Skip to main content

The Influence of Regulations on SOEs: The Perception of Polish SOEs’ Board Members

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia

Abstract

State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in Poland and Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) originate from the centrally planned economy, but, despite privatization that took place in the ’90s, they play now an important role in the market economy. After the financial crisis of 2008, the role of the state as the shareholder has also been strengthened in the most developed economies of Western Europe and the US. Nonetheless, most of the studies on SOEs in the extant literature regard Chinese companies.

The paper intends to at least partially fill this literature gap by focusing on the impact regulations have on SOEs. The study is multidisciplinary and comprises an analysis of legal regulations and a statistical analysis based on the results of a survey conducted among Polish SOEs management and supervisory boards. The study aims to: identify how regulations determine SOEs’ operations, identify SOEs’ stakeholders, identify the regulations’ influence on the agency problem in SOEs and reveal how commonly shared opinions about existing regulations could have influenced future legislative initiatives.

Even though the study was conducted in Poland, our findings are significant for SOEs in other countries, as most of the identified SOEs-specific regulations are present in all legal systems to some extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The variety of SOE’s definitions used in OCED countries are presented in Christiansen (2011, pp. 80–98).

  2. 2.

    With one exception of so-called state enterprises (pol. Przedsiębiorstwa państwowe) which were a dominant form of SOEs in Poland just after 1989. Nonetheless, due to years of commercialization of state enterprises currently their play a marginal role in the Polish economy. According to the government, there were only 19 operating state enterprises at the end of 2015 (Ministry of Treasury 2016).

  3. 3.

    In the same time it is also relatively less studied in the extant literature.

  4. 4.

    This regulation replaced law which was applicable before, i.e. the Act of 8 August 1996 on Rules of Performance of Powers by the Treasury.

  5. 5.

    Formerly it was Minister of Treasury.

  6. 6.

    According to Graniszewska and Mayer (2018) CEOs in SOEs are currently exchanged much more frequently than it was before.

References

  • Aluchna, M., & Kaminski, B. (2017). Ownership structure and company performance: A panel study from Poland. Baltic Journal of Management, 12(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arocena, P., & Oliveros, D. (2012). The efficiency of state-owned and privatized firms: Does ownership make a difference? International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G., Peng, M., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, H. (2011). The size and composition of the SOE sector in OECD countries, OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, No. 5. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Inkpen, A., Musacchio, A., & Ramaswamy, K. (2014). Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 919–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate governance codes: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance An International Review, 24(3), 222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daiser, P., Ysa, T., & Schmitt, D. (2017). Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: A systematic analysis of empirical literature. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(5), 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., & Stultz, R. (2007). Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Zhukov, V. (2000). Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graniszewska, M., & Mayer, B. (2018). Nowy szef co dwadzieścia dni. Retrieved October 28, 2018, from https://www.pb.pl/nowy-szef-co-dwadziescia-dni-910355

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungmann, C. (2007). The effectiveness of corporate governance in one-tier and two-tier board systems – Evidence from the UK and Germany. European Company and Financial Law Review, 3(4), 427–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Sztajerowska, M., & Egeland, M. (2013). State-owned enterprises: trade effects and policy implications, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 147. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzman, T., Talavera, O., & Bellos, S. K. (2018). Politically induced board turnover, ownership arrangements, and performance of SOEs. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(3), 160–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Treasury. (2016). Przekształcenia własnościowe przedsiębiorstw państwowych. Retrieved October 28, 2018, from https://bip.msp.gov.pl/bip/raporty-analizy/przeksztalcenia-wlasnos/10245,stan-na-dzien-31-grudnia-2015-roku.html

  • OECD. (2015). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. 2015 Edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). The size and sectoral distribution of state-owned enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., Bruton, G., Stan, C., & Huang, Y. (2016). Theories of the (state-owned) firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postuła, I., & Wąsowska, A. (2018). Formal and informal governance mechanisms in state-owned enterprises. Evidence from post-transitional Poland. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(4), 410–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiehll, E., & Martins, H. (2016). Cross-national governance research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance An International Review, 24(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Postuła .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Postuła, I., Kabut, M. (2020). The Influence of Regulations on SOEs: The Perception of Polish SOEs’ Board Members. In: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S.O., Tkachenko, I. (eds) Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39504-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics