Getting Ready to Work with Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom: A Study with Argentine Teachers

Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 52)


This study observed how Argentine teachers began to implement socio-scientific issue (SSI) approaches following a professional development program, as well as the effect that these approaches had on students´ perspectives of their engagement with science lessons. Fifty teachers participated in an introductory workshop after which they identified challenges or opportunities they perceived from the approaches suggested. Then, three teachers participated in a personalized year-long follow-up that supported them in introducing the SSI strategies to their classrooms. Although the teachers were concerned that students might not respond well to the SSI activities, this did not occur, with all teachers feeling satisfied with the experience and student progress. Throughout the follow-up, all the teachers were able to implement some elements of SSI approaches although the extent to which this was successful and endured over time depended on each teacher’s initial starting points with regards to both their content knowledge and views of science learning. Our results suggest that providing teachers with a chance to strengthen their practice in a stepwise manner, starting with the implementation of given or co-planned activities, before moving on to more individual adaptations and full adoption of the different techniques and strategies, has the potential to increase the engagement, interest and perception of relevance of science education for students.


Professional development Socio-scientific Student experience 


  1. Caga-anan, K. P., & O’Toole, J. M. (2015). Pre-service science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science and its relationship to classroom practice. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal (APHERJ), 2(1).Google Scholar
  2. Cofré, H., González-Weil, C., Vergara, C., Santibáñez, D., Ahumada, G., Furman, M., Podestá, M. E., Camacho, J., Gallego, R., & Pérez, R. (2015). Science teacher education in South America: The case of Argentina, Colombia and Chile. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Díaz-Moreno, N., & Jiménez-Liso, R. (2013). Las controversias sociocientíficas como contexto en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Departamento de Educación. Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
  4. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45–52.Google Scholar
  5. España Ramos, E., & Prieto Ruz, T. (2010). Problemas socio-científicos y enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias. Revista de Investigación en la Escuela, 71, 17–24.Google Scholar
  6. Evagorou, M., & Puig Mauriz, B. (2017). Engaging elementary school pre-service teachers in modeling a socioscientific issue as a way to help them appreciate the social aspects of science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 113–123.Google Scholar
  7. Evagorou, M., Albe, V., Angelides, P., Couso, D., Chirlesan, G., Evans, R. H., Dillon, J., Garrido, A., Guven, D., Mugaloglu, E., & Nielsen, J. A. (2014). Preparing pre-service science teachers to teach socio-scientific (SSI) argumentation. Science Teacher Education, 69(39–48).Google Scholar
  8. Furman, M., Luzuriaga, M., Taylor, I., Anauati, M. V., & Podestá, M. (2018). Abriendo la “caja negra”del aula de ciencias: un estudio sobre la relación entre las prácticas de enseñanza y las capacidades de pensamiento que se promueven en los alumnos [Opening the “black box” of the science classroom: A study on the relationship between teaching practices and thinking skills that are promoted in students]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 36(2), 81–103.Google Scholar
  9. Furman, M. (2018). La educación científica en las aulas de América Latina [Scientific Education in Latin American Classrooms], Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología – Iberoamericana e Interamericana. El Estado de la Ciencia, 2018.47–72. Retrieved from:
  10. Gray, D. S., & Bryce, T. (2006). Socio-scientific issues in science education: Implications for the professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. Center for Public Education, 1, 1–47.Google Scholar
  12. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S-W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education 35(12), 2079–2113.Google Scholar
  14. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. In Joyce, B & Showers, B. (2002). Designing training and peer coaching: Our needs for learning, VA, USA, ASCD.Google Scholar
  15. Labate, H. (2007). Science education: A (pending) chapter in the curriculum transformation in Argentina. Prospects, 37(4), 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, J. D. (2000). The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In Science, technology, and society (pp. 21–47). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen, J. A., & Evans, R. H. (2015). Possibilities and limitations from a short methods course in socioscientific teaching. Paper presented at NARST, Chicago, IL, United States.Google Scholar
  18. Pitiporntapin, S., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Teaching based on socioscientific issues in science classrooms: A review study. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 119–136.Google Scholar
  19. Pitiporntapin, S., Yutakom, N., & Sadler, T. D. (2016, December). Thai pre-service science teachers’ struggles in using Socio-scientific Issues (SSIs) during practicum. In Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and teaching (Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 1–20). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Pugh, K. J., Bergstrom, C. M., Heddy, B. C., & Krob, K. E. (2017). Supporting deep engagement: The teaching for transformative experiences in science (TTES) model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 629–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pujalte, A., Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Porro, S. (2015). Las imágenes deficiencia en profesoras y profesores de Biología: Entre lo que se dice y lo que se hace. Revista boletín biológica, 3, 5–10.Google Scholar
  22. Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 1–9). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Valverde, G., & Näslund-Hadley, E. (2011). La condición de la educación en matemáticas y ciencias naturales en América Latina y el Caribe. Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  26. Wongsri, P., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Learning outcomes between Socioscientific issues-based learning and conventional learning activities. Online Submission, 6(2), 240–243.Google Scholar
  27. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2016). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers Report, 33, 1–62.Google Scholar
  28. Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7–38). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de San AndrésVictoriaArgentina
  2. 2.CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations