Abstract
The sustainable management of natural resources is a fundamental component that drives the economic growth of most countries. Economic crisis, poverty, and hunger have been escalating in different parts of the world due to unsustainable use of natural resources. Thus, the goals of economic and sustainable development should be defined in terms of sustainability of resources: water, energy, and food. Identifying factors affecting these resources, and explaining the interconnectedness between them, is the first step towards sustainable management of natural resources.
Several frameworks and models have been designed to help policymakers understand the complexity of the interlinkages between natural resources and assist with planning and regulating these resources. This paper describes a spatial-temporal decision support tool that analyzes energy requirements in the food sector. The tool provides policymakers with essential information to assess which energy inputs in food production are the largest and which factors might influence the increase in energy use over space and time.
The tool was developed using a web-based Geographical Information System (GIS) application in a way that allows the user to navigate over different spatial locations, select a point of interest to grow a certain quantity of a specific crop, and calculate water, land, and energy requirements accordingly. This application provides a web-mapping platform and helps users determine when and where they can grow crops based on water and energy requirements objective functions. This application is very helpful for areas with limited information on natural resources. It utilizes satellite imagery to identify major environmental features that are important for analysis. It also allows comparison between different scenarios of food production, promotes natural resources usage efficiency, and encourages greater policy coherence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
S. Shannak, D. Mabrey, M. Vittorio, Moving from theory to practice in the water–energy–food nexus: An evaluation of existing models and frameworks. Water-Energy Nexus 1(1), 17–25 (2018)
J.K. Harper, Economics of Conservation Tillage (PennState Extension. Agricultural economics, 2015)
A. Abram, D. Lynn Forster, A Primer on Ammonia, Nitrogen Fertilizers, and Natural Gas Markets (Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University, 2005), p. 38
G.D. Schaible, M.P. Aillery, Water Conservation in Irrigated Agriculture: Trends and Challenges in the Face of Emerging Demands (US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, 2012)
R. Lawford, J. Bogardi, S. Marx, S. Jain, C.P. Wostl, K. Knüppe, et al., Basin perspectives on the water–energy–food security nexus. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5(6), 607–616 (2013)
G. Rasul, Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: A nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Environ. Sci. Pol. 39, 35–48 (2014)
C. Ringler, A. Bhaduri, R. Lawford, The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): Potential for improved resource use efficiency. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5(6), 617–624 (2013)
Flammini, A., Puri, M., Pluschke, L., Dubois, O, 2014. Walking the Nexus Talk: Assessing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus in the Context of the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative; Climate, Energy and Tenure Division (NRC), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome
B. Daher, S.-H. Lee, A. Assi, R.H. Mohtar, R. Mohtar, Modeling the water-energy-food nexus: A 7-question guideline, in Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Principles and Practices, ed. by P. Abdul Salam, S. Shrestha, V. P. Vishnu Prasad Pandey, K. A. Anil, (American Geophysical Union, 2017)
B.A. McCarl, Y. Yang, K. Schwabe, B.A. Engel, A.H. Mondal, C. Ringler, E.N. Pistikopoulos, Model use in WEF nexus analysis: A review of issues. Curr. Sustain. Energy Rep. 4, 144–152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0078
E.M. Biggs, E. Bruce, B. Boruff, J.M.A. Duncan, J. Horsley, N. Pauli, K. McNeill et al., Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Pol. 54, 389–397 (2015)
A. Endo, I. Tsurita, K. Burnett, P.M. Orencio, A review of the current state of research on the water, energy and food nexus. J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud. 11, 20–30 (2017)
M. Kurian, The water-energy-food nexus: Trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Pol. 68, 97–106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.006
T.R. Albrecht, A. Crootof, C.A. Scott, The water-energy-food nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 043002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6
S.’d. Shannak, Energy and economic implications of water transfer. Open Water Journal 5(2), Article 4 (2018)
JCC. Saudi Arabia Weather Station Data, 1985–2010. Jeddah Regional Climate Center South West Asia (2015). https://jrcc.sa/
R.G. Allen, L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith, Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1998). 300p. Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56
S. Foster, D. Loucks, Non-renewable Groundwater Resources (Published in 2006 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2006)
R.F. Weiner, R.A. Matthews, Environmental Engineering, 4th edn. (Butterworth Heinemann, 2003)
U. Helden, An assessment of woody biomass, community forests, land use and soil erosion in Ethiopia. Lund University Press (1987)
P.A. Burrough, P.F.M. van Gaans, R. Hootsmans, Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 77(2–4), 115–135 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Land Suitability Analysis
Appendix: Land Suitability Analysis
-
Hundred Landsat 8 satellite scenes covering all of Saudi Arabia for the month of June and July 2015 have been downloaded from USGS and processed in ArcGIS 10.3 environment.
-
Satellite imagery was georeferenced. Color enhancement was done in such a way to be able to digitize various sections and features of the land layer.
-
The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) procedures were applied to assess whether the target being observed contains live green vegetation or not.
-
The next step was to classify the imagery into two main classes; vegetated and not- vegetated. This was followed by vectorization, which involves the conversion of raster data to vector by digitization.
-
Street and residential layers were placed on the top of the analyzed imagery layer. Points of intersections were exported to exclude potential future agriculture activities where residential and paved streets took place.
-
DEM layer was generated and slopes were calculated all over the topography to determine hilly and flat areas.
-
Potential new agricultural areas were determined based on closeness to water sources, distance from the road network, soil cover, soil type, and land productivity.
Example: monthly crop water requirements for different cities in Saudi Arabia (Fig. 3.8).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shannak, S., Vittorio, M. (2020). A Decision Support Tool for the Assessment of Water–Energy–Food Nexus in Saudi Arabia. In: Asadi, S., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (eds) Food-Energy-Water Nexus Resilience and Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40052-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40052-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40051-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40052-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)