Souder, D. (2013). Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. Journal of Management,39(3), 604–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal,25(13), 1233–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science,13(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, M. L., Sexton, J. C., Bhussar, M. S., & Lamont, B. T. (2019). Unfinished business: Nested acquisitions, managerial capacity, and firm performance. Journal of Management,45(4), 1488–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Benevento, Italy

    Olimpia Meglio

Authors
  1. Olimpia Meglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olimpia Meglio .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meglio, O. (2020). The Notion of Integration in Merger and Acquisition Research. In: Mergers and Acquisitions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40459-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation