Skip to main content

Foreign Experience of Legal Regulation and Protection of Relations in the Sphere of Genome Editing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Future Economic Growth, Social Adaptation, and Technological Perspectives

Abstract

Purpose: to get acquainted with the experience of legal regulation and protection of relations in the sphere of human genome editing and to evaluate prospects of its use in the regulatory practice in Russia. Design/methodology/approach: the universal dialectical method of cognition of social phenomena and process, as well as a set of general (hermeneutical and axiological) and special (comparative legal, formal legal and modeling) scientific methods. Findings: the protection of human genome is essential in the digital era and DNA editing researches should be based not only on morality but also on legal standards. The world community has developed a number of fundamental documents governing researches of human genetic data and biological samples. Countries that are interested in developing human genome science are actively adopting regulations in this field. They try to create a good legal framework for scientists who are experimenting with genetic material. However, in practice, there are cases of violation of human rights and freedoms indicating the necessity of using the mechanism of criminal legal protection of such relations. Originality/value: editing a human genome is acceptable for therapeutic and other social purposes unless it leads to discrimination and ensures interests of an individual; international and foreign legal experience of human genome regulation demonstrates a rather cautious attitude of lawmakers to evaluation of such activities; at present the domestic legislator should pay attention to the regulatory method to influence its participants; a forming legal framework in the sphere of usage of results of scientific and technological progress will make it possible to identify areas that require the initiatives of criminal law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleksandrova Yu (2018) Traveling documents. Mach Mech 9:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blinov AG (2019) International standards for regulating genetic research and their reflection in national legislation. Bull Saratov State Law Acad 3:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chadam J (2016) Appeal from a decision of the united states district court for the northern district of California, 4:13-cv-04129-CW, https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2701506-Opening-Brief.html (accessed 12 Aug 2019)

  4. Fesyun A. (2004) USA will not demand the extradition of a Japanese scientist, https://ria.ru/20040330/556975.html (accessed 12 Aug 2019)

  5. Frumkin D, Wasserstrom A, Davidson A, Grafit A (2010) Authentication of forensic DNA samples, Forensic Sci Int: Genet 4(2):95–103

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xinhua News Agency (2019) Guangdong releases preliminary investigation result of gene-edited babies, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/21/c_137762633.htm (accessed 12 Aug 2019)

  7. Lander E, Baylis F, Zhang F, Charpentier E, Berg P and specialists from seven countries call for an international governance framework (2019) Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature 567, 165–168

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reardon S (2015) Gene-editing summit supports some research in human embryos. Nature, 3rd Dec

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tiihonen J, Rautiainen M-R, Ollila HM, Repo-Tiihonen E, Virkkunen M, Palotie A, Pietiläinen O, Kristiansson K, Joukamaa M, Lauerma H, Saarela J, Tyni S, Vartiainen H, Paananen J, Goldman D, Paunio T (2015) Genetic background of extreme violent behavior. Mol Psychiatry 20:786–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turnwald BP, Parker Goyer J, Boles Danielle Z, Silder Amy, Delp Scott L, Crum Alia J (2019) Learning one’s genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk. Nat Hum Behav 3:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the program to improve the competitiveness of Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) among the world leading research and education centers in 2016–2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander G. Blinov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blinov, A.G., Lapunin, M.M., Evstifeeva, E.V., Yakovleva, O.A. (2020). Foreign Experience of Legal Regulation and Protection of Relations in the Sphere of Genome Editing. In: Kolmykova, T., Kharchenko, E. (eds) Digital Future Economic Growth, Social Adaptation, and Technological Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39797-5_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39797-5_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39796-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39797-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics