The Role of the Local Emergency Manager in a Centralized System of Disaster Management

Part of the Mercatus Studies in Political and Social Economy book series (MSPSE)


Centralization in the emergency management framework after September 11, 2001, has been widely debated for its effect on the appropriate roles of government. To better understand the implications of centralization on US disaster management, a nationwide survey of county emergency managers was conducted that identified several issues regarding the expansive federal role in day-to-day operations of local emergency management. Somewhat surprisingly, survey responses of local emergency managers describe the current disaster management framework as a centrally planned function. The results of this survey are further explored through a literature review which examines the role of the local emergency manager, given that he has little autonomy from the federal government.


  1. Balonon-Rosen, P. 2017. The Business of Disaster: How Does the U.S. Spend Relief Money? Marketplace, November 27.
  2. Birkland, T.A., and S.E. DeYoung. 2011. Emergency Response, Doctrinal Confusion, and Federalism in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41 (3): 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkland, T., and S. Waterman. 2008. Is Federalism the Reason for Policy Failure in Hurricane Katrina? Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (4): 692–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, W. 2004. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Higher Education Project Update, December 3, 2004. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Scholar
  5. Choi, S.O. 2004. Emergency Management Growth in the State of Florida. State & Local Government Review 36 (3): 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, M.L., and S.L. Peerbolte. 2012. Public Administration Emergency Management Pedagogy: Cultivating the Habit of Critical Thinking. Journal of Public Affairs Education 18 (2): 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comfort, L. 1985. Integrating Organizational Action in Emergency Management; Strategies for Change. Public Administration Review 45 (Special Issue: Emergency Management: A Challenge for Public Administration): 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crabill, A. L. 2015. The Effects of Federal Financial Assistance: Attitudes and Actions of Local Emergency Managers. University of Delaware Thesis.
  9. Cwiak, C., K. Cline, and T. Karlgaard. 2004. Emergency Management Demographics: What Can We Learn from a Comparative Analysis of IAEM Respondents and Rural Emergency Managers? Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Scholar
  10. Derthick, M. 2009. The Transformation That Fell Short: Bush, Federalism, and Emergency Management. Paper for the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, Albany, N.Y.
  11. FEMA. 2016. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as Amended, and Related Authorities as of August 2016, Public Law 93-288. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency and US Congress. Scholar
  12. FEMA. 2017a. Emergency Management Performance Grant Program. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency and US Congress. Scholar
  13. FEMA. 2017b. Homeland Security Grant Program. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency and US Congress. Scholar
  14. Garrett, T.A., and R.S. Sobel. 2003. The Political Economy of FEMA Disaster Payments. Economic Inquiry 41 (3): 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IAEM. 2012. Emergency Management Performance Grant Funds: Returns on Investment at the Local Level. Falls Church, VA: US Council of International Association of Emergency Managers. Scholar
  16. IAEM. 2018. IAEM-USA Legislative Priorities. Falls Church, VA: US Council of International Association of Emergency Managers. Scholar
  17. Jensen, J. 2011. Preparedness: A Principled Approach to Return on Investment. Falls Church, VA: International Association of Emergency Managers. Scholar
  18. Jensen, C., and H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kincaid, J. 1990. From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 509 (1): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovell, C.H. 1981. Evolving Local Government Dependency. Public Administration Review 41 (Special Issue: The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Urban Public Finance): 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miao, Q., Y. Hou, and M. Abrigo. 2016. Measuring the Financial Shocks of Natural Disasters: A Panel Study of U.S. States. National Tax Journal 71 (1): 11–44.Google Scholar
  22. Mitnick, B. M. 1975. The Theory of Agency: A Framework. SSR Working Paper No. ID 1021642.
  23. National Emergency Management Association. 2018. NEMA’s Role in Washington. Accessed December 15, 2017.
  24. New York v. United States. 1992. US Supreme Court, Volume 505, U.S. 144.
  25. Niskanen, W.A. 1968. The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy. The American Economic Review 58 (2): 293–305.Google Scholar
  26. O’Connor, M. J. 2005. From Chaos to Clarity: Educating Emergency Managers. University of Akron Dissertation.!etd.send_file?accession=akron1123250948&disposition=inline.
  27. People ex rel. Le Roy v. Hurlbut. 1871. Michigan Supreme Court.
  28. Roberts, P.S. 2007. Dispersed Federalism as a New Regional Governance for Homeland Security. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (3): 416–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ross, S. 1973. The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. The American Economic Review 63 (2): 134–139.Google Scholar
  30. Scavo, C., R.C. Kearney, and R.J. Kilroy. 2008. Challenges to Federalism: Homeland Security and Disaster Response. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (1): 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sobel, R.S., and P.T. Leeson. 2006. Government’s Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Public Choice Analysis. Public Choice 127: 55–73.Google Scholar
  32. Sullivan, J. 2003. The Tenth Amendment and Local Government. The Yale Law Journal 112 (7): 1935–1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. US Census Bureau. 2009. American FactFinder – Results. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. Scholar
  34. US House Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. 2006. A Failure of Initiative: The Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, H. Rept. 109-377. Washington, DC: US House of Representatives. Scholar
  35. Waugh, W.L. 1994. Regionalizing Emergency Management: Counties as State and Local Government. Public Administration Review 54 (3): 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waugh, W.L., and G. Streib. 2006. Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management. Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weaver, J., L.C. Harkabus, J. Braun, S. Miller, R. Cox, J. Griffith, and R.J. Mazur. 2014. An Overview of a Demographic Study of United States Emergency Managers. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95 (2): 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anthem Planning Inc.MiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations