Skip to main content

Surge Tank Functionality and System Stability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hydraulic Transients and Computations

Abstract

Each hydraulic system in a hydropower station usually involves one or more surge tanks . Such a surge tank behaves as a significant component. It enables the hydraulic system to be rapidly started and stopped. Its essential functions have been found to relieve the system pressure and to stabilize the system operations under conditions of hydraulic transients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When the inlet is not found at the same height as the node point m, then the gravitational force in the branch has to be added, in order to obtain pressure head h at the node (m) under the surge tank. Consequently, the same equation of motion is again obtained.

  2. 2.

    The height z in Eq. (4.34) and Fig. 4.5 is the same parameter as the height h3 − z3 in Eq. (5.29) and Fig. 5.3, with z3 = 83 m.

  3. 3.

    This assumption is only conditionally correct. In many cases, the throttle resistance is intentionally enlarged to effectively dampen the flow oscillations, see Sect. 5.2.5. The system under Thoma’s concern is thus usually always stable. In the current context of deriving the Thoma criterion, the neglect of the throttle resistance is primarily because of the small volume flow rate \( Q_{3} \) (surge tank) against the volume flow rate \( Q_{1} \) in the penstock, see Fig. 5.4, for instance.

References

  • Chaudhry, M. H. (2014). Applied hydraulic transients (3rd ed.). New York Inc: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, J. & Mosonyi, E. (2009) Wasserkraftanlagen (5 Auflage). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, D. (1910). Theorie des Wasserschlosses bei selbsttätig geregelten Turbinenanlagen, Dissertation, Kgl. Technische Hochschule zu München, Oldenburg in München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2012). Hydrodynamisches Verhalten von Wasserschlössern im Triebwassersystems Gr2 und Gr3, technical report, Oberhasli Hydroelectric Power Company (KWO), Innertkirchen, Switzerland, Nr. A000246540.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zh. Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, Z. (2020). Surge Tank Functionality and System Stability. In: Hydraulic Transients and Computations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40233-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40233-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40233-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics