Skip to main content

Bohmian Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Quantum Mechanics
  • 1873 Accesses

Abstract

As mentioned in Chap. 2, different quantum theories without observers have been suggested and we shall present one now which is particularly well worked out: Bohmian mechanics—a quantum theory of particles in motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Foundations of Physics 12, 989 (1982). Reprinted in Bell, J. S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.

  2. 2.

    Quoted from G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, p. 433.

  3. 3.

    For more details see, e.g., D. Drr and S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics. The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory. Springer, 2009.

  4. 4.

    We must take the notion of macroscopic disjointness with a grain of salt, since it will only be true in an approximate sense (although to an excellent approximation), e.g., in the sense of L 2, which means that wave functions are close if their |Ψ|2-measures are close. In view of Born’s law (see Sect. 4.2), this sense of closeness is the empirically relevant one. In short,

    $$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \varPsi\approx\tilde{\varPsi}\Longleftrightarrow P^\varPsi\approx P^{\tilde{\varPsi}}\,. \end{aligned}$$
  5. 5.

    Although macroscopic disjointness is clearly a vague notion, it is nevertheless sufficiently intuitive to be practical. To understand macroscopically disjoint y-supports, a configuration space picture might be helpful.

  6. 6.

    See S. Goldstein und W. Struyve, On the uniqueness of quantum equilibrium in Bohmian mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics 128 (5), 1197–1209 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Actually, it suffices to require that every member of the ensemble have effective wave function φ i, from which the product structure of the ensemble wave function then follows. See, for example, D. Dürr and S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics. The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory. Springer, 2009.

  8. 8.

    Note that the subsystem coordinates X 1, …, X M are coarse-graining functions of the universal coordinates Q, where the universal configuration space is the fundamental Ω space in the sense of probability theory.

  9. 9.

    D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. In: Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy, Springer, 2013.

  10. 10.

    Concerning its role at the beginning of quantum physics, de Broglie said in the Solvay conference Électrons et Photons, Paris 1928, p. 111: Il semble un peu paradoxal de construire un espace de configuration avec des coordonnées de points qui n’existent pas. (We leave the translation to the reader.) It should be noted that the configuration space of identical particles is an old concept, sitting right at the heart of Boltzmann’s statistical mechanics. But in classical physics the topology of the configuration space plays little role, contrary to the situation in quantum physics, as we shall see. In fact, it is the entanglement of the wave function that changes the picture.

  11. 11.

    To be precise, we still need to prove that in a representation either γ τ = 1, ∀τ, or γ τ = −1, ∀τ. This is true because the permutation group can in fact be generated by elements of the form τ ∘ τ 0 ∘ τ for a fixed τ 0.

  12. 12.

    For further details we refer to D. Drr, S. Goldstein, J. Taylor, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, Topological factors derived from Bohmian mechanics, Ann. H. Poincar 7, 791–807 (2006), reprinted in D. Drr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy, Springer, 2013.

  13. 13.

    The German word often used here is “unanschaulich”.

  14. 14.

    For more on this, see D. Dürr and S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics. The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory. Springer, 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dürr, D., Lazarovici, D. (2020). Bohmian Mechanics. In: Understanding Quantum Mechanics . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40068-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics