Skip to main content
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, I sketch a theory of the relation between fiction and social reality. Aesthetic-sensual expression is found to constitute the link between social reality and the recipient. Aesthetic perception creates the specific form through which objects, institutions, and practices become visible and perceivable. Social reality is configured by the aesthetic representation in which it is mediated. Aesthetics brings into being a shared realm of experience through which identity becomes possible. It creates the relation between the individual and his/her environment. It makes the world visible and perceptible. The conflictual character of cultural controversies shows that aesthetic languages are socially contested spaces. Aesthetic controversy becomes explainable only if aesthetics is considered as representing social orders. The arts have institutionalized the aesthetic principle, which makes them a privileged space for the creation of affective structures and a driving force in the creation of social reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, John.L. 2003. How To Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Trans. Kathleen Blamey. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastner, Jens, and Ruth Sonderegger. 2014. Emanzipation von ihren Extremen her denken. Ein einleitendes Plädoyer für Bourdieu und/mit Rancière. In Pierre Bourdieu und Jacques Rancière. Emanzipatorische Praxis denken, ed. Jens Kastner, and Ruth Sonderegger, 7–30. Wien/Berlin: Turia + Kant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The Paradoxes of Political Art. In Dissensus. On Politics and Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Steve Corcoran, 134–151. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knapp, M. (2020). Conclusions. In: Cultural Controversies in the West German Public Sphere. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40086-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics