Abstract
This chapter discusses the approach (grounded theory) and the method (life stories) adopted for the empirical research the books draws on. It also clarifies the main methodological choices adopted, discussing issues of sampling, conduction of the interviews and selection of the excerpts of empirical materials published in the book. After a presentation of the interviewees, the chapter discusses two of the three main concepts adopted for the analysis: social practices, derived from the second generation of practice theories, and in particular from the work of Theodore Schatzki; and enactment, derived from the field of Science and Technology Studies, and in particular from the work of John Law and Marianne Elisabeth Lien. Finally, it clarifies how the different enactments of dark that could be observed in Milan in the 1980s emerged from the bundle of practices in which subcultural participation unfolded, each bundle being composed by three different kind of practices: practices deemed of key relevance to subcultural participation in all the enactments; practices deemed of key relevance to subcultural participation in one specific enactment; and practices not deemed of key relevance to subcultural participation, and yet shaped by it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Inspired by the work of the psychologist Carl Rogers (1951), when applied to the life story method, these techniques consist basically in orienting the subjects’ storytelling on themes of interest using only the speakers’ own words to summarise their narrative, or to request clarifications. These techniques aim at avoiding to introduce in the narrative themes or concepts that are alien to the interviewees.
- 2.
In Denzin’s terms (1978: 218), these are “topical life histories”.
- 3.
For more details on our sample, see Sect. 1.2.
- 4.
Our interpretation was also not refused by any of the 20 non-Milanese readers of the book we reached with a questionnaire in order to obtain some insights on the generalisability of our results outside the Milanese context.
- 5.
Together with pictures, in occasion of the interviews we also collected copies of fanzines and other cultural artefacts belonging to the interviewees.
- 6.
All the interviewees reviewed and approved their excerpts after they were edited for readability, and before their translation.
- 7.
See Sect. 6.4.
- 8.
The following excerpt, more extensively presented in Chap. 6, clarifies this apparent contradiction between the feeling of a shared identity and the perceived distance from some life conducts: “I remember seeing groups of darks drunk at three o’clock in the afternoon near the Colonne di San Lorenzo. I never liked that. I was not a prig: I just didn’t see the ‘dark path’ as compatible with certain behaviour. I’d say, ‘Look at these guys, they’re making all of us lose face!” (Donatella Bartolomei). The drunk darks are accepted as being part of ‘us’, and yet they are criticised for the way they enact dark in public.
- 9.
For an example of the analysis of the relationship between material arrangements and the practice of live gigs, in light of conflicts in canon between Milanese anarcho-punks and Creature Simili, see Chap. 3.
- 10.
The work of Pierre Bourdieu represents the main reference for the few attempts in establishing practice theory for the analysis of subculturalists’ doings. These attempts generally consist in the appropriation of one of the key concepts of the Bourdueisian theoretical framework, like habitus (Powell 2007; Driver 2011; Branch 2014), field (O’Connor 2008, 2016) or (sub -)cultural capital (Thornton 1995; Brill 2007; Jensen 2006).
- 11.
On the opportunity, and yet the difficulty of addressing the embodied and affective dimensions of subcultural practices, see Hodkinson (2012).
- 12.
- 13.
Among others, Kirsty Lohman (2017) gives the word ‘social’ in ‘social practices’ the meaning of ‘implying socialization with other members’, and distinguishes punk’s social and individual practices.
- 14.
For Thornton, subcultural capital is the ideological resource through which subculturalists acquire a respected status in a scene.
- 15.
It’s the reason why we have not considered it a fourth, distinct enactment of dark.
References
Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes?: Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.
Bennett, A. (2000). Popular Music and Youth Culture: Music, Identity and Place. London: Macmillan.
Bertaux, D. (1995). A Response to Thierry Kochuyt’s ‘Biographic and Empiricist Illusions: A Reply to Recent Criticism’. Biography and Society Newsletter, 2–6. Research Committee #38, International Sociological Association.
Blackman, S. (2005). Youth Subcultural Theory: A Critical Engagement with the Concept, Its Origins and Politics, from the Chicago School to Postmodernism. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(1), 1–20.
Blumer, H. (1954). What Is Wrong with Social Theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London and Melbourne: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Branch, A. (2014). ‘Stop Flexing Your Roots, Man’: Reconversion Strategies, Consecrated Heretics and the Violence of UK First-Wave Punk. Punk & Post-Punk, 3(1), 21–39.
Brill, D. (2007). Gender, Status and Subcultural Capital in the Goth Scene. In P. Hodkinson & W. Deicke (Eds.), Youth Cultures: Scenes, Subcultures and Tribes (pp. 111–128). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Brill, D. (2008). Goth Culture: Gender, Sexuality and Style. Bloomsbury Academic.
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York, London: Routledge.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples. London: Routledge.
Collins, H. (2011). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cortazzi, M. (2001). Narrative Analysis in Ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of Ethnography (pp. 384–394). London: Sage Publications.
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising Media as Practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132.
Dale, P. (2012). Anyone Can Do It: Empowerment, Tradition and the Punk Underground. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Driver, C. (2011). Embodying Hardcore: Rethinking ‘Subcultural’ Authenticities. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(8), 975–990.
Evans, C. (1997). Dreams That Only Money Can Buy … Or, The Shy Tribe in Flight from Discourse. Fashion Theory, 1(2), 169–188.
Ferrarotti, F. (1981). Storia e storie di vita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Ferrarotti, F. (2003). On the Science of Uncertainty: The Biographical Method in Social Research. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gololobov, I., Pilkington, H., & Steinholt, Y. B. (2014). Punk in Russia: Cultural Mutation from the “Useless” to the “Moronic”. London: Routledge.
Gosling, T. (2004). “Not for Sale”: The Underground Network of Anarcho-Punk. In A. Bennett & R. Peterson (Eds.), Music Scenes: Local, Translocal, and Virtual (pp. 168–183). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Gough, N. (2008). Life Stories. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Publications Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (p. 484). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Goulding, C., & Saren, M. (2009). Performing Identity: An Analysis of Gender Expressions at the Whitby Goth Festival. Consumption Markets & Culture, 12(1), 27–46.
Haenfler, R. (2006). Straight Edge: Clean-Living Youth, Hardcore Punk, and Social Change. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hannerz, E. (2015). Performing Punk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Healey, K., & Fraser, L. (2017). A Common Darkness: Style and Spirituality in Goth Subculture. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 29(3), 1–14.
van Heur, B., Leydesdorff, L., & Wyatt, S. (2013). Turning to Ontology in STS? Turning to STS Through ‘Ontology’. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 341–362.
Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth: Identity, Style, and Subculture. Oxford: Berg.
Hodkinson, P. (2003). ‘Net.Goth’: Internet Communication and (Sub)Cultural Boundaries. In D. Muggleton & R. Weinzierl (Eds.), The Post-Subcultures Reader (pp. 285–298). Oxford, New York: Berg.
Hodkinson, P. (2012). Beyond Spectacular Specifics in the Study of Youth (Sub)Cultures. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(5), 557–572.
Hodkinson, P. (2016). Youth Cultures and the Rest of Life: Subcultures, Post-Subcultures and Beyond. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(5), 629–645.
Hui, A., Schatzki, T., & Shove, E. (2017). Introduction. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners (pp. 1–7). New York: Routledge.
Jensen, S. Q. (2006). Rethinking Subcultural Capital. Young, 14(3), 257–276.
Law, J., & Lien, M. E. (2013). Slippery: Field Notes in Empirical Ontology. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 363–378.
Leblanc, L. (1999). Pretty in Punk: Girls’ Gender Resistance in a Boys’ Subculture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Lien, M. E., & Law, J. (2011). ‘Emergent Aliens’: On Salmon, Nature, and Their Enactment. Ethnos, 76(1), 65–87.
Lohman, K. (2017). The Connected Lives of Dutch Punks: Contesting Subcultural Boundaries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using Biographical Methods in Social Research. London, Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
Miles, S. (2000). Youth Lifestyles in a Changing World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Moore, R. (2004). Postmodernism and Punk Subculture: Cultures of Authenticity and Deconstruction. The Communication Review, 7(3), 305–327.
Moore, R. (2010). Sells Like Teen Spirit: Music, Youth Culture, and Social Crisis. New York, London: NYU Press.
Muggleton, D. (2000). Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style. Oxford, New York: Berg.
Muggleton, D., & Weinzierl, R. (2003). What Is ‘Post-Subcultural Studies’ Anyway? In D. Muggleton & R. Weinzierl (Eds.), The Post-Subcultures Reader (pp. 3–23). Oxford: Berg.
O’Connor, A. (2002). Local Scenes and Dangerous Crossroads: Punk and Theories of Cultural Hybridity. Popular Music, 21(2), 225–236.
O’Connor, A. (2003). Punk Subculture in Mexico and the Anti-Globalization Movement: A Report from the Front. New Political Science, 25(1), 43–53.
O’Connor, A. (2004). Punk and Globalization: Spain and Mexico. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), 175–195.
O’Connor, A. (2008). Punk Record Labels and the Struggle for Autonomy: The Emergence of DIY. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
O’Connor, A. (2016). Towards a Field Theory of Punk. Punk & Post Punk, 5(1), 67–81.
Piano, D. (2003). Resisting Subjects: DIY Feminism and the Politics of Style in Subcultural Production. In D. Muggleton & R. Weinzierl (Eds.), The Post-Subcultures Reader (pp. 253–265). Oxford: Berg.
Pilkington, H. (2012). Punk – But not as We Know It: Punk in Post-Socialist Space. Punk & Post Punk, 1(3), 253–266.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorising Media and Practice. In B. Bräuchler & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising Media and Practice (pp. 1–32). New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Powell, A. (2007). God’s Own Medicine: Religion and Parareligion in U.K. Goth Culture. In M. Bibby & L. M. E. Goodlad (Eds.), Goth: Undead Subculture (pp. 357–374). Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice Theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 10–23). New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2009). Timespace and the Organization of Social Life. In E. Shove, F. Trentmann, & R. R. Wilk (Eds.), Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture (pp. 35–48). New York: Berg.
Schatzki, T. (2012). A Primer on Practices. Theory and Research. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London, New York: Routledge.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London, Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
Sismondo, S. (2015). Ontological Turns, Turnoffs and Roundabouts. Social Studies of Science, 45(3), 441–448.
Spracklen, K., & Spracklen, B. (2018). The Evolution of Goth Culture: The Origins and Deeds of the New Goths. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Stahl, G. (2003). Tastefully Renovating Subcultural Theory: Making Space for a New Model. In D. Muggleton & R. Weinzierl (Eds.), The Post-Subcultures Reader (pp. 27–40). Oxford: Berg.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research – Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Thompson, J. B. (1991). Editor’s Introduction. In J. B. Thompson (Ed.), P. Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thompson, S. (2004). Punk Productions: Unfinished Business. Albany: SUNY Press.
Thornton, S. (1995). Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tosoni, S. (2017). Of Goths and Salmons: A Practice-Based Exploration of Subcultural Enactments in 1980s Milan. In P. Guerra & T. Moreira (Eds.), Keep It Simple, Make It Fast. An Approach to Underground Music Scenes (Vol. 3, pp. 279–288). Faculdade de Letras/Porto: Universidade do Porto.
Tosoni, S., & Turrini, V. (2018). Controlled Disconnections: A Practice-Centred Approach to Media Activities in Women’s Solo Travelling. In L. Peja, N. Carpentier, F. Colombo, M. F. Murru, S. Tosoni, R. Kilborn, L. Kramp, R. Kunelius, A. McNicholas, H. Nieminen, & P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (Eds.), Current Perspectives on Communication and Media Research (pp. 283–302). Bremen: Edition Lumière.
Wallach, J. (2008). Living the Punk Lifestyle in Jakarta. Ethnomusicology, 52(1), 98–116.
Welch, D., & Warde, A. (2017). How Should We Understand ‘General Understandings’? In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners (pp. 183–196). New York: Routledge.
Williams, J. P. (2007). Youth-Subcultural Studies: Sociological Traditions and Core Concepts. Sociology Compass, 1(2), 572–593.
Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tosoni, S., Zuccalà, E. (2020). The Research: Methods and Methodology. In: Italian Goth Subculture . Palgrave Studies in the History of Subcultures and Popular Music. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39811-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39811-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39810-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39811-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)