Abstract
We report on an experimental study examining what aspectual tense forms we use to convey aspectual meanings when talking about present events in English. We test the effect of structural priming on the use of aspectual tense morphosyntax in the English present tense by native speakers, upper-intermediate and advanced L2 learners of English with French as their native language. Comparative production data from a video retell task is used. Aspectual choices from two previous studies by Liszka are compared with our partial replication. While Liszka primed participants to use the progressive tense, our instructions were neutral in this respect. Findings for native speakers point to a high level of individual variation in the use of present progressive and present simple to denote events simultaneous with the speech moment. Not only are choices variable, but they are also influenced by priming. We argue that this variability creates difficulties for learners of English that teachers should know about.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Al-Thubaiti, K. A. (2015). L2 acquisition of English aspect by L1 Arabic speakers: The role of interpretable features at the syntax-semantics interface. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp. 185–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ayoun, D. (2005). The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a universal grammar perspective. In D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 79–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ayoun, D. (2015). The acquisition of the present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 33, 931–949.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language acquisition? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Language Analysis, 20, 3–49.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology., 18, 355–387.
Chuquet, H. (1994). Le présent de narration en anglais et en français. Paris: Ophrys.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowper, E. (1998). The simple present tense in English: A unified treatment. Studia Linguistica, 52(1), 1–18.
Déchaine, R., & Manfredi, V. (2000). Interpreting null tense. Paper presented at the Round Table on the syntax of tense and aspect, November 2000, University of Paris.
Dominguez, L. (2007). Knowledge of features in fossilized second language grammars. Second Language Research, 23(2), 243–260.
Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000594.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17(3), 213–247.
Franceschina, F. (2005). Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gabriele, A., & Canales, A. (2011). No time like the present: Examining transfer at the interfaces in second language acquisition. Lingua, 121, 670–687.
Gries, S. T., & Kootstra, G. J. (2017). Structural priming within and across languages: A corpus-based perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition., 20(2), 235–250.
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301.
Hawkins, R., Casillas, G., Hattori, H., Hawthorne, J., Husted, R., Lozano, C., Okamoto, A., Thomas, E., & Yamada, K. (2008). The semantic effects of verb raising and its consequences in second language grammars. In J. Liceras, H. Zobi, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in language acquisition (pp. 333–355). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hopp, H. (2012). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56.
Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R. P. (2011). Between- and within- language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276–290.
Langacker, R. W. (2011). The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality (pp. 45–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Leal, T. M., & Slabakova, R. (2014). The interpretability hypothesis again: A partial replication of Tsimpli and Dimitrakopoulou 2007. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 537–557.
Liszka, S. A. (2009). Associating meaning to form in advanced L2 speakers: An investigation into the acquisition of the English present simple and present progressive. In N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 229–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Liszka, S. A. (2015). The L2 acquisition of the English present simple – Present progressive distinction: Verb-raising revisited. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp. 57–85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mortier, L. (2008). An analysis of progressive aspect in French and Dutch in terms of variation and specialization. Language in Contrast, 8(1), 1–20.
Rankin, T., & Unsworth, S. (2016). Beyond poverty: Engaging with input in generative SLA. Second Language Research., 32(4), 563–572.
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2013). Processing of gender and number agreement in late Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(5), 607–627.
Salaberry, M. R., Comajoan, L., & González, P. (2013). Integrating the analyses of tense and aspect across research and methodological frameworks. In M. R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 423–450). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilingauls: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171.
Slabakova, R. (2003). Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research, 19(1), 42–75.
Slabakova, R. (2013). Adult second language acquisition: A selective overview with a focus on the learner linguistic system. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(1), 48–72.
Slabakova, R. (2015). The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on second language knowledge of the syntax-discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 671–699.
Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Revised second edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242.
Vraicu, A. (2015). The simple present and the expression of temporality in L1 English and L2 English oral narratives: When form meets discourse. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp. 289–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Williams, C. (2002). Non-progressive aspect in English in commentaries and demonstrations using the present tense. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1235–1256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dudley, A., Slabakova, R. (2020). The Present Tense in English, Again. In: Trotzke, A., Kupisch, T. (eds) Formal Linguistics and Language Education. Educational Linguistics, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39257-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39257-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39256-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39257-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)