Advertisement

Working Life

Chapter
  • 134 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

This chapter looks at the relationships between employment and transnational marriage. Analysis of the LFS data shows that, whilst migrant husbands have high levels of employment, migrant wives in both groups have lower levels of employment than their British co-ethnic counterparts (although higher among Indian Sikh than Pakistani Muslim migrant wives). We find no evidence that migrant husbands restrict British South Asian women’s employment. The qualitative data showed long-standing differences in women’s employment in the families of our British Indian Sikh and British Pakistani Muslim respondents, as well as lower proportions of Pakistani migrant wives arriving with aspirations to work. Some of the migrant wives we interviewed said that the families into which they had married expected them to fulfil a domestic role, but we also found that structural issues and life course factors combine to create barriers to employment for both migrant and non-migrant wives. Whilst migrant husbands have high level of employments, they frequently have jobs in lower level occupations. The qualitative data suggests this is in part because ethnic network mainly provide access to low level occupations and in part because of structural challenges.

References

  1. Arel, D. (2001). Language categories in censuses: Backward- or forward-looking? In D. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses (pp. 92–120). New Perspectives on Anthropological and Social Demography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bhachu, P. (1988). Apni Marzi Kardi: home and work: Sikh migrant women in Britain. In S. Westwood & P. Bhachu (Eds.), Enterprising women (pp. 76–102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Charsley, K. (2005). Unhappy husbands: Masculinity and migration in transnational Pakistani marriages. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(1), 85–105.Google Scholar
  4. Charsley, K. (2013). Transnational Pakistani connections: Marrying ‘back home’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Charsley, K., & Bolognani, M. (2017). Being a freshie is (not) cool: Stigma, capital and disgust in British Pakistani stereotypes of new subcontinental migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(1), 43–62.Google Scholar
  6. Charsley, K., & Ersanilli, E. (2019). The ‘Mangetar Trap’? Work, family and Pakistani migrant husbands. NORMA, 14(2), 128–145.Google Scholar
  7. Cheung, S. Y. (2014). Ethno-religious minorities and labour market integration: Generational advancement or decline? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 140–160.Google Scholar
  8. Chiswick, B. R. (1978). The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 897–921.Google Scholar
  9. Chopra, R. (2009). Ghar jawai (househusband): A note on mis-translation. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 1(1), 96–105.Google Scholar
  10. Dale, A., & Ahmed, S. (2011). Marriage and employment patterns among UK-raised Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(6), 902–924.Google Scholar
  11. Ersanilli, E., & Charsley, K. (2019). A Good Match? Education, Labour Market Position, and British South Asian Transnational Marriage. European Sociological Review, 35(1), 133–146.Google Scholar
  12. Fernández, C., & Ortega, C. (2008). Labor market assimilation of immigrants in Spain: Employment at the expense of bad job-matches? Spanish Economic Review, 10(2), 83–107.Google Scholar
  13. Ghumman, S., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). Not welcome here: Discrimination towards women who wear the Muslim headscarf. Human Relations, 66(5), 671–698.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. B. (2014). Out of time: The temporal uncertainties of refused asylum seekers and immigration detainees. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1991–2009.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M., Rogers, A., & Anderson, B. (2013). Migration, time and temporalities: Review and prospect (COMPAS Research Resources Paper) (pp. 199–217).Google Scholar
  16. Heath, A., & Martin, J. (2013). Can religious affiliation explain ‘ethnic’ inequalities in the labour market? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(6), 1005–1027.Google Scholar
  17. HM Government. (2018). Integrated communities: Integration strategy green paper. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/696993/Integrated_Communities_Strategy.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2019.
  18. Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995). Do immigrants screened for skills do better than family reunification immigrants? International Migration Review, 29(1), 85–111.Google Scholar
  19. Jeffrey, C. (2010). Timepass: Youth, class and the politics of waiting in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kanas, A., & Van Tubergen, F. (2009). The impact of origin and host country schooling on the economic performance of immigrants. Social Forces, 88, 893–915.Google Scholar
  21. Khattab, N., Johnston, R., Modood, T., & Sirkeci, I. (2011). Economic activity in the South-Asian population in Britain: The impact of ethnicity, religion, and class. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(9), 1466–1481.Google Scholar
  22. Khoudja, Y., & Fleischmann, F. (2017). Labor force participation of immigrant women in the Netherlands: Do traditional partners hold them back? International Migration Review, 51(2), 506–541.Google Scholar
  23. Kofman, E., & Raghuram, P., (2006). Gender and global labour migrations: Incorporating skilled workers. Antipode, 38(2), 282–303.Google Scholar
  24. Kogan, I. (2004). Last hired, first fired? The unemployment dynamics of male immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 20(5), 445–461.Google Scholar
  25. Liversage, A. (2009). Vital conjunctures, shifting horizons: High-skilled female immigrants looking for work. Work, Employment and Society, 23(1), 120–141.Google Scholar
  26. Long, J. E. (1980). The effect of Americanization on earnings: Some evidence for women. Journal of Political Economy, 88(3), 620–629.Google Scholar
  27. Longhi, S., Nicoletti, C., & Platt, L. (2013). Explained and unexplained wage gaps across the main ethno-religious groups in Great Britain. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(2), 471–493.Google Scholar
  28. Luik, M.-A., Emilsson, H., & Bevelander, P. (2016). Explaining the male native-immigrant employment gap in Sweden: The role of human capital and migrant categories (IZA Discussion Paper No. 9943). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2786027. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  29. McEvoy, D., & Hafeez, K. (2009). Ethnic minority entrepreneurship in Britain. Management & Marketing, 4(1), 55–64.Google Scholar
  30. Mirza, N. (2017). Middle-class Pakistani women in Manchester (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  31. Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Nazroo, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S., & Beishon, S., (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute. http://www.psi.org.uk/pdf/Ethnic%20Minorities%20In%20Britain_small_file.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  32. Mohammad, R. (2015). Transnational shift: Marriage, home and belonging for British Pakistani women. Social and Cultural Geography, 16(6), 593–614.Google Scholar
  33. Mohn, F. A. (2019). Marriage migration and the economic trajectories of first-and second-generation immigrants in Norway. Acta Sociologica (early online view).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699319841668. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  34. Nadim, M. (2014). Transnational marriages and second generation women’s employment. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 4(3), 99–107.Google Scholar
  35. Oliver, C. (2013). The impact of restrictions and entitlements on the integration of family migrants. Oxford: COMPAS. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/PR-2013-IMPACIM_Comparative.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2019.
  36. Orgad, S. (2016). Incongruous encounters: Media representations and lived experiences of stay-at-home mothers. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 478–494.Google Scholar
  37. Orgad, S., & De Benedictis, S. (2015). The ‘stay-at-home’ mother, postfeminism and neoliberalism: Content analysis of UK news coverage. European Journal of Communication, 30(4), 418–436.Google Scholar
  38. Osaki, K. (1999). Economic interactions of migrants and their households of origin: Are women more reliable supporters? Asia and Pacific Migration Journal, 8(4), 447–471.Google Scholar
  39. Qureshi, K. (2015). Beyond code-switching: young Punjabi Sikhs in Britain. In K. Jacobsen & K. Myrvold (Eds.), Young Sikhs in a global world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Qureshi, K., Varghese, V. J., & Osella, F. (2013). Indian Punjabi skilled migrants in Britain: Of brain drain and under-employment. The Journal of Management Development, 32(2), 182–192.Google Scholar
  41. Rodríguez-Planas, N., & Vegas, R. (2011). Moroccans’ assimilation in Spain: Family-based versus labor-based migration. Middle East Development Journal, 3(2), 119–139.Google Scholar
  42. Ruiz, I., & Vargas-Silva, C. (2018). Differences in labour market outcomes between natives, refugees and other migrants in the UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(4), 855–885.Google Scholar
  43. Shaw, A. (2000). Kinship and continuity: Pakistani families in Britain. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
  44. Thapar-Bjökert, S., & Boveri, K. (2014). Gender and the ‘integrationist turn’: Comparative perspectives on marriage migration in the UK and Sweden. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 17(2), 149–165.Google Scholar
  45. Verbakel, E., & De Graaf, P. M. (2009). Partner effects on labour market participation and job level: Opposing mechanisms. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 635–654.Google Scholar
  46. Vincent, C., Braun, A., & Ball, S. J. (2008). Childcare, choice and social class: Caring for young children in the UK. Critical Social Policy, 28(1), 5–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sociology, Politics and International StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.BristolUK
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Centre on Migration, Policy and SocietyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations