Skip to main content

Increasing College Student Engagement with Digital Media and a Dedicated Space: An Exploratory Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (ICL 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 908 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, college students have spent most—if not all—of their lives seeing the Internet as something natural. They are immersed in a digital environment and can’t conceive of the world without it. But there is a huge difference between making use of these digital technologies in a personal manner and using them in the context of a business.

The purpose of this study was to analyse if giving students a dedicated space (laboratory) equipped with appropriate digital media has an impact on their engagement, considering engagement in its multidimensional forms that include behavioural, emotional, and cognitive aspects.

A research group of 21 students was used, and participants were assigned to one of six teams that each worked with a different local NGO. To create the appropriate environment, an improvised lab was created in a 13 × 16-foot office using different elements to make the students feel comfortable.

After assessment using qualitative and quantitative methods, the results indicated greater engagement in all three components that was sustained for the entire semester. Behavioural engagement involved commitment and dedication to activities; emotional engagement involved energy levels and joy felt in activities; and cognitive engagement encompassed concentration and weekday work hours. the results also showed that engagement in every dimension was greater in this course than in a traditional one. the educational environment was measured as a mixture of physical environment, emotional climate, and intellectual climate, with the last element considered the most important.

This research shows that giving college students working with a challenging subject a dedicated space to work in has a strong impact on engagement levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dominguez, F., López, R.: Uso de las redes sociales digitales entre los jóvenes universitarios en México. Hacia la construcción de un estado de conocimiento (2004–2014). Revista de Comunicación. Enero-diciembre 2015, issue 14, 48–69, 22p. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P., Sarvary, M.: Network effects and personal influences: the diffusion of an online social network. J. Mark. Res. 48(83), 425–443 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reschly, A.L, Christenson, S.L.: Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, LLC 2012, pp. 3–19. Springer Science + Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finn, J.D., Pannozzo, G.M., Voelkl, K.E.: Disruptive and inattentive withdrawn behaviour and achievement among fourth graders. Elem. Sch. J. 95, 421–454 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finn, J.D., Rock, D.A.: Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 221–224 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Birch, S., Ladd, G.: The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. J. Sch. Psychol. 35, 61–79 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Connel, J.P., Wellborn, J.G.: Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In: Gunnar, M., Sroufe, L.A. (eds.) Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, vol. 23. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skinner, E.A., Belmont, M.J.: Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effect of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. J. Educ. Psychol. 85, 571–581 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finn, J.D.: Withdrawing from school. Rev. Educ. Res. 59, 117–142 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newmann, F., Wehlage, G.G., Lamborn, S.D.: The significance and sources of student engagement. In: Newmann, F. (ed.) Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, pp. 11–39. Teachers College Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helal, R.M., El-Masry, R., El-Gilany, A.H.: Quality of educational environment among egyptian medical students using dreem questionnaire. World J. Med. Edu. Res. 3(1), 6–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibrahim, J.: Review of research in learning environment. JUMMC 11(1), 7–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Conel, J.P., Spencer, M.B., Aber, J.L.: Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Dev. 65, 493–506 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks, H.M.: Student engagement in instructional activity: patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. Am. Educ. Res. J. 37, 153–184 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skinner, E.A., Welborn, J.G., Connell, J.P.: What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: the role of perceived control in children’s engagement and school achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 82, 22–32 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (eds.): Handbook of Self Regulation: Theory, Research and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmerman, B.J., Martinez-Pons, M.: Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In: Schunk, D.H., Meece, J.L. (eds.) Student Perceptions in the Classroom, pp. 185–207. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohsena, M., Debsarma, S., Haque, M.: Determining the quality of educational climate in a private medical college in Bangladesh via the “Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure” instrument. J. Young Pharm. 8(3), 266–274 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakhshialiabad, H., Bakhshi, M., Hassanshahi, G.: Students’ perceptions of the academic learning environment in seven medical sciences courses based on dreem. Adv. Med. Educ. Prac. 2015(6), 195–203 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial and the technical support of the Writing Lab, TecLabs, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delia Perez-Lozano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perez-Lozano, D., Rocha-Lona, L. (2020). Increasing College Student Engagement with Digital Media and a Dedicated Space: An Exploratory Approach. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds) The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics