Abstract
Culturalist understandings connect transnational marriage with ‘traditional’ gender and family relationships, contrasted with models of ‘modern’ egalitarian European gender relations which are taken as a sign of cultural integration. Previous chapters of this volume have considered gender issues in relation to education, employment and social life. In this chapter, we explore another prominent topic in this area: extended family living. The Labour Force Survey data reveals that rates living in extended families are patterned by couple type, with particularly high rates among migrant wife couples. For both transnational and intranational couples, women sometimes find living with their in-laws constraining. For some British Pakistani women, a transnational marriage offers the opportunity to avoid the role of daughter-in-law, and so may offer increased autonomy and/or the opportunity to remain living with or near their natal family. Migrant husbands, conversely, are often in the culturally unusual position of being dependent on their wife and her family for accommodation. The qualitative data also, however, points to ways in which extended family living can function to enhance processes of integration, providing practical, emotional and financial support enabling couples to invest in their careers or business, or to save for their own property.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aybek, C. M., Straßburger, G., & Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ. (2015). Marriage migration from Turkey to Germany: Risks and coping strategies of transnational couples. In Spatial mobility, migration, and living arrangements (pp. 23–42). Cham: Springer.
Bhachu, P. (1988). Apni Marzi Kardi: home and work: Sikh migrant women in Britain. In S. Westwood & P. Bhachu (Eds.), Enterprising women (pp. 76–102). London: Routledge.
Casey, L. (2016). The Casey review: A review into opportunity and integration. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
Casier, M., Heyse, P., Clycq, N., Zemni, S., & Timmerman, C. (2013). Breaking the in-group out-group: Shifting boundaries in transnational partner choice processes of individuals of Moroccan, Tunisian, Algerian, Turkish, Punjabi Sikh, Pakistani and Albanian descent in Belgium. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 460–478.
Charsley, K. (2005a). Vulnerable brides and transnational Ghar Damads: Gender, risk and ‘adjustment’ among Pakistani marriage migrants to Britain. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12(2–3), 381–406.
Charsley, K. (2005b). Unhappy husbands: Masculinity and migration in transnational Pakistani marriages. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(1), 85–105.
Charsley, K. (2013). Transnational Pakistani connections: Marrying ‘back home’. London: Routledge.
Charsley, K., & Bolognani, M. (2019). Marrying ‘in’/marrying ‘out’? Blurred boundaries in British Pakistani marriage choices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625131.
Charsley, K., & Ersanilli, E. (2019). The ‘Mangetar Trap’? Work, family and Pakistani migrant husbands. NORMA, 14(2), 128–145.
Charsley, K., & Liversage, A. (2015). Silenced husbands: Muslim marriage migration and masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 18(4), 489–508.
Chaudhuri, S., Morash, M., & Yingling, J. (2014). Marriage migration, patriarchal bargains, and wife abuse: A study of South Asian women. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 141–161.
Eggebø, H., & Brekke, J. P. (2018). Family migration and integration: A literature review. Nordland Research Institute. http://www.nordlandsforskning.no/publikasjoner/family-migration-and-integration-a-literature-review-article5504-152.html. Accessed 5 July 2019.
Fokkema, T., & De Haas, H. (2015). Pre‐ and post‐migration determinants of socio‐cultural integration of African immigrants in Italy and Spain. International Migration, 53(6), 3–26.
Gedalof, I. (2007). Unhomely homes: Women, family and belonging in UK discourses of migration and asylum. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), 77–94.
Glick, J. E., Bean, F. D., & Van Hook, J. V. (1997, February). Immigration and changing patterns of extended family household structure in the United States: 1970–1990. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 177–191.
Gonzales-Ferrer, A. (2006). Who do immigrants marry? Partner choice among single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 22(2), 171–185.
Grillo, R. (2008). The family in dispute: Insiders and Outsiders. In R. Grillo (Ed.), The family in question: Immigrant and ethnic minorities in multicultural Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Grover, S. (2011). Marriage, love, caste and kinship support: Lived experiences of the urban poor in India. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494.
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.
Lievens, J. (1999). Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: The demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review, 33(3), 717–744.
Liversage, A. (2012). Transnational families breaking up: Divorce among Turkish immigrants in Denmark. In K. Charsley (Ed.), Transnational marriage: New perspectives from Europe and beyond. London: Routledge.
Liversage, A. (2019). Generational (dis)agreements—Family support, national law and older immigrants in extended households. Ageing & Society, 39(5), 899–923.
Liversage, A., & Jakobsen, V. (2010). Sharing space—Gendered patterns of extended household living among young Turkish marriage migrants in Denmark. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(5), 693–715.
Malik, A. (2016). Sofia Khan is not obliged. London: Twenty7.
Pilkauskas, N. V., & Martinson, M. L. (2014). Three-generation family households in early childhood: Comparisons between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Demographic Research, 30(60), 1639–1652.
Schinkel, W. (2011). The nationalization of desire: Transnational marriage in Dutch culturist integration discourse. Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2011(59), 99–106.
Shaw, A. (2000). Conflicting models of risk: Clinical genetics and British Pakistanis. In P. Caplan (Ed.), Risk revisited (pp. 85–107). London: Pluto Press.
Van Hook, J., & Glick, J. E. (2007). Immigration and living arrangements: Moving beyond economic need versus acculturation. Demography, 44(2), 225–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charsley, K., Bolognani, M., Ersanilli, E., Spencer, S. (2020). Family Relations: Extended Family Living, Gender and ‘Traditionalism’. In: Marriage Migration and Integration. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40252-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40252-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40251-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40252-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)