Skip to main content

Power Market Reform in China: Lessons from Guangdong

In Collaboration with Chung-Han Yang and Hao Chen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector
  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

Guangdong is the largest and the most economically successful province in China. In 2017 Guangdong contributed more than 27.1% of Chinese exports, 10.9% of GDP, 8.1% of the population (c.112 m) and 9.5% of electricity consumption in China. Guangdong has relatively high final electricity prices in China (for residential and most industrial and commercial customers) and is a net importer of power from other provinces. It contains the Shenzhen special economic zone which allows the introduction of new market measures not currently rolled out across China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These data are drawn from the website of National Bureau of Statistics(NBS), http://www.stats.gov.cn/

  2. 2.

    S ee Cheng (2016).

  3. 3.

    Se e IEA (2019, p. 38).

  4. 4.

    Chau et al. (2011). See also Wen (2017).

  5. 5.

    China National Development and Reform Commission (2015a). ‘国家发展改革委关于深圳市开展输配电价改革试点’ 发改价格【2014】2379号Retrieved from: http://jgs.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfg/201411/t20141104_639639.html

  6. 6.

    See https://pm.gd.csg.cn

  7. 7.

    Guangzhou Power Exchange Center (2017a). 《南方区域跨区跨省月度电力交易规则(试行), Retrieved from: https://www.gzpec.cn/main/index.do

  8. 8.

    Bui et al. (2002) and also Andrews-Speed (2013).

  9. 9.

    See also Xinhua Finance (2015). Shenzhen given nod to pilot new power transmission, Available at: http://en.xfafinance.com/html/Industries/Utilities/2015/40163.shtml

  10. 10.

    Se e Reinhold Cohen (2015).

  11. 11.

    C heng et al. (2016).

  12. 12.

    Ch eng et al. (2016). See also Liu, D. (2017). ‘电力市场、碳排放权市场和绿色证书市场的协调发展’.Electricity market, carbon market and green certificate mechanisms development, industry perspective, China Electrical Equipment Industry, 2017.07.

  13. 13.

    See ICAP Status Report 2017.

  14. 14.

    S ee Pike and Zhe (2017).

  15. 15.

    W ang et al. (2016).

  16. 16.

    S ee China5e Research Centre (2016); China National Development and Reform Commission (2015b). ‘电力体制改革解读’. Analysis of Electricity Institutional Reform, Remin Publisher, Beijing.

  17. 17.

    Zhang (2017). See als o Zhang and Xu (2017). ‘中国能源大省电力市场建设经验分析’. Electricity Market Construction Experience of Major Provinces of Energy in China. Electric Power, 2017, 50(4): 7–10.

  18. 18.

    See People’s Government of Guangdong Province (2017a). ‘广东电力市场交易基本规则(试行)’ Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/20/c_135999956.htm

  19. 19.

    S ee Guangzhou Power Exchange Center (2017b).

  20. 20.

    Se e also Yang et al. (2017). ‘广东电力市场需求侧响应交易机制研究’. Research on Demand Response Trading Mechanism in Guangdong Electricity Market, Guangdong Electric Power, 30(5), 25–34.

  21. 21.

    Across the whole of the China Southern Grid area grid investment amounted to 77.5 bn RMB in 2016.

  22. 22.

    Source: US EIA.

  23. 23.

    S ee Chick (2007, pp. 57–83) who discusses the history of marginal cost pricing in the electricity industries of Britain, France and the US.

  24. 24.

    See, for example, Hurlbut et al. (2017) who discuss lessons from MISO’s experience for China.

  25. 25.

    S ee Stoft (2002, pp. 202–314) who discusses the complete set of energy markets and ancillary services markets.

  26. 26.

    Andre ws-Speed et al. (2003).

  27. 27.

    Zeng et al. (2004). See als o Bessembinder and Lemmon (2002).

  28. 28.

    S ee APX et al. (2013) for a description of EUPHEMIA.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    M ansur and White (2012).

  31. 31.

    See Stoft (2002, pp. 93–106) for a discussion of auction designs for electricity markets. He argues against using untested market designs. Stoft (2002, p. 101) has a discussion of the limited circumstances under which pay-as-bid might be preferred to a single price auction in electricity. For a more detailed discussion of discriminatory price auctions versus single price auctions, see Krishna (2010, pp. 173–184).

  32. 32.

    Li and Shen (2016). G uangdong Electric Power Trading Center yesterday officially launched mainly acts as a ‘matchmaker’, Top News. See also South China Energy Regulatory Bureau of National Energy Administration of PRC China (2015). ‘广东省电力大用户与发电企业直接交易扩大试点工作方案’ Retrieved from: http://nfj.nea.gov.cn/adminContent/initViewContent.do?pk=zwgk1492

  33. 33.

    Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) (2016). S ee also Sung (2017). ‘广东电力市场改革和售电策略探讨’. Guangdong electricity market reform and sale strategy, Mechanical and Electrical Information, 2017 June, 89–90.

  34. 34.

    On 7 November 2017, China NDRC just published Guangdong’s transmission and distribution charges for 2017–2019《国家发展改革委关于广东电网2017–2019年输配电价的通知》(发改价格〔2017〕969号) http://shupeidian.bjx.com.cn/news/20171107/859803.shtml See also China National Development and Reform Commission (2016a). ‘国家发展改革委 国家能源局关于印发《电力中长期交易基本规则(暂行)》’ 发改能源〔2016〕2784号Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201701/W020170112319053238252.pdf See also China National Development and Reform Commission (2017). ‘国家发展改革委关于印发《省级电网输配电价定价办法(试行)》’ 发改价格〔2016〕2711号Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzgggz/jggl/zcfg/201701/t20170104_834333.html

  35. 35.

    See China National Development and Reform Commission (2015a). ‘国家发展和改革委关于深圳市开展输配电价改革试点’ 发改价格【2014】2379号Retrieved from: http://jgs.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfg/201411/t20141104_639639.html

  36. 36.

    At $1 = 6.64 RMB.

  37. 37.

    See China Electric Council (2017) 告别无序竞争 电力市场呼吁售电专业化时代http://www.cec.org.cn/xinwenpingxi/2017-10-30/174433.html

  38. 38.

    China National Development and Reform Commission (2017). ‘国家发展改革委关于印发《省级电网输配电价定价办法(试行)》’ 发改价格〔2016〕2711号Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzgggz/jggl/zcfg/201701/t20170104_834333.html

    China National Development and Reform Commission (2017). 国家发展和改革委 《关于深化电力现货市场建设试点工作的意见》的通知, 发改办能源规〔2019〕828号, retried from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/gfxwj/201908/t20190807_943963.html

  39. 39.

    Tung and Huang (2017). ‘美国 PJM 电力市场及对广东电力改革的启示’ Experiences in PJM Market in the United States: A Good Reference for the Power Market Reform in Guangdong Power Grid, Yunnan Electric Power, 2017, 45(1). See also Zhang et al. (2015), ‘售电侧市场放开国际经验及其启示’ International Experience and Lessons in Power Sales Side Market Liberalization, State Grid Energy Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.aeps-info.com/aeps/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20151128001&flag=1&journal_id=aeps&year_id=2016

  40. 40.

    Please see the latest progress of spot market pilots in China at http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-09/05/c_136585412.htm See also Tsai et al. (2017). “英国电改专家怎么看待中国电改,给了什么建议?——专访剑桥大学能源政策研究所副所长迈克尔·波利特教授” Interview with Professor Michael Pollitt, Energy Observer, Retrieved from: http://www.eothinker.com/eo/show.php?itemid=569

  41. 41.

    S ee Ofgem (2017).

  42. 42.

    S ee Ofgem (2016) which reports that most power that is traded in Great Britain is traded in OTC (over-the-counter) contracts, not via power exchanges.

  43. 43.

    See M. Harrison, ‘Independent Energy collapses with customers still owing £119 m in bills’, The Independent, 8 September 2000. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/independent-energy-collapses-with-customers-still-owing-pound119m-in-bills-699827.html

  44. 44.

    Se e Taylor (2007).

  45. 45.

    See M. Harrison, ‘Generators exposed after collapse of TXU Europe’, The Independent, 20 November 2000. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/generators-exposed-after-collapse-of-txu-europe-128536.html

  46. 46.

    For a discussion in a European context, see Marino et al. (2011).

  47. 47.

    S ee Jamasb and Pollitt (2007).

  48. 48.

    Se e Lohmann (2001).

  49. 49.

    Se e Hermann and Pond (2012).

  50. 50.

    See Wen (2017). Sung (2017). ‘广东电力市场改革和售电策略探讨’. Guangdong electricity market reform and sale strategy, Mechanical and Electrical Information, 2017 June, 89–90.

  51. 51.

    See the official website of SESS深圳市深电能售电有限公司 (in Chinese) available at: http://www.sz-sess.com/index

  52. 52.

    See the official website of China Resource Power (华润电力) available at: http://www.cr-power.com/en/

  53. 53.

    See China Resources Power (in Chinese) ‘售电公司那么多,谁已经开始行动了?’ available at: http://www.360doc.com/content/16/0514/11/30627394_559016726.shtml

  54. 54.

    See National Business Daily (2015). ‘科陆电子、比亚迪入股民营售电公司’ available at: http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20150327/13586347_0.shtml

  55. 55.

    People’s Government of Guangdong Province (2017a). ‘广东电力市场交易基本规则(试行)’ Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/20/c_135999956.htm; People’s Government of Guangdong Province (2017c). ‘广东电力市场建设实施方案’, Retrieved from: http://dp.meizhou.gov.cn/show/index/630/15611; See also Shu et al. (2016a, b).

  56. 56.

    ‘China National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration (2016)’, 电力发展 ‘十三五”规划(2016–2020 年)’ NDRC, NEA: Electricity Sector Development under 13th Five-Year Plan (2016–2020), 25 December, 2016, Retrieved from: http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/201612/P020161222570036010274.pdf

  57. 57.

    See the official website of Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd. (广东电力设计院) available at: http://www.cccme.org.cn/shop/cccme8977/index.aspx

  58. 58.

    See Pollitt (2004) for a discussion of the case of Chile where wholesale electricity market prices have been fluctuating up and down (driven by water scarcity) since 1982. Paredes (2003) discusses the links between price fluctuations and performance in the case of Chilean public services.

  59. 59.

    Se e Newbery and Pollitt (1997) for an analysis of the impact of the introduction of a wholesale power market in England and Wales on operational and investment efficiency.

  60. 60.

    CMA (2016, pp. 183–188).

  61. 61.

    Se e Mansur and White (2012) for an analysis of benefits of market extension in PJM.

  62. 62.

    N g (2016).

  63. 63.

    S ee China Light and Power Group (CLP) (2016).

  64. 64.

    S ee China Southern Power Grid (CSPG) (2016), Corporate social responsibility report 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.csg.cn/. See also Wang et al. (2006).

  65. 65.

    Se e Ho et al. (2017).

  66. 66.

    Zh ang et al. (2014).

  67. 67.

    Se e Chen (2018). The 2017 figures for payments to generators in Guangdong are: coal −0.4505 RMB/kWh (source: http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20170418/820743.shtml), gas −0.745 RMB/kWh (source: http://shoudian.bjx.com.cn/news/20171010/854086.shtml), wind −0.61 RMB/kWh (source: http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20151215/691707-2.shtml) and solar −0.85 RMB/kWh (source: http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20161227/799707.shtml)

  68. 68.

    See Guangzhou Power Exchange Center (2017a). 《南方区域跨区跨省月度电力交易规则(试行)》, Retrieved from: https://www.gzpec.cn/main/index.do. See also Meng, T. Li, C. & Chang, T. (2016). ‘未来广东电力市场下实时调度规则思考’ Guangdong Science & Technology, 2016, 25(16).

  69. 69.

    See Shu et al. (2016a). ‘基于优化理论市场化的日前电力市场机制设计’ Day ahead Electricity Market Design Based on Market Interpretation of Optimization Theory, Automation of Electric Power Systems. Vol. 40, No. 2.

  70. 70.

    Five pricing zones across Guangdong in addition to Shenzhen.

  71. 71.

    See National Energy Administration China’s official announcement on 13 November 2017 ‘广东各价区输配电度电价最低-5.16分/千瓦时’ Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-11/13/c_136749039.htm

  72. 72.

    See NDRC’s official announcement on 22 December 2016b publishing NDRC Price Reform Document 2016 No. 2711 “省级电网输配电价定价办法(试行)” Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201701/t20170104_834330.html

  73. 73.

    On 7 November 2017, China NDRC just published Guangdong’s transmission and distribution charges for 2017–2019《国家发展改革委关于广东电网2017–2019年输配电价的通知》(发改价格〔2017〕969号) http://shupeidian.bjx.com.cn/news/20171107/859803.shtml

  74. 74.

    See NDRC Guangdong office’s Price Reform Document 2017 No. 498 ‘广东省发展改革委关于调整销售电价等有关问题的通知’ Retrieved from: http://www.gddrc.gov.cn/zwgk/zdlyxxgkzl/djml/xxml/201710/t20171017_433270.shtml See also NDRC Guangdong office’s Price Reform Document 2017 No. 498 ‘广东省发展改革委关于调整销售电价等有关问题的通知’ Retrieved from: http://www.gzns.gov.cn/zwxxgk/zdlyxxgk/jghsf/201707/P020170726493877075556.pdf

  75. 75.

    See People’s Government of Guangdong Province (2017b). ‘广东电力市场监管实施办法(试行)’ Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/20/c_135999956.htm. See also Sun and Su (2017). China, The Energy Regulation and Markets Review (Edition 6), Edited by David L Schwartz, Law Business Research for a discussion of the government institutions overseeing the energy sector.

  76. 76.

    The first legal case regarding the applicability of the Act to the power sector appeared in Shanxi in June 2017, when the regulator applied the Act to several generators. This is being challenged by the generators who are challenging whether the Act can apply given that there is not a fully competitive electricity market. See http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2017-08-08/doc-ifyitapp2997520.shtml; http://news.xinhuanet.com/2017-06/06/c_1121092318.htm; and https://hk.saowen.com/a/ba4f85af87d5d5a78c9572a60e62b11de7ac497c60818c08dad5a55649576c81

  77. 77.

    Li a nd Yu (2017).

  78. 78.

    Yudean is 24% owned by China Huaneng Group and 76% by the People’s Government of Guangdong Province (see http://www.gdyd.com/site/yudean/gsjj/index.html).

  79. 79.

    See also Yang et al. (2017). ‘广东电力市场需求侧响应交易机制研究’. Research on Demand Response Trading Mechanism in Guangdong Electricity Market, Guangdong Electric Power, 30(5), 25–34. Pang, P. (2016). ‘电力市场化改革背景下电力需求响应机制与支撑技术’. Electric Power Demand Response Mechanism and Support Technology Under Electric Power Market Reform, Guangdong Electric Power.

  80. 80.

    S ee Zhang (2017) for a commentary on this figure.

  81. 81.

    With thanks to Phil Chen for explaining this in a note: ‘Clearing mechanism of Guangdong Power Market in 2016’.

  82. 82.

    On suggestions for good auction design, see Klemperer (2002) an d Ausubel and Cramton (2011).

  83. 83.

    Feng (2016a). ‘从云南方案看新电改隐患’ Yunnan local pilot and challenges for China’s recent power sector reform, China Energy, Retrieved from: http://www.cnenergy.org/yw/zc/201602/t20160205_270260.html

  84. 84.

    See Zhang (2017). See also Tung and Huang (2017). ‘美国 PJM 电力市场及对广东电力改革的启示’ Experiences in PJM Market in the United States: A Good Reference for the Power Market Reform in Guangdong Power Grid, Yunnan Electric Power, 2017, 45(1).

  85. 85.

    Se e Feng (2016a, b) and discussions in Cheng et al. (2018) and Liu et al. (2019).

  86. 86.

    Zh ang et al. (2014).

  87. 87.

    Se e DECC (2015, p. 9).

  88. 88.

    Guangzhou Power Exchange Center (2017a). 《南方区域跨区跨省月度电力交易规则(试行)》, Retrieved from: https://www.gzpec.cn/main/index.do

  89. 89.

    For a discussion in the context of California, see https://www.eia.gov/electricity/policies/legislation/california/assemblybill.html

  90. 90.

    S ee FERC (2004) for a discussion of this in the context of setting up an independent system operator in the US. Henney (1994) presents the background to the establishment of the power pool in Great Britain on 1 April 1990.

  91. 91.

    Se e Adib et al. (2013) for a discussion.

  92. 92.

    Document No.9 is a policy document, not a law. Some local governments say that sometimes they do not know whether they should just follow policy documents and ignore the content of current Electricity Act (1996). There is therefore an urgent need to revise the current legal frameworks for China’s electric industry in line with the policy goals of the No.9 document. See China Electric Council http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20161129/792530.shtml

  93. 93.

    Zhang and Dai (2018). S ee als o Wilson, Yang, and Kuang (2015).

  94. 94.

    Se e Henney (1994, 2011) for a discussion of the reform process in the UK.

References

English

  • ACER/CEER (2019). Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring the Internal Electricity and Natural Gas Markets in 2018, Electricity Wholesale Markets Volume November, Slovenia: ACER/CEER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adib, P., Zarnikau, J., & Baldick, R. (2013). Texas electricity market: Getting better. In F. P. Sioshansi (Ed.), Evolution of global electricity markets (pp. 265–296). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, B., Lin, W., Zhou, A., & Zhou, W. (2015). China’s market-oriented reforms in the energy and environmental sectors. Paper presented at the Pacific Energy Summit. Retrieved from: http://nbr.org/downloads/pdfs/ETA/PES_2015_workingpaper_AnBo_et_al.pdf

  • Andrews-Speed, P. (2013). Reform postponed. The evolution of China’s electricity markets. In Evolution of global electricity markets. New paradigms, new challenges, new approaches (pp. 531–569). Waltham: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews-Speed, P., Dow, S., Oberheitmann, A., Ramsay, B., Smith, V., & Wei, B. (2003). First steps in power sector reform: The case of China’s Guangdong Province. Utilities Policy, 11(3), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APX – Belpex – EPEX Spot – Mercatoelettrico (GME)- Nord Pool Spot – OMIE OTE (PCR PXs). (2013). EUPHEMIA public description PCR market coupling algorithm. Available at: http://www.apxgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/Euphemia-public-description-Nov-20131.pdf

  • Ausubel, L., & Cramton, P. (2011). Auction design for wind rights. Report to Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement. Available at: http://www.boem.gov/uploadedFiles/BOEM/Renewable_Energy_Program/Regulatory_Information/AusubelCramtonPaper1.pdf

  • Bessembinder, H., & Lemmon, M. L. (2002). Equilibrium pricing and optimal hedging in electricity forward markets. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1347–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T., Yang, D., Jones, W., & Li, J. (Eds.). (2002). China’s economic powerhouse: Economic reform in Guangdong Province. Basingstoke: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, J., Noria Kia, N., Kilburn, M., & Lorrimar-Shanks, J. (2011). An introduction to Guangdong’s energy market – Proposed and future solutions. Interconnection paper, Civil Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. (2018). Analysis of inter-provincial transfers of supply contracts in South China regional electricity market. mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2016). Power retail pilots open in Guangzhou, Chongqing. China Energy Storage Alliance. Retrieved from: http://en.cnesa.org/featured-stories/2016/3/2/power-retail-pilots-open-in-guangzhou-chongqing

  • Cheng, B., Dai, H., Wang, P., Xie, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, D., & Masui, T. (2016). Impacts of low-carbon power policy on carbon mitigation in Guangdong Province, China. Energy Policy, 88, 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Chen, F., Li, G., Ristic, B., Mirchi, A., Qiyu, T., & Madani, K. (2018). Reform and renewables in China: The architecture of Yunnan’s hydropower dominated electricity market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 662–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chick, M. (2007). Electricity and energy policy in Britain, France and the United States since 1945. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • China Light and Power Group (CLP). (2016). Annual report. Retrieved from: https://www.clpgroup.com/en/investors-information/financial-reports/our-reports?year=2016

  • CMA. (2016). Energy market investigation, final report. London: Competition and Markets Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • DECC. (2015). Hydro Benefit Replacement Scheme & Common Tariff Obligation three year review of statutory schemes: Consultation. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERC. (2004). Staff report on cost ranges for the development and operation of a day one regional transmission organization. Docket no. PL04-16-000. FERC, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henney, A. (1994). A study of the privatisation of the electricity supply industry in England and Wales. London: EEE Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henney, A. (2011). The British electric industry 1990–2010 the rise and demise of competition. London: EEE Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C., & Pond, R. (2012). Concentration and disintegration: Company responses in the electricity sector and consequences for employment. In C. Hermann & J. Flecker (Eds.), Privatization of public services: Impacts for employment, working conditions, and service quality in Europe (pp. 33–54). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M. S., Wang, Z., & Yu, Z. (2017). China’s power generation dispatch. RFF report. Available at: http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-Rpt-ChinaElectricity.pdf

  • Hurlbut, D., Zhou, E., Bird, L., & Wang, Q. (2017). Transmission challenges and best practices for cost-effective renewable energy delivery across state and provincial boundaries (No. NREL/TP-6A20-67462). NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2017). China – Guangdong pilot system, ETS detailed information. International Carbon Action Partnership. Available at: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/status-report-2017

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). China power system transformation: Assessing the benefits of optimized operations and advanced flexibility options. Paris: IEA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2007). Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6163–6187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (2002). What really matters in auction design. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 169–189. Available at: http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~jkg/what-matters.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, V. (2010). Auction theory (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Shen, T. (2016). Guangdong Electric Power Trading Center yesterday officially launched mainly act as a “matchmaker”. Top News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Yu, J. Q. (2017). The propulsion of China’s electricity-sold side reform. In DEStech transactions on engineering and technology research, (apetc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Kahrl, F., Yuan, J., Chen, Q., & Liu, X. (2019). Economic and carbon emission impacts of electricity market transition in China: A case study of Guangdong Province. Applied Energy, 238, 1093–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Yang, Q., Cai, H., Yan, M., Zhang, M., Wu, D., & Xie, M. (2019). Market reform of Yunnan electricity in southwestern China: Practice, challenges and implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 113, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, P. (2001). A ‘hands-on’ or ‘hands-off’ approach in electricity distribution; outsourcing of business processes in a HRM perspective. In 16th international conference and exhibition on electricity distribution, 2001. Part 1: Contributions. CIRED (IEE Conf. Publ No. 482).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansur, E. T., & White, M. W. (2012). Market organization and efficiency in electricity markets. Retrieved from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~mansur/papers/mansur_white_pjmaep.pdf

  • Marino, A., Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2011). A snapshot of the European energy service market in 2010 and policy recommendations to foster a further market development. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6190–6198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M., & Pollitt, M. G. (1997). The restructuring and privatization of Britain’s CEGB: Was it worth it? Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3), 269–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. (2016). Chinese power generators face tougher times as deregulation sparks competition. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofgem. (2016). Wholesale energy markets in 2016. London: Ofgem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofgem. (2017). State of the energy market 2017 report. London: Ofgem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredes, R. (2003). Redistributive impact of privatization and the regulation of utilities in Chile. In C. Ugaz & C. Waddams Price (Eds.), Utility privatisation and regulation – A fair deal for consumers? Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, L., & Zhe, Y. (2017). Five Things to Know About China’s National Carbon Market. China Dialogue, December 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, M. (2004). Electricity reform in Chile: Lessons for developing countries. Journal of Network Industries, 5(3–4), 221–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP). (2016). Wholesale electricity markets and pricing in China: How is reform going? Available at: http://www.theenergycollective.com/raponline/2389923/wholesale-electricity-markets-and-pricing-in-china-how-is-reform-going-2

  • Reinhold Cohen. (2015). China’s new intellectual property courts. Reinhold Cohen IP Attorneys newsletters. Available at: http://www.rcip.co.il/en/article/chinas-new-intellectual-property-courts/

  • Stoft, S. (2002). Power system economics designing markets for electricity. Piscataway: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, M., & Su, H. (2017). China. In D. L. Schwartz (Ed.), The energy regulation and markets review (6th ed.). London: Law Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2007). Privatisation and financial collapse in the nuclear industry: The origins and causes of the British energy crisis of 2002. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Chen, H. R., Pan, W. L., & Xu, Z. (2006). Reliability and economic evaluation of the China southern power grid. In Power systems conference and exposition, 2006. PSCE’06. 2006 IEEE PES (pp. 854–859). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Luo, Y., Xie, P., Luo, Z., & Zhao, D. (2016). The key elements analysis of Guangdong & Shenzhen ETS & tips for China national ETS construction. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 14(4), 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., Yang, Y., & Kuang, J. (2015). China’s electricity sector. In Ligang Song, Ross Garnaut, Cai Fang & Lauren Johnston (Eds.) China’s Domestic Transformation in a Global Context, Canberra: ANU Press, p.175–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua Finance. (2015). Shenzhen given nod to pilot new power transmission. Available at: http://en.xfafinance.com/html/Industries/Utilities/2015/40163.shtml

  • Yu, D., Qiu, H., Yuan, X., Li, Y., Shao, C., Lin, Y., & Ding, Y. (2017). Roadmap of retail electricity market reform in China: Assisting in mitigating wind energy curtailment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 52(1), 012031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Zhang, C., Chen, L., & Xiang, X. (2004). Guangdong electric power market reform: Options and impact. Working paper #33, program on energy and sustainable development, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. (2017). China power market: Too young, too irrational. Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/china-power-market-too-young-irrational-huiting-zhang/

  • Zhang, D., & Dai, H. (2018). Financing China’s electricity sector. In L. Lester & M. Thomas (Eds.), China’s electricity sector. Singapore: Palgrave Pivot.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. L., Sun, Y. M., Jing, Z. X., & He, Z. X. (2014). Research on transfer and replacement mechanism design of inter-provincial electricity treatment in South China electricity market. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 494, 1695–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Chinese

  • China Electric Council. (2017). “告别无序竞争 电力市场呼吁售电专业化时代” Say goodbye to the unregulated competition. http://www.cec.org.cn/xinwenpingxi/2017-10-30/174433.html

  • China National Development and Reform Commission. (2015a). “国家发展改革委关于深圳市开展输配电价改革试点” 发改价格【2014】2379号. Retrieved from: http://jgs.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfg/201411/t20141104_639639.html

  • China National Development and Reform Commission. (2015b). “电力体制改革解读” Analysis of electricity institutional reform. Beijing: Remin Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • China National Development and Reform Commission. (2016a). “国家发展改革委 国家能源局关于印发《电力中长期交易基本规则(暂行)》” 发改能源〔2016〕2784号. Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201701/W020170112319053238252.pdf

  • China National Development and Reform Commission. (2016b, December 22). “省级电网输配电价定价办法(试行)” NDRC price reform document 2016 no. 2711. Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201701/t20170104_834330.html

  • China National Development and Reform Commission. (2017). “国家发展改革委关于印发《省级电网输配电价定价办法(试行)》” 发改价格〔2016〕2711号. Retrieved from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzgggz/jggl/zcfg/201701/t20170104_834333.html

  • China National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration. (2016, December 25). “电力发展“十三五”规划(2016–2020 年)” NDRC, NEA: Electricity sector development under 13th five-year plan (2016–2020). Retrieved from: http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/201612/P020161222570036010274.pdf.

  • China National Development and Reform Commission Guangdong. (2017). “广东省发展改革委关于调整销售电价等有关问题的通知” Price reform document 2017 no. 498. Retrieved from: http://www.gzns.gov.cn/zwxxgk/zdlyxxgk/jghsf/201707/P020170726493877075556.pdf

  • China National Energy Administration. (2017, November 13). “广东各价区输配电度电价最低-5.16分/千瓦时”. Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-11/13/c_136749039.htm

  • China Resources Power. (2016). “售电公司那么多,谁已经开始行动了?” Available at: http://www.360doc.com/content/16/0514/11/30627394_559016726.shtml

  • China Southern Power Grid (CSPG). (2016). Corporate social responsibility report 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.csg.cn/

  • China5e Research Centre. (2016). “中国电改试点进展政策研究与建议” The policy study of China’s power sector reform pilot project development and recommendations. China5e research centre report. Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y.-C. (2016a). “从云南方案看新电改隐患” Yunnan local pilot and challenges for China’s recent power sector reform. China Energy. Retrieved from: http://www.cnenergy.org/yw/zc/201602/t20160205_270260.html

  • Feng, Y.-C. (2016b). “如何理解中国电力体制改革:市场化与制度背景” How to understand China’s power sector reform: Market reforms and institutional context. Retrieved from: http://www.chinareform.org.cn/economy/price/refer/201611/t20161130_25845

  • Guangzhou Power Exchange Center. (2017a). 《南方区域跨区跨省月度电力交易规则(试行)》. Retrieved from: https://www.gzpec.cn/main/index.do

  • Guangzhou Power Exchange Center. (2017b). “广东电力市场2017年半年报告” 2017 Guangdong electricity market report (January to June). Retrieved from: https://www.gzpec.cn/main/index.do

  • Jing, Z., Chen, Z., & Zhu, J. (2018). “中国电力市场月度竞价机制介绍与分析” Introduction and analysis on monthly centralized bidding rules of power market in China, walking into the electricity market 走进电力市场. South China University of Technology (SCUT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D. (2017). “电力市场、碳排放权市场和绿色证书市场的协调发展.”Electricity market, carbon market and green certificate mechanisms development, Industry perspective, China Electrical Equipment Industry, 2017.07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, T. Li, C. & Chang, T. (2016). “未来广东电力市场下实时调度规则思考” GuangDong Science & Technology, 2016, 25(16).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Business Daily. (2015). “科陆电子、比亚迪入股民营售电公司”. Available at: http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20150327/13586347_0.shtml

  • Pang, P. (2016). “电力市场化改革背景下电力需求响应机制与支撑技术.” Electric power demand response mechanism and support technology under electric power market reform. Guangdong Electric Power, 29(1), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Government of Guangdong Province. (2017a). “广东电力市场交易基本规则(试行)”. Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/20/c_135999956.htm

  • People’s Government of Guangdong Province. (2017b). “广东电力市场监管实施办法(试行)”. Retrieved from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/20/c_135999956.htm

  • People’s Government of Guangdong Province. (2017c). “广东电力市场建设实施方案”. Retrieved from: http://dp.meizhou.gov.cn/show/index/630/15611

  • Shu, C., Zhong, H., & Xia, Q. (2016a). “基于优化理论市场化的日前电力市场机制设计”Day ahead electricity market design based on market inter-pretation of optimization theory. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 40(2), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, C., Zhong, H., Xia, Q., Tan, Y., Hu, J., Yeo, X., & Wang, Y. (2016b). Monthly elasticity of the electricity market mechanism design. Proceedings of the CSEE, 36(3), 587–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • South China Energy Regulatory Bureau of National Energy Administration of PRC China. (2015). “广东省电力大用户与发电企业直接交易扩大试点工作方案”. Retrieved from: http://nfj.nea.gov.cn/adminContent/initViewContent.do?pk=zwgk1492

  • Sung, Y. (2017). “广东电力市场改革和售电策略探讨.” Guangdong electricity market reform and sale strategy, Mechanical and Electrical Information, 2017 June, 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, et al. (2017). “英国电改专家怎么看待中国电改,给了什么建议? —— 专访剑桥大学能源政策研究所副所长迈克尔·波利特教授” Interview with Professor Michael Pollitt. Energy Observer. Retrieved from: http://www.eothinker.com/eo/show.php?itemid=569

  • Tung, C. & Huang, S. (2017). “美国 PJM 电力市场及对广东电力改革的启示”Experiences in PJM Market in the United States: A Good Reference for the Power Market Reform in Guangdong Power Grid, Yunnan Electric Power, 45(1), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, H. (2017, February). “广东试轨” Guangdong pilot. Energy Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Tseng, C., Wang, F., & Guo, M. (2017). “广东电力市场需求侧响应交易机制研究.”Research on demand response trading mechanism in Guangdong electricity market. Guangdong Electric Power, 30(5), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, et al. (2015). “售电侧市场放开国际经验及其启示” International experience and lessons in power sales side market liberalization. State Grid Energy Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.aeps-info.com/aeps/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20151128001&flag=1&journal_id=aeps&year_id=2016

  • Zhang Lizi, & Xu Chuanlong. (2017). “中国能源大省电力市场建设经验分析.” Electricity market construction experience of major provinces of energy in China. Electric Power, 50(4), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Pollitt .

Appendix: How Changing Infra-Marginal Bids Changes the Auction Results in the 2016 Power Market Auction Design

Appendix: How Changing Infra-Marginal Bids Changes the Auction Results in the 2016 Power Market Auction Design

What If R2 (the second and third units of retail demand) had bid −100, instead of −50. Panels A to D change and the R2 receives a bigger discount. See Figs. 3.10 to 3.13 for the calculations. R2’s discount was originally −170.8; it is now −268.8. All other prices are changed.

Fig. 3.10
figure 10

Retailer (green) bids and generator (blue) offers, with maximum trading volume (red)

Fig. 3.11
figure 11

Calculation of system discount charge

Fig. 3.12
figure 12

Allocation of system discount charge to winning bidders

Fig. 3.13
figure 13

Calculation of final prices paid to winning retailers and generators

If G1 (the two cheapest units of generation) had bid −350, rather than −400, then they would end up receiving higher payments. Figures 3.143.17 show the calculations. G1’s original payment was a discount of −234.3; it now becomes −206.8. Note all other final prices are changed.

Fig. 3.14
figure 14

Retailer (green) bids and generator (blue) offers, with maximum trading volume (red)

Fig. 3.15
figure 15

Calculation of system discount charge

Fig. 3.16
figure 16

Allocation of system discount charge to winning bidders

Fig. 3.17
figure 17

Calculation of final prices paid to winning retailers and generators

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pollitt, M.G. (2020). Power Market Reform in China: Lessons from Guangdong. In: Reforming the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39462-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics