Skip to main content

Partnerships in Shrinking Cities: Making Baltimore ‘Liveable’?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partnerships for Livable Cities

Abstract

The governance imperative to increase the City of Baltimore’s population and thus alleviate its ‘fiscal squeeze’ has brought the liveability of this shrinking city to the fore. City government has long engaged in seeking partnership with private (corporate and non-profit) actors to develop and deliver a policy agenda to stabilise and grow the city. Drawing from empirical research into collaborative governance in Baltimore, this chapter focuses on neighbourhood policy to examine the range of (explicit and implicit) liveability policies and initiatives. By considering the challenge of making Baltimore ‘liveable’ in terms of for whom and where/which neighbourhoods, the research reveals the challenges posed by the city’s deep inequities and exclusionary governance to the realisation of ‘liveability’ for all. It thus challenges how the liveability concept elides the trade-offs regarding who (and where) is included and excluded from the policies which result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • (BNIA-JFI) Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance-Jacob France Institute. (2016). Evaluation of the Baltimore City Vacants to value program: Quantitative analysis. Baltimore: BNIA-JFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnekov, T., Rich, D., & Warren, R. (1981). The new privatism, federalism, and the future of urban governance: National urban policy in the 1980s. Journal of Urban Affairs, 3(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadwater, L. (2016, September 19). City Council approves $660 million bond deal for port Covington project. The Baltimore Sun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2016, June 28). Two Baltimores: The white L vs. the black butterfly. The City Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Baltimore. (2013). Change to grow: A ten-year financial plan for Baltimore. Baltimore: Baltimore City.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Baltimore Office of Sustainability. (n.d.). Green Network. http://www.baltimoresustainability.org/projects/green-network/. Accessed 5 July 2019.

  • Clarke, A., & Cheshire, L. (2018). The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia. Urban Studies, 55(6), 3545–3562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, T. (2014, June). The case for reparations. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/. Accessed 5 July 2019.

  • Ehrenhalt, A. (2013). The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. (2015). Vacants to value. The Abell Report, 28(5), 1–28. http://www.abell.org/sites/default/files/files/cd-vacants2-value1115.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, G. (2007). Thompson v. HUD: Groundbreaking housing desegregation litigation, and the significant task ahead of achieving an effective desegregation remedy without engendering new social harms. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 7(1), 172–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when and how. New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Fernandez, C., Audirac, I., Fol, S., & Cunningham-Sabot, E. (2012). Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(2), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor’s State of the City Speech. (2015, March 9). http://mayor.baltimorecity.gov/news/press-releases/2015-03-09-mayor-rawlings-blake-delivers-16th-annual-state-city-address

  • Mayor’s State of the City Speech. (2016, February 29). http://www.baltimorecity.gov/news/general/2016-02-29-seventeenth-annual-state-city-address

  • McArthur, J., & Robin, E. (2019). Victims of their own (definition of) success: Urban discourse and expert knowledge production in the liveable city. Urban Studies, 56(9), 1711–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2007). Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: Questions of livability and state strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pill, M. (2018). Philanthropic foundations in the city policy process: A perspective from the United States. In W. Xun, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy capacity and governance: Studies in the political economy of public policy (pp. 313–335). Cham: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. (2014). Dead end: Suburban sprawl and the rebirth of American urbanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, R., Stone, C., & Worgs, D. (2015). Neighborhood policy in Baltimore: The postindustrial turn. In C. Stone & R. Stoker (Eds.), Urban neighborhoods in a new era: Revitalization politics in the postindustrial city (pp. 50–80). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szanton, P. (1986). Baltimore 2000: A choice of futures. Baltimore: Goldseker Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). QuickFacts Baltimore City, Maryland. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/baltimorecitymaryland,US/PST045217#qf-headnote-a. Accessed 5 July 2019.

  • Williams, R. Y. (2005). The politics of public housing: Black women’s struggles against urban inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeleine Pill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pill, M. (2020). Partnerships in Shrinking Cities: Making Baltimore ‘Liveable’?. In: van Montfort, C., Michels, A. (eds) Partnerships for Livable Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40060-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics