Abstract
We discuss the major points that distinguish this study from some others on the same topic. In the domain of collective decision making, the aim is at computable optimal compromises as opposed to axiom consistency analysis in social choice. As for political philosophy, the focus is made on public determination in the sense of the Rousseauvian general will referred to by Borda and Condorcet, as opposed to the individual determination considered in public choice and mathematical economics. To enhance policy representation, we propose the Third Vote election method, which bridges direct and representative democracies. Finally, we explain how the operationalized notion of representativeness can be used in both societal and non-societal applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tangian, A. (2020). Concluding Discussion. In: Analytical Theory of Democracy. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39691-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39691-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39690-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39691-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)