Abstract
Food unites humanity and expresses many aspects of our identity as a person. However food can signify different things depending on what era you are from, who you are and where you live in the world. One way to look at our relationship with food is by exploring how we educate about food.
In New Zealand the Health and Physical Education curriculum utilises a socioecological perspective, where learning about food and nutrition is used to explore factors of influence upon the well-being of individuals, families and communities. The practical components include not only selecting, preparing, cooking and serving food but also engaging students with opportunities in health promotion within their school and/or local community. Another food focus from the Technology curriculum bases food technology within a sociocultural learning theory perspective where learning experiences in food technology are to be explorative, authentic in nature, practical and transformational. Students develop material and ingredient knowledge to formulate food products that meet the needs of a specific audience. Exploration of the impact of target audiences, resources and economic constraints is undertaken to gain understandings and experiences in the development of food products.
This chapter examines the issue of food education in New Zealand, reviewing the past and exploring the current situation. This chapter then explores a theoretical model that presents food as a technological outcome. Specific reference will be made to what components of food could be taught to students at junior secondary level (12–14 years, Year Level 8–10).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, O., Shengelia, B., Goubarev, A., Issakov, A., Kwankam, S. Y., Stilwell, B., et al. (2002). Human, physical and intellectual resource generation—proposals for monitoring. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper49.pdf
Beauman, C., Cannon, G., Elmadfa, I., Glasauer, P., Hoffman, I., Keller, M., et al. (2005). The Giessen declaration. Public Health Nutrition, 8(6a), 783–786.
Boys-Smith, W. (1910). Syllabus of classes for the degree and diploma in home science. Retrieved from University of Otago, 6 MS 260 Hocken collections, archives and manuscripts, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Cannon, G., & Leitzmann, C. (2006). The new nutrition science project. Scandinavian Journal of Food and Nutrition, 50(1), 5–12.
Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2003). Enhancing technological practice: An assessment framework for technology education in New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 1–26.
Compton, V., & France, B. (2006). Discussion document: Background information on the new strands. Retrieved from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/nzcurriculum/draft-curriculum/technology_e.php
De Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Department of Education. (1985). Home economics forms 1–4 syllabus. Wellington: Department of Education.
Ewing, J. L. (1970). The development of the New Zealand primary school curriculum 1877–1970. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Whitcombe and Tombs Limited.
Hipkins, R., Conner, L., & Neill, A. (2005). Shifting balances 2—the impact level 1 and 2 NCEA implementation on the teaching of geography and home economics. NZCER report forwarded to the Ministry of Education in July 2005. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/ShiftingBalances2_0.pdf
Jones, A. (1997). Technology education in the New Zealand curriculum. In J. Burns (Ed.), Technology in the New Zealand curriculum—perspectives on practice (pp. 46–59). Palmerston North: Dunmore.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://is.njit.edu/pubs/Delphibook
McGinn, R. E. (1978). What is technology? Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1, 179–197.
McGregor, S. L. T. (1997). The impact of different paradigms on home economics practice. Journal of the Home Economics Institute of Australia, 4(3), 23–33.
Ministry of Education. (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (1999). Health and physical education in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2003a). Curriculum stocktake report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from https://www.tki.org.nz/r/nzcurricukum/about/recommendtions_e.phpwww.tki.org.nz/r/nzcurricukum/about/recommendtions_e.php
Ministry of Education. (2003b). Report of the New Zealand national curriculum, 2002. Australian Council of educational research. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/7494/cs7491%2D%2D-school-sampling-study1.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2005). High level summary statements from review of Beacon Schools in home economics and health education. Report to the Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/health/beacon/pdf/high-level-summ.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2006). The New Zealand curriculum draft for consultation 2006. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Archives/Curriculum-project-archives/Developing-the-draft/Health-and-physical-education
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mitcham, C. (2001). Carl Mitcham: Philosophizing about technology: Why should we bother? Retrieved October 29, 2019, from https://ethix.org/2001/06/01/philosophizing-about-technology-why-should-we-bother
Openshaw, R., Lee, G., & Lee, H. (1993). Challenging the myths: Rethinking New Zealand’s educational history. Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press Limited.
Pitt, J. C. (2000). Thinking about technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Rata, E., & Sullivan, R. (2009). Introduction to the history of New Zealand education. North Shore: Pearson.
Slatter, W. (2017). Education for food literacy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Auckland, Auckland.
Street, P. (2006). Home economics education in New Zealand: A position statement. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/nzcurriculum/draft-curriculum/health_physical_e.php
Swarbrick, N. (2012). Education from 1840 to 1918, Te Ara—The encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/primary-and-secondary-education/page-2
Tearney, F. (2016). History of education in New Zealand. Working paper 2016/03. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://www.mcguinnessinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/20161213-Working-Paper-201603-History-of-education-in-New-Zealand.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2007). The UN decade of education for sustainable development (DESD 2005–2014). The first two years. Retrieved October 29, 2019, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001540/154093e.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slatter, W. (2020). A Technological Approach to Secondary Food Education in New Zealand. In: Rutland, M., Turner, A. (eds) Food Education and Food Technology in School Curricula. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39339-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39339-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39338-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39339-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)