Skip to main content

Learning Cultural, Ecological and Food Literacies Through the Gumbaynggirr Pathway of Knowledge Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Education and Food Technology in School Curricula

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Technology Education ((CITE))

  • 608 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents research from a project collaboration undertaken in New South Wales, Australia, between a rural primary school, local Aboriginal Gumbaynggirr Elders and Southern Cross University. The research responded to an expressed school and community need for teacher professional development on local Aboriginal culture. The aim was to understand food values at the core of Australian native food and plant knowledge systems, coupled with developing transferable teaching strategies for the classroom. Exploring and understanding natural food sources were triangulated between Australian Aboriginal science and Western science, visualised through nature journaling. Accordingly, the research methodology assigned three settings of engagement: (1) the embedding of local Gumbaynggirr perspectives in curriculum delivery across years K-6 in an integrated, culturally sustaining and cross-curriculum manner (cultural literacies), (2) the embedding of sustainability perspectives to better understand earth’s natural systems and food supply sources (ecological literacies) and (3) the embedding of food technology and design applications, to enhance student learning on Australian native plants as a science, an art, and a sustainable, healthy lifestyle (food technology and design literacies].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘“Aboriginal” and “Torres Strait Islander” refer to different groups of peoples. Aboriginal refers to the original peoples of mainland Australia. Torres Strait Islander refers to the original peoples of the 274 islands located north of Australia between the tip of Cape York in Queensland and Papua New Guinea’ (Common Ground, n.d.). ‘The term “Indigenous” is used to refer to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ (Australian Human Rights Commission, n.d.).

References

  • 8 Aboriginal Ways of Learning. (2011). 8 Aboriginal ways of learning. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from http://8ways.wikispaces.com/

  • Andersen, C. (2012). Teacher education, Aboriginal studies and the new national curriculum. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41, 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., & Hickey, A. (2011). Knowledges and knowing: Indigenous and alternative knowledges and the western canon. The International Journal of Science in Society, 2(2), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). The tests. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/the-tests

  • Australian Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). Questions and answers about Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/questions-and-answers-about-aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-peoples

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list

  • Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS). (2012). Guidelines for ethical research in Australian Indigenous Studies (2nd ed.). Retrieved April 1, 2019 http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/docs/GERAIS.pdf

  • Bargal, D. (2008). Action research: A paradigm for achieving social change. Small Group Research, 39(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407313407. Retrieved November 8, 2019.

  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Environmental Education, 40, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2010). Nurturing relationships within a space created by “indigenous ways of knowling”: A case study. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, V. (2005). Literacy: What level for food, land, natural resources, and environment? Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 34, 112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M., & Prince, M. (2015). Designing an Australian Indigenous Studies curriculum for the twenty-first century: Nakata’s ‘cultural interface’, standpoints and working beyond binaries. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.956691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common Ground. (n.d.). Aboriginal, indigenous or first nations? Retrieved January 1, 2019, from https://www.commonground.org.au/learn/aboriginal-or-indigenous

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., & Opplinger, A. (2007). The interface between indigenous and non-indigenous systems of knowing and learning: A green report on a Dharug Language Programme. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarsten, M., Askerlund, P., Almers, E., Avery, H., & Samuelsson, T. (2018). Developing ecological literacy in a forest garden: Children’s perspectives. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19, 227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1517371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N., & Greenfield, M. (2011). Relationship to place: Positioning aboriginal knowledge and perspectives in classroom pedagogies. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2011.536513

  • Hart, V., Whatman, S., McLaughlin, J., & Sharma-Brymer, V. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical relationships and experiences of embedding Indigenous Australian knowledge in teaching practicum. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(5), 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerwin, D., & Van Issum, H. (2011). Teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander studies: Nunta Benta - look and learn. In C. Marsh & C. Hart (Eds.), Teaching the social sciences and humanities in an Australian Curriculum (pp. 309–332). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, M. (2011). Anthropology, politics and the changing world of Aboriginal Australians. Anthropological Forum, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2011.549447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, M., Palmer, L., Tehan, M., & Shain, K. (2004). Honour among nations? Treaties and agreements with indigenous people. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay, E., & Barney, K. (2014). PEARLs, problems and politics: Exploring findings from two teaching and learning projects in indigenous Australian studies at the University of Queensland. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2014.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Teneriffe, QLD: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, B. B. (2011). Essential elements of ecological literacy and the pathways to achieve it: Perspectives of ecologists. PhD, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/380

  • McBride, B. B., Brewer, A. R., Berkowitz, W. T., & Borrie, B. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. C. (1990). Literacy as reasoning within multiple discourses: Implications for policy and educational reform. Newton, MA: Education Development Corporation Literacies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, G., Anlezark, J., & Uibo, D. (1998). Beyond bush tucker: Implementing indigenous perspectives through the science curriculum. Darwin: Northern Territory Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2011). Pathways for indigenous education in the Australian Curriculum framework. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 40, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajie.40.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Treaty of Waitangi. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Principles/Treaty-of-Waitangi

  • Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needs change in stance, terminology and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, B. (2014). Dark emu: Black seeds agriculture or acident? Broome, WA: Magabala Books Aboriginal Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, B. (2016). Walking together, eating together. In J. Newton (Ed.), The oldest foods on earth: A history of Australian native foods, with recipes. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, N. (2009). Radical hope: Education and equality in Australia. Quarterly Essay, 35, 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, L. I. (2011). Including Aboriginal perspectives in the Australian Curriculum: Advice to teachers. Primary & Middle Years Educator, 9(1), 14–18. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1107&context=research_conference

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2013). A critical examination of food technology, innovation and teacher education: A technacy genre theory perspective. Doctor of Philosophy, Southern Cross, Coffs Harbour, NSW and Lismore, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., & Seemann, K. (2006). It’s time to study values at the core of food technology education. In H. Middleton & M. Pavlova (Eds.), Values in technology education (Vol. 1, pp. 180–190). Centre For Learning Research. ISBN: 978-1-921291-10-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., & Seemann, K. (2010). Clarifying sustainable food futures through technacy genre theory. Paper presented at the paper presented at the 1st international conference on technological learning and thinking, moving to think: Culture, design, sustainability, human ingenuity. Retrieved from http://m1.cust.educ.ubc.ca/conference/index.php/TLT/2010/paper/download/37/1

  • Turner, A., Wilson, K., & Wilks, J. (2017). Aboriginal community engagement in primary schooling: Promoting learning through a cross-cultural lens. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Education Sector. (2004). The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programs: Position paper. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136246e.pdf

  • Verma, M. (2018). Tucker bush: Edible Australian tucker bush. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from https://tuckerbush.com.au/schools-program/

  • Yunkaporta, T. (2009). Aboriginal pedagogies at the cultural interface. PhD, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/10974/

  • Yunkaporta, T., & Kirby, M. (2011). Yarning up indigenous pedagogies: A dialogue about eight Aboriginal ways of learning. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education (pp. 205–214). Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge that this work was undertaken in Gumbaynggirr, and I thank the Gumbaynggirr people who so generously gave their time and shared their stories with the teachers and students. Without your valued collegial support and guidance, this project would not have been possible. I would also like to acknowledge the principal of the school, Gillian Stuart, for her continued enthusiasm and commitment on forging research collaborations between the local Gumbaynggirr people, the public school and Southern Cross University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Turner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, A. (2020). Learning Cultural, Ecological and Food Literacies Through the Gumbaynggirr Pathway of Knowledge Project. In: Rutland, M., Turner, A. (eds) Food Education and Food Technology in School Curricula. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39339-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39339-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39338-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39339-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics