Advertisement

Immigrants and Refugees: From Social Disaffection to Perceived Threat

  • Jorge ValaEmail author
  • Cícero Roberto Pereira
Chapter
First Online:
  • 72 Downloads
Part of the Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research book series (FSSR, volume 3)

Abstract

Immigrants and refugees are today represented as a threat by a significant number of Europeans and constitute a topic that divides Governments and is at the centre of the agenda of new European extreme right-wing. This chapter presents a new approach and innovative hypotheses about the factors underlying the representation of immigrants and refugees as a threat, and their role in legitimizing discrimination, social inequalities and the development of anti-immigrant and anti-refugee public policies. Our approach is based on the hypothesis that immigrants and refugees are perceived as a threat to individual and collective life projects, particularly by those experiencing a sense of social disaffection (i.e., a generalized feeling that conjointly expresses dissatisfaction with life, perception of lack of control over life and distrust of the social system’s nuclear institutions). Using new data from the European Social Survey, we propose an analytical model specifying the correlates of threat perceptions and the mediating role of threat on the relationship between social disaffection and opposition to immigration and refugees in Europe. Results have shown that the sense of threat is related to right-wing political positioning, exclusive national identity, anti-universalistic values and, more importantly, with the sense of social disaffection. Significantly, threat perceptions play a legitimating role in the relationship between social disaffection and opposition to immigration and to hosting refugees. We further discuss the theoretical and socio-political implications of our approach to the study of threat in the context of contemporary social dynamics.

Keywords

Social disaffection Refugees Threat perceptions Social inequalities Social legitimation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobo, L. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breakwell, G. (2007). The psychology of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Correia, I., & Vala, J. (2003). When will be a victim secondarily victimized? The effect of observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Social Justice Research, 16, 379–400.Google Scholar
  5. Correia, I., Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (2018). Under victimization by an outgroup: Belief in a just world, national identification, and ingroup blame. Frontiers in Psychology.Google Scholar
  6. Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R., & Jost, J. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1893/1999). Le suicide. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  8. Fiske, S. (2009). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and social behavior: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. Journal of Psychology, 9, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jodelet, D. (2017). Les menaces: Passer du mot au concept. In C. Sabine, V. Bonnot, & E. Drosda-Senkowska (Eds.), Menaces sociales et environnementales. Repense la société des risques. PUR: Rennes.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, D., Gutek, B., & Barton, E. (1977). Social disaffection among deprived groups. International Journal of Intercultural relations, 1, 12–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2013). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 24, 1918–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krauth-Gruber, S., & Drozda-Senkowska, E. (2017). Ces groups qui ne nous laissent pas indifférents. In S. Caillaud, V. Bonnot, & E. Drozda-Senkowska (Eds.), Menaces Sociales et environnementales: Repenser la société des risques. PUR: Rennes.Google Scholar
  16. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, B. (2002). What went wrong? Western impact and Middle East response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leyens, J Ph, Paladino, M. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, A. P., et al. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madeira, A. F., Pereira, C. R., Gama, A., & Dias, S. (2018). Justifying treatment bias: The legitimizing role of threat perception and immigrant–provider contact in healthcare. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(2), 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Major, B., & Kaiser, (2017). Ideology and the maintenance of group inequality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 1–11.Google Scholar
  21. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Murray, D. (2017). The strange death of Europe. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. Pereira, C. R., Álvaro, J. L., & Vala, J. (2018). The ego-defensive role of legitimacy: How threat-based justifications protect the self-esteem of discriminators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10), 1473–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pereira, C. R., Ramos, A., & Vala, J. (in prep). Social disaffection and anti-refugees attitudes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. Pereira, C. R., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereira, C. R., Vala, J., & Leyens, J.-P. (2009). From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perez, J., Moscovici, S., & Chulvi, B. (2007). The taboo against group contact: Hypothesis of gypsy ontologization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramos, A. (2011). Human values and opposition to immigration in Europe. Ph.D. Thesis. Instituto de Ciências Sociais. University of Lisbon, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  30. Ramos, A., Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (2016). Economic crisis, human values and attitudes towards immigrants. In M. Voicu, I. C. Mochmann, & H. Dülmer (Eds.), Values, economic crisis and democracy (pp. 104–137). New York: Routledge. ISSB: 978-1-13-895917-0.Google Scholar
  31. Ramos, A., Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (in press). The impact of biological and cultural racisms on attitudes towards immigrants and immigration public policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.Google Scholar
  32. Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roebroeck, E., & Guimond, S. (2017). Idéologies politiques, Menaces collectives et préjugés. In S. Caillaud, V. Bonnot, & E. Drozda-Senkowska (Eds.), Menaces Sociales et environnementales: Repenser la société des risques. PUR: Rennes.Google Scholar
  34. Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Keefer, L. A. (2012). A dual-motive model of scapegoating: Displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1148–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European Countries public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlueter, E., Schmidt, P., & Wagner, U. (2008). Disentangling the causal relations of perceived group threat and outgroup derogation: Cross-national evidence from German and Russian panel surveys. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advanced and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  39. Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test-performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5):797–811.Google Scholar
  40. Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Rios, K. (2015). Intergroup threat theory. In Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
  41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall inc.Google Scholar
  42. Teymoori, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., et al. (2016). Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vala, J., Pereira, C., & Ramos, A. (2006). Racial prejudice, threat perception and opposition to immigration: A comparative analysis. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Wassel, M. (2010). Political dissatisfaction: What we can learn from asking the people. Parliamentary Affairs, 63, 504–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verkuyten, M. (2017). The benefits of studying immigration for social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Ciências SociaisLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Federal University of ParaíbaJoão PessoaBrazil

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options