Abstract
This chapter considers how threat is defined, created and controlled. It explores the relationship between threat and risk. It focuses on the social psychological processes involved when societal agents actively influence the way risk arises, is understood and, as a result, ensure that it becomes threat. Identity Process Theory and Social Representations Theory are used to direct this analysis. The ‘threat process’ is outlined. It is argued that the early twenty-first century is an age of societal uncertainty, where previously established beliefs and values are severely challenged and change at many different levels is occurring rapidly and unpredictably, and this gives rise to an era of threat—in which there is no agreed system for interpreting such complex and interacting threats. This creates an opportunity for those who can control channels of communication to manipulate the representations of threat and influence reactions to threat. The chapter goes on to describe the significance of identity processes and social representations in the era of threat. It considers how the identity processes of the individual respond to the threat nexus in this age of societal uncertainty. It concludes with the assertion that identity-defending coping strategies, in the face of threat, are enormously resilient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breakwell, G. M. (Ed.). (1983). Threatened identities. Chichester: Wiley.
Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. Methuen, New York, London.
Breakwell, G. M. (1988). Strategies adopted when identity is threatened. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale,1(2), 189–204.
Breakwell, G. M. (1990). Social beliefs about gender differences. In: C. Fraser & G. Gaskell (Eds.), The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (1993). Integrating paradigms, methodological implications. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 180–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (2001a). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Breakwell, G. M. (2001b). Mental models and social representations of hazards: the significance of identity processes. Journal of Risk Research,4(4), 341–351.
Breakwell, G. M. (2010b). Models of risk construction: Some applications to climate change. In M. Hulme (Ed.), Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate change.
Breakwell, G. M (2011). Empirical approaches to social representations and identity processes: 20 years on. Papers on Social Representations, 20, 17.1–17.4. ISSN: 1021-5573.
Breakwell, G. M. (2014a). The psychology of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (2014b). Identity and social representations. In R. Jaspal & G. M. Breakwell (Eds.), Identity process theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (2015a). Coping with threatened identities. London: Psychology Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (2015b). Identity process theory. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Clausewitz, C. (1832). Vom kriege. Berlin: Dummlers Verlag.
Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labour in society. Paris: Presses Universitaires.
Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. Paris: Free Press.
Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Quadrel, M. J. (2000). Risk perception and communication (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jaspal, R., & Breakwell, G. M. (Eds.). (2014). Identity process theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing 15 years of research and theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., et al. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis,8, 177–187.
Lukes, S. (1974, 2015). Power a radical view. London: MacMillan Press.
Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representation. European Journal of Social Psychology,18(3), 211–250.
Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renn, O. (2011). The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change. WIREs Climate Change,2, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.99.
Rosa, E. A. (2003). The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework: Metatheoretical foundations and policy implications. In Royal Society (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society.
Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge handbook of social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sjöberg, L. (2002). Are received risk perception models alive and well? Risk Analysis,22, 665–669.
Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk. London: Earthscan.
Sun Tzu, (c.403–221 BC). On War.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology,5, 207–232.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science,185, 1124–1131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breakwell, D.G. (2020). In the Age of Societal Uncertainty, the Era of Threat. In: Jodelet, D., Vala, J., Drozda-Senkowska, E. (eds) Societies Under Threat. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39315-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39315-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39314-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39315-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)